From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 00:11:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 19:11:38 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 469595] New: RFE: Improve support for Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: RFE: Improve support for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469595 Summary: RFE: Improve support for Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: daobrien at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Description of problem: The use of this tag doesn't break anything, but the output needs to be improved. Currently there is no line break before (or after - I'm not sure which). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -qi publican Name : publican Version : 0.38 Release : 0.el5 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: FirstName LastName Contribname at redhat.com Expected results: First Name Contrib name at redhat.com Additional info: Real example of expected results: Joe Editor Technical edit of chapters 3 and 4 jedit at mydomain.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 00:22:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 19:22:15 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 469595] RFE: Improve support for In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030022.mA30MFqD004283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469595 --- Comment #1 from David O'Brien 2008-11-02 19:22:14 EDT --- A bit more info: I tried to use this tag like so: Joe Edit Technical edit jedit at mydomain.com I don't know if you would normally modify presentation based on class, I'm just describing how I tried to use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 00:47:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 19:47:58 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 469595] RFE: Improve support for In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030047.mA30lwMJ018161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469595 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-02 19:47:58 EDT --- Added rule for .contrib to CSS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 06:36:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 01:36:10 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 469286] screen inside para outputs invalid XHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030636.mA36aAMc025218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469286 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-03 01:36:09 EDT --- Changed para and simpara to output as div, modified CSS to display correctly. validated XHTML output of Publican User Guide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 21:32:02 2008 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 07:32:02 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] [Fwd: GNU FDL 1.3] Message-ID: <4910BF52.90108@redhat.com> Thought Id ask if anyone has a problem moving the default brand to GFDL 1.3? Currently it uses GFDL 1.2. It looks like a minor, but useful, change to me. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Paul W. Frields" Subject: GNU FDL 1.3 Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:15:55 -0500 Size: 6246 URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 01:48:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 20:48:25 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 469986] New: pdf display of revision history lacks spacing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: pdf display of revision history lacks spacing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469986 Summary: pdf display of revision history lacks spacing Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: dmison at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Description of problem: The pdf revision history doesn't have spaces between the output of the firstname, lastname, email tags Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.38 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1.In Revision_History.xml 1.3 Wed Nov 5 2008 DarrinMison dmison at redhat.com Updated for CP03 Actual results: DarrinMisondmison at redhat.com Expected results: Darrin Mison dmison at redhat.com Additional info: html version has the spaces but doesn't include email address some white space betwen each item would probably enhance reability -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ccurran at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 05:10:26 2008 From: ccurran at redhat.com (Christopher Curran) Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:10:26 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] [Fwd: GNU FDL 1.3] In-Reply-To: <4910BF52.90108@redhat.com> References: <4910BF52.90108@redhat.com> Message-ID: <49112AC2.9010900@redhat.com> Jeff Fearn wrote: > Thought Id ask if anyone has a problem moving the default brand to > GFDL 1.3? Currently it uses GFDL 1.2. > > It looks like a minor, but useful, change to me. > > Cheers, Jeff. > No issues here. It's still the best free documentation license. Chris > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > GNU FDL 1.3 > From: > "Paul W. Frields" > Date: > Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:15:55 -0500 > To: > Fedora Documentation Project > > To: > Fedora Documentation Project > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/305736/rss > http://www.fsf.org/news/fdl-1.3-pr.html > > How does this affect our licensing stand on the FDL? Recall that the > CC-BY-SA licenses are permissible in Fedora. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > publican-list mailing list > publican-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:00:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:00:41 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 470165] New: incorrect page number format for parts in TOC Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: incorrect page number format for parts in TOC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470165 Summary: incorrect page number format for parts in TOC Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: ccurran at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Description of problem: Part's have an incorrect page number format (roman numerals) in the table of contents. The page number should be in decimals for parts. Roman Numerals should only be used for the Preface, TOC and legal pages. This bug only seems to affect the publican-redhat package (I checked Jboss and could not find the same bug). How reproducible: Read the table of contents in http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.2/pdf/Virtualization/Virtualization.pdf Actual results: Roman Numeral page numbers for parts Expected results: decimal page numbers for parts Additional info: The previous version of publican is not affected by this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:46:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:46:01 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 470165] incorrect page number format for parts in TOC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060446.mA64k1Dv032530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470165 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-05 23:46:00 EDT --- This is related to the use of preface inside of part. It occurs in all versions of publican and for all brands. This is due to the page.number.format template, the default code does not have any logic to differentiate the format used for a preface based on where the preface is located. