From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 07:52:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 03:52:00 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 451160] Main Page Text is running into footers on PDF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070752.m677q0oF011606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Main Page Text is running into footers on PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451160 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-07 03:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=311132) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=311132&action=view) Sample of this guide built with beta toolchain -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 07:52:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 03:52:40 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 451160] Main Page Text is running into footers on PDF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070752.m677qeC1011746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Main Page Text is running into footers on PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451160 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-07 03:52 EST ------- I have good news and bad news about this. The bad news is that the new version of FOP (0.95), which we are moving to, does not display footnotes for ulinks that are inside lists or tables :( The good news is that footnotes it does display are displayed correctly. This will probably mean that you will have to either remove the text in the ulink, so the url is displayed inline, or you need to re-factor the XML so the ulinks are not inside links/tables :( See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 03:51:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 23:51:38 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 454376] New: Publican should depend on make Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454376 Summary: Publican should depend on make Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: jwulf at redhat.com QAContact: mhideo at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Publican doesn't specify make as a dependency and will install with no warning on a system without make installed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): latest How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install publican rpm on system without make installed 2. Try to make anything. 3. Actual results: Tells you that make is not found. Expected results: Publican should pull make in during dependency resolution. Additional info: thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 03:58:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 23:58:14 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 454376] Publican should depend on make In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807080358.m683wEpD018580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Publican should depend on make https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454376 jwulf at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|5.4 |5.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 04:06:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 00:06:12 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 454376] Publican should depend on make In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807080406.m6846CGQ022187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Publican should depend on make https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454376 jwulf at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |454377 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 04:06:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 00:06:11 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 454377] New: xml files in root directory cause find to fail during preprocessing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454377 Summary: xml files in root directory cause find to fail during preprocessing Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: jwulf at redhat.com QAContact: mhideo at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com *Start: Words Of Interest* find: paths must precede expression Usage: find [-H] [-L] [-P] [path...] [expression] *End: Words Of Interest* Hopefully that makes sense to you, because no-one else will understand it... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 05:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 01:18:06 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 454376] Publican should depend on make In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807080518.m685I6HN001970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Publican should depend on make https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454376 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.34 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-08 01:18 EST ------- Added missing make Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 05:18:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 01:18:07 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 454377] xml files in root directory cause find to fail during preprocessing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807080518.m685I7Pn001987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: xml files in root directory cause find to fail during preprocessing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454377 Bug 454377 depends on bug 454376, which changed state. Bug 454376 Summary: Publican should depend on make https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454376 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 05:26:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 01:26:58 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 454377] xml files in root directory cause find to fail during preprocessing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807080526.m685Qwao003634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: xml files in root directory cause find to fail during preprocessing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454377 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.34 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-08 01:26 EST ------- This was a bug in the way the new apsell call was finding files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 07:14:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 03:14:10 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 454394] New: Other credits incorrectly marked as Translator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454394 Summary: Other credits incorrectly marked as Translator Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: jfearn at redhat.com QAContact: mhideo at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Description of problem: All types of othercredits are incorrectly marked as Translator, they should be correctly identified as Technical Editor or what ever role it is they performed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.33 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Add an other credit to an author group, set role to anything besides translator 2. Build book Actual results: All other credits marked as Translator. Expected results: Role should be printed correctly. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 07:34:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 03:34:13 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 454394] Other credits incorrectly marked as Translator in PDF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807080734.m687YDUb020370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Other credits incorrectly marked as Translator in PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454394 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.34 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Summary|Other credits incorrectly |Other credits incorrectly |marked as Translator |marked as Translator in PDF ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-08 03:34 EST ------- Made gettext call use class attribute when fetching translated text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 15:35:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:35:30 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 443024] Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131535.m6DFZUJE006358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443024 stickster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From stickster at gmail.com 2008-07-13 11:35 EST ------- This can be fixed in the current (F-8, F-9, devel) package CVS -- it's just a specfile change and a new build and push. It doesn't need to hang on 0.34 being ready. I'm happy to do it, if that helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 02:53:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:53:15 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 443024] Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807150253.m6F2rFdC015098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443024 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-14 22:53 EST ------- publican-0.33-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 03:20:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:20:25 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 443024] Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807150320.m6F3KPSS019886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443024 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-14 23:20 EST ------- Vote 1: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/pending/publican-0.33-1.fc9 Also built in devel and F8. However as kdesdk-utils is not available in F8 I did not push it as an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 22:20:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:20:52 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 443024] Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807152220.m6FMKqQi004132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443024 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mdehaan at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-15 18:20 EST ------- *** Bug 455412 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 14:16:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:16:41 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 443024] Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807171416.m6HEGftQ011293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443024 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-17 10:16 EST ------- publican-0.33-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 02:48:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:48:26 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 455826] New: Remove periods from titles in pdf Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455826 Summary: Remove periods from titles in pdf Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: daobrien at redhat.com QAContact: mhideo at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Description of problem: The current pdf output puts periods at the end of titles. These need to be removed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: This is a formalpara title. Expected results: This is a formalpara title Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 20 23:36:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:36:59 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 443024] Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807202336.m6KNaxHt018453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443024 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 20 23:42:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:42:39 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 456026] New: Document Conventions needs urgent update Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456026 Summary: Document Conventions needs urgent update Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: urgent Component: publican AssignedTo: bforte at redhat.com ReportedBy: jfearn at redhat.com QAContact: mhideo at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Description of problem: The Documentation Conventions uses visual style to explain the visual style. This makes it impossible to know if the visual style is correct! The Documentation Conventions should include a descriptive text that can be used to verify the visual style is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 00:43:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:43:52 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 456026] Document Conventions needs urgent update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807210043.m6L0hqjB027859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Document Conventions needs urgent update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456026 ------- Additional Comments From daobrien at redhat.com 2008-07-20 20:43 EST ------- You beat me to it. This has needed updating for a while but I haven't gotten around to it. Perhaps now would be a good time to get rid of the extra white space in the examples, improve the content of the examples, and reduce the number of admonitions (3 is plenty). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 01:34:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:34:13 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 455826] Remove periods from titles in pdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807210134.m6L1YD5W002510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove periods from titles in pdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455826 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.34 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-20 21:34 EST ------- Stopped template formalpara/title from adding runinhead.default.title.end.punct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 03:29:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:29:31 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 456026] Document Conventions needs urgent update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807210329.m6L3TVFf024332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Document Conventions needs urgent update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456026 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-20 23:29 EST ------- I agree that 5 is over kill, however since we have a _lot_ of existing content that uses all 5, it would be a major effort to remove the two we decide to drop. Since this effort won't be undertaken it will mean we will ship books that use admonitions not discussed in the Documentation Conventions. IMHO I think that three should be chose and from hereon the other 2 would not be used and would, over time, be removed from existing docs. But until