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 01:40:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:40:36 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 470165] incorrect page number format for parts in TOC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070140.mA71ea8U032663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470165 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |bforte at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 01:45:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:45:29 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 470165] incorrect page number format for parts in TOC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070145.mA71jTKG003737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470165 Brian Forte changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Brian Forte 2008-11-06 20:45:29 EDT --- The behaviour ccurran describes is a consequence of the tag being used for material that isn't part of the book's front matter. Specifically, the Virtualization Guide's Book_Info.xml has a structure as follows: part_1_title part_2_title preface_2_title Introductory remarks about part 2. part_3_title preface_3_title Introductory remarks about part 3. As jfearn notes above: > This is due to the page.number.format template, the default code > does not have any logic to differentiate the format used for a > preface based on where the preface is located. And it doesn't have that logic because prefaces are, by definition, front matter. This is, then, expected behaviour and not a bug. The solution to ccurran's problem is to replace all the tags currently inside tags in Book_Info.xml with tags. According to this tag 'contains introductory text, often an overview of the content of the Part.' It has and as parents and takes and <para> as children. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:55:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:55:07 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 462552] syntax highlighting xml comments difficult to read In-Reply-To: <bug-462552-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462552-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811070255.mA72t7AF015179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462552 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-06 21:55:07 EDT --- publican-0.38-0.fc9, perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.09-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:55:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:55:10 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 464038] RFE: please support citerefentry, refentrytitle, and manvolnum In-Reply-To: <bug-464038-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464038-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811070255.mA72tA1M015200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464038 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-06 21:55:09 EDT --- publican-0.38-0.fc9, perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.09-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:54:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:54:54 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 463127] Examples in PDFs are not easily distinguishable from ordinary text In-Reply-To: <bug-463127-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463127-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811070254.mA72ssJi014812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463127 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-06 21:54:54 EDT --- publican-0.38-0.fc9, perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.09-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:55:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:55:25 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 467147] Insufficient error reporting when no revision history is present. In-Reply-To: <bug-467147-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467147-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811070255.mA72tPkB015405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467147 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-06 21:55:25 EDT --- publican-0.38-0.fc9, perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.09-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:55:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:55:02 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 462205] RFE: make test and html, no errors when number of cells is more than the specified value In-Reply-To: <bug-462205-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462205-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811070255.mA72t20A015152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462205 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-06 21:55:01 EDT --- publican-0.38-0.fc9, perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.09-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:55:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:55:13 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 465411] PDF build adds "1" characters into URLs, causing links to fail if people highlight and copy In-Reply-To: <bug-465411-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-465411-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811070255.mA72tDMC015233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465411 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-06 21:55:12 EDT --- publican-0.38-0.fc9, perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.09-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:55:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:55:23 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 467145] clean_ids should not remove comments In-Reply-To: <bug-467145-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467145-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811070255.mA72tNip013067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467145 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-06 21:55:22 EDT --- publican-0.38-0.fc9, perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.09-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:54:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:54:57 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 462673] mangled spacing with >=10 items in an orderedlist In-Reply-To: <bug-462673-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462673-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811070254.mA72svS2012693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462673 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-06 21:54:56 EDT --- publican-0.38-0.fc9, perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.09-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:55:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:55:05 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 462991] Increase space before Glossary and Appendix entries in TOC In-Reply-To: <bug-462991-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462991-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811070255.mA72t5M0013014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462991 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-06 21:55:04 EDT --- publican-0.38-0.fc9, perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.09-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 06:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 01:50:32 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 469986] pdf display of revision history lacks spacing In-Reply-To: <bug-469986-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469986-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811070650.mA76oWBU021026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469986 Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> 2008-11-07 01:50:31 EDT --- Added spaces to Author details. Changed proportional column widths from 1,1,1 to 1,2,3 for better layout. Added extra space between entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 01:27:32 2008 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:27:32 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Oddities with draft settings In-Reply-To: <4906BB69.3020100@redhat.com> References: <4906BB69.3020100@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4918DF84.3090607@redhat.com> Jeff Fearn wrote: > Hi ho, I have been taking a look at drafting due to > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468305 and there is some > crazy stuff happening in the default DocBook XSL. > > In HTML you can only get the draft image in the background in the root > node for the current page and everything on that page is marked as draft. > > In html-single you have to set status to draft in the book and > everything in the book is marked. > > In html the node it will take affect in depends on whether on not that > block is on it's own page. > > In PDF you can only set draft at book or chapter levels. > > I've had a look at the XSL and it's possible to get the HTML outputs to > behave as you'd expect, switch ON at the book/chapter/section level > regardless of it's position on the page. However the PDF is a different > story, it may not be possible to imitate this behaviour without > rewriting a large quantity of the default XSL. > > How should we handle this? I'm tempted to leave the PDF in it's current > state and make the HTML outputs work properly. While this would make > drafting with the PDF less manageable than drafting with the HTML, it > will mean drafting gets fixed in the HTML a lot sooner. > > Also I have been asked to add other status' to allow documentation to be > marked as beta/alpha/RC etc, this is easy in the HTML but requires the > same rewrite as for the beta status in the PDF. > > All comments welcome. No comments, so I guess this means I can do whatever I want! w00t! Since I have only ever heard of draft used in the context of an entire document, I think that is all we should support. One way to get a chapter or section reviewed is to add a remark to the title of the block saying to review it. e.g. <section> <title><remark>%% REVIEW ME %%</remark>Big section on sectioning sections This gets the remark in the TOC if you have remarks enabled, so it's pretty obvious to readers where to go to review. It's even highlighted! I am still accepting comments!!!!!111 Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From jaredsmith at jaredsmith.net Tue Nov 11 01:31:29 2008 From: jaredsmith at jaredsmith.net (Jared Smith) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:31:29 -0600 Subject: [publican-list] Oddities with draft settings In-Reply-To: <4918DF84.3090607@redhat.com> References: <4906BB69.3020100@redhat.com> <4918DF84.3090607@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1226367089.3802.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 11:27 +1000, Jeff Fearn wrote: > Since I have only ever heard of draft used in the context of an entire document, I think that is all we should support. I'm fine with that. I've only ever used it in scope of an entire document as well. -Jared Smith From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 04:41:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:41:57 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 470967] New: sub-title is used as the menu item for books Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: sub-title is used as the menu item for books https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470967 Summary: sub-title is used as the menu item for books Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: dmison at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Description of problem: When a cocument RPM is installed the title of the GNOME menu item for that book Book is the sub-title of the book, not the title. It should be the book title. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.38 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. in Book_info.xml The Hobbit Or there and back again 2. make web-brew-en-US 3. download rpm, install & check menu Actual results: GNOME menu item title is: "Or there and back again" Expected results: GNOME menu item title is: "The Hobbit" Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:49:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:49:47 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471144] New: RFE: please support function tag Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: RFE: please support function tag https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471144 Summary: RFE: please support function tag Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: rlerch at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Description of problem: MyFunction() Result: *WARNING: Unknown tag: function* This tag may not be displayed correctly, may generate invalid xhtml, or may breach Section 508 Accessibility standards. This renders fine on HTML, HTML-Single and PDF. The HTML validates also. Attached is a tarball of a built test book of this tag in use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 01:44:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:44:22 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471144] RFE: please support function tag In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120144.mAC1iM15029357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471144 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-11 20:44:21 EDT --- Added function to list of validated tags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 04:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:00:45 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471144] RFE: please support function tag In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120400.mAC40jMr026965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471144 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 04:17:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:17:43 