that process is complete all 5 should remain documented in the conventions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 04:04:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:04:08 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 456026] Document Conventions needs urgent update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807210404.m6L448TJ029357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Document Conventions needs urgent update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456026 ------- Additional Comments From daobrien at redhat.com 2008-07-21 00:04 EST ------- s/[whatever]/[whatever]/g ? :-) Yes, agreed, a bit of work involved in the update. Let's do Step 1 and decide on the 2 to drop and the date for their cessation of use. How about: - integrate Warning and Caution - integrate Note and Tip - decide if we still need Important Probably a bit of redefinition will be required, and possibly a new bugzilla, as I seem to have hijacked this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 07:14:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:14:17 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 456026] Document Conventions needs urgent update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807210714.m6L7EHAV025229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Document Conventions needs urgent update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456026 ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2008-07-21 03:14 EST ------- Not to keep the hijacking up :), but here is something to add to your new bug report regarding redefining admonitions. There *are* differences between a note and a tip. There is a difference between offering warning and shouting caution. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Help:Editing#Admonition_examples Take it or leave it, but it is going to make it more difficult to integrate documentation from/to Fedora if the policies are not in sync. Thus, you might want to take the discussion to fedora-docs-list. You might find many receptive, since the GNOME style guide is otherwise respected, and they agree with your combination: http://library.gnome.org/devel/gdp-style-guide/2.22/infodesign-18.html.en -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 19:11:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:11:01 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 449877] segmented list needs nicer formatting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807211911.m6LJB1qq003383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: segmented list needs nicer formatting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449877 stickster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stickster at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From stickster at gmail.com 2008-07-21 15:11 EST ------- Does the original source use the instruction before the marker? We make that unnecessary in Fedora Docs toolchain with the stylesheet parameter: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 00:09:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:09:16 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 449877] segmented list needs nicer formatting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807220009.m6M09GWf023235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: segmented list needs nicer formatting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449877 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-21 20:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > This is how we are doing it. This ticket is assigned to Andy to ensure the layout of the resulting table is ... perty :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 00:36:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:36:45 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 456026] Document Conventions needs urgent update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807220036.m6M0ajZt031129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Document Conventions needs urgent update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456026 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-21 20:36 EST ------- I agree with Karsten that it would be a damn fine idea for Red Hat and Fedora docs to be in sync on this. David could you either open a new bug or start a thread on the Fedora Docs list about this. Now let this bug continue on about clarifying the styles :) Cheers, Jeff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jfearn at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 03:47:59 2008 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:47:59 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Would you like publican to do syntax highlighting? Message-ID: <4885586F.7030602@redhat.com> Then get on to this bug and help me get the syntax highlighting package in to Fedora! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455358 I'll try and get a new version of publican built this Friday, I'll post the review URL so we can get it pushed live asap. Cheers, Jeff. From stickster at gmail.com Tue Jul 22 11:31:28 2008 From: stickster at gmail.com (Paul W. Frields) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:31:28 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] Would you like publican to do syntax highlighting? In-Reply-To: <4885586F.7030602@redhat.com> References: <4885586F.7030602@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1216726288.3601.30.camel@victoria> On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 13:47 +1000, Jeff Fearn wrote: > Then get on to this bug and help me get the syntax highlighting package in to Fedora! > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455358 > > I'll try and get a new version of publican built this Friday, I'll post the review > URL so we can get it pushed live asap. For a proper review this probably needs attention from someone who's Java skilled, right? Maybe you should post this heads-up to fedora-devel-list and fedora-java-list. -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 05:19:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:19:14 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 449877] segmented list needs nicer formatting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807230519.m6N5JEJF023632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: segmented list needs nicer formatting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449877 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-23 01:19 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 445628 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 05:25:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:25:02 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 452801] guibutton tags are too close to the background on callouts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807230525.m6N5P2LN019630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: guibutton tags are too close to the background on callouts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452801 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.34 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-07-23 01:25 EST ------- colors have been changed as part of an overall CSS clean up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 04:55:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:55:07 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 