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 470967] sub-title is used as the menu item for books In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120417.mAC4Hhol029658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470967 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-11 23:17:42 EDT --- Changed display name to "product productnumber: title" Changed popup text to "subtitle" This format was chosen because: 1: It is valid to have have the same book from multiple versions of a product installed. e.g. You can have the Deployment Guide for RHDS 7.1 and RHDS 8.0 installed at the same time. 2: It is also valid to use the same title for books from multiple products. e.g. It is valid for RHDS and RHEL to both have a book named Deployment Guide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 01:29:10 2008 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:29:10 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Different approach to banning tags and attributes Message-ID: <491B82E6.1060704@redhat.com> Hi everybody! I have been thinking about the approach taken to banning tags and attributes and think I have a better way of doing this that the current process. I'm thinking that making our own DTD that is a subset of the DocBook DTD would be a better approach. This would allow people using validating editors, like Kate and Emacs, to limit what tags and attributes they are using when writing documents, instead of having to wait until they try to build them. Making it a subset ensures that publican based books can build in any other DocBook tool chain. Doing this is actually pretty easy to do, see http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ch05.html Here is an example of a DTD which removes the olink tag, but supports everything else in the DocBook 4.5 DTD: --- START DTD ---- %orig-docbook; --- END DTD --- It gets a little more complicated to remove attributes from a tag and keep the tag, but it's not greatly complex. It's possibly we could switch DTDs on either a brand or per book basis as well, just in case a brand wanted to support those tags we don't want to support. Discuss! Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From lbrindle at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 01:31:46 2008 From: lbrindle at redhat.com (Lana Brindley) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:31:46 +1100 Subject: [publican-list] Different approach to banning tags and attributes In-Reply-To: <491B82E6.1060704@redhat.com> References: <491B82E6.1060704@redhat.com> Message-ID: <491B8382.9060801@redhat.com> Jeff Fearn wrote: > Hi everybody! > > I have been thinking about the approach taken to banning tags and > attributes and think I have a better way of doing this that the current > process. > > I'm thinking that making our own DTD that is a subset of the DocBook DTD > would be a better approach. This would allow people using validating > editors, like Kate and Emacs, to limit what tags and attributes they are > using when writing documents, instead of having to wait until they try > to build them. > > Making it a subset ensures that publican based books can build in any > other DocBook tool chain. > > Doing this is actually pretty easy to do, see > http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ch05.html > > Here is an example of a DTD which removes the olink tag, but supports > everything else in the DocBook 4.5 DTD: > > --- START DTD ---- > > > > "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd"> > %orig-docbook; > > --- END DTD --- > > It gets a little more complicated to remove attributes from a tag and > keep the tag, but it's not greatly complex. > > It's possibly we could switch DTDs on either a brand or per book basis > as well, just in case a brand wanted to support those tags we don't want > to support. > > Discuss! > > Cheers, Jeff. > +1 Signed, a Kate user :) L -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: lbrindle.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 976 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 05:41:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:41:28 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 461864] Add and to list of "known tags" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130541.mAD5fSIr008115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461864 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-13 00:41:28 EDT --- Validate function output. Banned glosslist as it can not be translated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 05:39:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:39:40 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 461870] Update list of known tags In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130539.mAD5delR007580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461870 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-13 00:39:40 EDT --- Validated uri, mousebutton & hardware outputs. Please open another bug for stepalternatives as it requires major changes to validate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 05:42:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:42:05 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 461708] unsupported "developer content relevant" tags In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130542.mAD5g5VB016928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461708 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-13 00:42:04 EDT --- Validated output of type, methodname, exceptionname, varname, interfacename. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 07:11:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:11:23 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 469298] RFE: Improve support for tags In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130711.mAD7BNAC022514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469298 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-13 02:11:22 EDT --- Removed collab from cover page to match PDF and other output formats. Collab should only be used to denote authors of referenced works in a book's bibliography. Please use othercredit (with an appropriate role) to detail significant non-authorial contributions to a book. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 01:11:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:11:11 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 468316] RFE: Need an online help brand in Publican. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140111.mAE1BBNf018116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468316 Susan Burgess changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cpelland at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 01:24:51 2008 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:24:51 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Different approach to banning tags and attributes In-Reply-To: <491CCE7A.2090105@redhat.com> References: <491B82E6.1060704@redhat.com> <491CCE7A.2090105@redhat.com> Message-ID: <491CD363.80508@redhat.com> David O'Brien wrote: > Jeff Fearn wrote: >> Hi everybody! >> >> I have been thinking about the approach taken to banning tags and >> attributes and think I have a better way of doing this that the >> current process. >> >> I'm thinking that making our own DTD that is a subset of the DocBook >> DTD would be a better approach. This would allow people using >> validating editors, like Kate and Emacs, to limit what tags and >> attributes they are using when writing documents, instead of having to >> wait until they try to build them. >> >> Making it a subset ensures that publican based books can build in any >> other DocBook tool chain. >> >> Doing this is actually pretty easy to do, see >> http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ch05.html >> >> Here is an example of a DTD which removes the olink tag, but supports >> everything else in the DocBook 4.5 DTD: >> >> --- START DTD ---- >> >> >> >> > "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd"> >> %orig-docbook; >> >> --- END DTD --- >> >> It gets a little more complicated to remove attributes from a tag and >> keep the tag, but it's not greatly complex. >> >> It's possibly we could switch DTDs on either a brand or per book basis >> as well, just in case a brand wanted to support those tags we don't >> want to support. >> >> Discuss! >> >> Cheers, Jeff. >> > The idea is fine. Sounds like a reasonable way to get rid of some > "noise" when marking up doc. > > Who will own the DTD, and be responsible for what is included or not? The publican team, in consultation with the publican community. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 02:51:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:51:28 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 468305]
ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140251.mAE2pS80001382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468305 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |publican-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 02:52:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:52:19 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 468305]
ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140252.mAE2qJ7e001444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468305 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-13 21:52:18 EDT --- After discussion on the list it was decided that publican would only support draft mode at the document level. Modified XSL to set draft mode on root node status, fixed HTML and PDF not displaying DRAFT watermark correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 02:09:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:09:35 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471703] RFE: new "make" target that does not use 98-100% CPU In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811150209.mAF29ZFa028275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471703 --- Comment #1 from Murray McAllister 2008-11-14 21:09:34 EDT --- * "...does not have to be a new "make" target - ..." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 02:07:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:07:18 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471703] New: RFE: new "make" target that does not use 98-100% CPU Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: RFE: new "make" target that does not use 98-100% CPU https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471703 Summary: RFE: new "make" target that does not use 98-100% CPU Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: mmcallis at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat I would like a new "make" targeted that does not use between 98% and 100% CPU. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): * publican-0.38-0 Additional info: After thinking this over, I decided that it does not have to be a new "make" targeted - feel free to change existing targets to use less CPU. "make test" does not count. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 05:33:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:33:16 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471776] New: create_book --article does not work. Please remove from help. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: create_book --article does not work. Please remove from help. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471776 Summary: create_book --article does not work. Please remove from help. Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: mmcallis at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Created an attachment (id=323710) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323710) Patch to remove "--article" and update --help output Description of problem: The following do not work, and both result in printing the help: create_book --article blah create_book --article --name blah Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): * publican-0.38-0.el5 Steps to Reproduce: 1. create_book --help 2. wonder if "--article" works. 3. run create_book --article 4. read 5. profit. Expected results: I think --article should be removed from the man page, and the man page made more clear about how to make an article. See attached patch. Made sure output was clean/in line in "create_book --help" and "create_book -man". Booyakasha. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 05:40:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:40:56 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471776] create_book --article does not work. Please remove from help. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811160540.mAG5eu3O009441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471776 --- Comment #1 from Murray McAllister 2008-11-16 00:40:55 EDT --- I guess "--name My_Article" should be "--name Article_Name", as per . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 21:43:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:43:00 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471776] create_book --article does not work. Please remove from help. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162143.mAGLh0ZG005305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471776 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-16 16:42:59 EDT --- Removed old help text from create_book and make type case insensitive. Proper command is: create_book --name=The_Article_Of_Doom --type=Article -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 23:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:30:40 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 461076] revise publican-jboss legal notice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162330.mAGNUe4B022460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461076 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|jfearn at redhat.com, | |publican-list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 23:31:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:31:13 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 453246] Linux trademark attribution for legal notice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162331.mAGNVDUu031153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453246 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|jfearn at redhat.com, | |publican-list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 