442969] FEATURE REQUEST: docbook-lint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807240455.m6O4t75P007123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FEATURE REQUEST: docbook-lint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442969 mhideo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 04:55:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:55:21 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 448022] please revise legal notices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807240455.m6O4tLE7007325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: please revise legal notices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448022 mhideo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 04:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:52:24 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 442969] FEATURE REQUEST: docbook-lint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807240452.m6O4qOer006694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FEATURE REQUEST: docbook-lint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442969 mhideo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Version|9 |rawhide Flag|needinfo?(mhideo at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-07-24 00:52 EST ------- Need to investigate the features further will try to do this in the next 2 months (during f10). Moving to F10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 04:55:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:55:35 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 453246] Linux trademark attribution for legal notice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807240455.m6O4tZS8007503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Linux trademark attribution for legal notice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453246 mhideo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 04:57:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:57:09 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 442969] FEATURE REQUEST: docbook-lint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807240457.m6O4v9Ah001028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FEATURE REQUEST: docbook-lint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442969 mhideo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mhideo at redhat.com |rlerch at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 04:57:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:57:22 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 448022] please revise legal notices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807240457.m6O4vMWG001322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: please revise legal notices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448022 mhideo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mhideo at redhat.com |rlerch at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 04:57:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:57:32 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 453246] Linux trademark attribution for legal notice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807240457.m6O4vW4a001532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Linux trademark attribution for legal notice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453246 mhideo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mhideo at redhat.com |rlerch at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jfearn at redhat.com Fri Jul 25 07:12:53 2008 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:12:53 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] new publican in rawhide Message-ID: <48897CF5.1000603@redhat.com> Hi everybody! I pushed the latest version of publican and publican-fedora in to rawhide today. It's not widely tested so I didn't push them in to F8/9 yet. Major changes are: single fop config file, it gets made when the rpm is built. major HTML & PDF overhaul many big fixes Thanks to Brian Forte and Andy Fitzsimon for the help on layout. Thanks to Joshua Wulf and Brian Forte for the help on updating the Users Guide. Thanks for everyone who opened bugs, even if I haven't gotten around to fixing them yet :D Here is the change log for this version: - Fix PO file name missing from translation status report - Modify xmlClean to output dummy content for empty files (beta) - Default SHOW_UNKNOWN tags off - Make unset entity warnings more obvious - Make docs use DESKTOP styles - Fix missing list image in html-single articles - Commented out debug output in chunking xsl - QANDA set html and css fix BZ #442674 - Fix kde requires. BZ #443024 - Add default FOP xconf file. - Added help_internals target. - Added check for banned tags. - Added --lang to create_book BZ #444851 - Added package tag BZ #444908 - Added ability to ship $lang/files directories with html/xml payloads BZ #444935 - Hardcoded PDF footnote colour to black BZ #446011 - Set segmentedlist.as.table to 1. BZ #445628 - Force monospace on command - Switched to FOP 0.95Beta - Fixed crash bug on files names with parentheses BZ #447659 - Fix loose directory name matching when exluding directiories. - Added GENERATE_SECTION_TOC_LEVEL to allow section level TOC control. BZ #449720 - Banned inlinegraphic. BZ #448331 - Added Article and Set Templates - Banned xreflabel and endterm. BZ #452051 - Generate FOP config file and font-metricfiles as build. BZ #451913 - Changed HTML and PDF common brand to more pleasing colors. BZ #442675 - Fixed incorrect PDF colours on Fedora and Common brands. BZ #442988 - Fixed PDF TOC missing Chapter numbers on Sections. BZ #452802 - Fixed spaces being removed between inline tags. BZ #453067 - Changed TOC layout (bold chapters + spacing). BZ #453885 - Changed title spacing, unbolded figure/table titles. - Fix over size images breaking PDF and HTML layouts - Add missing make Requires. BZ #454376 - Added call to aspell to spell check. - Fixed incorrect other credit title in PDF. BZ #454394 - Turned on Hyphenation to split verbatim lines. - Added code highlighting to CSS and PDF - Remove trailing '.' from formal para title. BZ #455826 - Restructure CSS for easier maintenance of brands - Add documentation on publican design philosophy. BZ #456170 - Italicised package tag. BZ #442668 - Updated documentation descriptions of Book_Info.xml tags. BZ #456489 BZ #456488 Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 31 00:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:30:40 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 457339] New: RFE: can make test please only run over included files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457339 Summary: RFE: can make test please only run over included files Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: mmcallis at redhat.com QAContact: mhideo at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Can "make test" please only run over files that are going to be included in a book, instead of over every file in the book directory? For example, with 20 or so files, it is incredibly frustrating having "make test" produce a endless spew of warnings and errors, when only 1 out of those 20 files is included (to begin with). Actual results: An endless spew of garbage that means nothing to me. Expected results: One set of swanky pants errors for the only files I have included at the present time. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.