04:28:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:28:00 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471703] RFE: new "make" target that does not use 98-100% CPU In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170428.mAH4S0Ku006156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471703 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |mhideo at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-16 23:28:00 EDT --- Doing anything about the performance really requires the make files to be rewritten in a proper programming language. This would take about 3 weeks to complete. One side affect of doing this would be that each books make file would need to be converted to a suitable configuration file. e.g. a conf, ini or xml file. Doing this would make the creation of a GUI, or integrating the build in an editing tool, easier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 04:42:52 2008 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:42:52 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Policy Question: When to release? Message-ID: <4920F64C.4020404@redhat.com> Hi ho :) I'm wondering if we should have a policy on when to release a new version? Obviously if there was a security bug we'd push a new release a.s.a.p. At what point should we push a new version for cumulative fixes? It can take quite a while for revisions to get through the fedora updates process, so it hasn't been that long since most users got 0.38. Here is the current fix list since 0.38. * Fri Oct 17 2008 Jeff Fearn 0.39 - Disable make.graphic.viewport. BZ #467368 - Add missing XEP namespace. BZ #467256 - Add catch for ValidateTables where table for tgroup could not be found. BZ #468789 - Fix right margin error on verbatim and admonitions in PDF. BZ #467654 - Added foreignphrase to list of validated tags. - Add foreignphrase, acronym, hardware to list of tags aspell should ignore. - Fixed left align of verbatim items in notes. - Fixed contrib class in CSS. BZ #469595 - Changed para & simpara to div in HTML. BZ #469286 - Fix layout of author in Revision History. BZ #469986 - Validated function tag. BZ #471144 - Fixed menu entry text. BZ #470967 - Validated type, methodname, exceptionname, varname, interfacename tags. BZ #461708 - Banned glosslist (untranslatable) BZ #461864 - Validated uri, mousebutton, hardware tags. BZ #461870 - Validated othername tag. BZ #464315 - Removed collab from front page to match PDF output. BZ #469298 - Formalised handling of draft mode, root node only. BZ #468305 - Removed old help text from create_book and make type case insensitive. BZ #471776 Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From foss.mailinglists at gmail.com Mon Nov 17 07:07:36 2008 From: foss.mailinglists at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?IlNhbmthcnNoYW4gKOCmuOCmmeCnjeCmleCmsOCnjeCmt+Cmoyki?=) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:37:36 +0530 Subject: [publican-list] Policy Question: When to release? In-Reply-To: <4920F64C.4020404@redhat.com> References: <4920F64C.4020404@redhat.com> Message-ID: <49211838.60706@gmail.com> Jeff Fearn wrote: > Obviously if there was a security bug we'd push a new release a.s.a.p. > At what point should we push a new version for cumulative fixes? Rule of thumb is when the effect of the cumulative fixes lead to an enhanced (or, improved but different) user experience in terms of using and consuming the tool - it might be a good idea to release a version. No hard and fast rule though. Developers/Maintainers tend to bump a version out once there are significant improvements in place. -- http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 01:41:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:41:17 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471988] New: [Feature request] beta and alpha productnumber values Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Feature request] beta and alpha productnumber values https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471988 Summary: [Feature request] beta and alpha productnumber values Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: ccurran at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Description of problem: Some products have ambiguous beta version names, some have downright crazy release schedules and some have written codenames for prerelease versions. In order to make maintainable beta versions which can be uploaded to the staging server in a sane fashion (ie not emailing release engineering 3 times a week) I propose that strings not entirely made up of numbers default to a productnumber value of zero. Using productnumber=0 presently works displaying a value of 0 in the title field. This feature request propose that the text in productnumber be written to the title field and the number 0 is used for the RPM file and brew values. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): .38 Additional info: Should be an easy feature to add and Brian has agreed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 22:39:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:39:56 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 462668] PDF: inconsistent numbering for ulinks and footnotes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182239.mAIMdutX003328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462668 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfearn at redhat.com AssignedTo|bforte at redhat.com |jfearn at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-18 17:39:55 EDT --- This bug affects other uses of multiple references at the same location. compare 'Table 3.1. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Kernels' on page 16 of http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Hardware_Certification/5.2.2/pdf/Policy_Guide/Policy_Guide.pdf page to http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Hardware_Certification/5.2.2/html/Policy_Guide/sect-Policy_Guide-Hardware_Certification_Policies-Software_Policies.html#form-Policy_Guide-Software_Policies-Kernels -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 01:35:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:35:24 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 462668] PDF: inconsistent numbering for ulinks and footnotes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190135.mAJ1ZOsV002117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462668 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-18 20:35:23 EDT --- Resized footnote ref number and added padding to prevent numbers collapsing together. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 07:20:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:20:09 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471988] [Feature request] beta and alpha productnumber values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190720.mAJ7K9kH031920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471988 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-19 02:20:08 EDT --- I don't like this approach, if someone makes a typo in productnumber then PROD_VERSION gets set to a value they aren't expecting. I think it would be better to allow users to override PROD_VERSION in the books Makefile. The list of values we might consider letting people override are: DOCNAME (from title) PRODUCT (from productname) PROD_VERSION (from productnumber) RPM_VERSION (from edition) RPM_RELEASE (from pubsnumber) We would still enforce the current validity checks on these over ridden values, but not on the xml fields. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 07:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:43:35 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471988] [Feature request] beta and alpha productnumber values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190743.mAJ7hZCu004873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471988 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Curran 2008-11-19 02:43:34 EDT --- it's a fix. Sounds good. Make it so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 01:44:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:44:47 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 472319] New: Multiple tags in cause PDF to render box strangely Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Multiple tags in cause PDF to render box strangely https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472319 Summary: Multiple tags in cause PDF to render box strangely Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: lbrindle at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Created an attachment (id=324131) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324131) See example 8.1 on page 42 Description of problem: When using more than one tag inside an , the HTML renders OK, but the PDF creates a box with a jagged right edge. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -qa publican publican-0.38-0.el5 How reproducible: Every time I've tried it. Additional info: In the attachment, see Example 8.1 on page 42 for an example of this behaviour (as well as an example ACL file, in case you're interested). LKB -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 01:58:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:58:01 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 467654] corners missing on when it contains or In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200158.mAK1w1XK022968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467654 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lbrindle at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-19 20:57:59 EDT --- *** Bug 472319 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 01:58:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:58:00 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 472319] Multiple tags in cause PDF to render box strangely In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200158.mAK1w0Ku022943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472319 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-19 20:57:59 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 467654 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ccurran at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 06:24:23 2008 From: ccurran at redhat.com (Christopher Curran) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:24:23 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Docbook XML to manpages? Message-ID: <49250297.9020304@redhat.com> Can we build manpages with publican at the moment? Can this be a feature add if it's not there yet? Chris From lbrindle at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 22:23:07 2008 From: lbrindle at redhat.com (Lana Brindley) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:23:07 +1100 Subject: [publican-list] Docbook XML to manpages? In-Reply-To: <49250297.9020304@redhat.com> References: <49250297.9020304@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4925E34B.7010707@redhat.com> Christopher Curran wrote: > Can we build manpages with publican at the moment? Can this be a feature > add if it's not there yet? > > Chris > Oooh - I know some devs who would love for me to able to do this for them :) Thanks, Lana -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: lbrindle.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 976 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mmcallis at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 22:27:16 2008 From: mmcallis at redhat.com (Murray McAllister) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:27:16 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Docbook XML to manpages? In-Reply-To: <49250297.9020304@redhat.com> References: <49250297.9020304@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4925E444.6090800@redhat.com> Christopher Curran wrote: > Can we build manpages with publican at the moment? Can this be a feature > add if it's not there yet? > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > publican-list mailing list > publican-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican Dominick Grift helped me with this. Try: groff -Tascii -man file-you-want-to-edit From lbrindle at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 22:29:35 2008 From: lbrindle at redhat.com (Lana Brindley) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:29:35 +1100 Subject: [publican-list] Docbook XML to manpages? In-Reply-To: <4925E444.6090800@redhat.com> References: <49250297.9020304@redhat.com> <4925E444.6090800@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4925E4CF.8010908@redhat.com> Murray McAllister wrote: > Christopher Curran wrote: >> Can we build manpages with publican at the moment? Can this be a >> feature add if it's not there yet? >> >> Chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> publican-list mailing list >> publican-list at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list >> Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican > Dominick Grift helped me with this. Try: > > groff -Tascii -man file-you-want-to-edit > Does that work on pages written in docbook xml? L -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: lbrindle.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 976 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mmcallis at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 23:04:38 2008 From: mmcallis at redhat.com (Murray McAllister) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:04:38 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Docbook XML to manpages? In-Reply-To: <4925E4CF.8010908@redhat.com> References: <49250297.9020304@redhat.com> <4925E444.6090800@redhat.com> <4925E4CF.8010908@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4925ED06.5060309@redhat.com> Lana Brindley wrote: > Murray McAllister wrote: >> Christopher Curran wrote: >>> Can we build manpages with publican at the moment? Can this be a >>> feature add if it's not there yet? >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> publican-list mailing list >>> publican-list at redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list >>> Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican >> Dominick Grift helped me with this. Try: >> >> groff -Tascii -man file-you-want-to-edit >> > > Does that work on pages written in docbook xml? > > L > Why would man pages be written in XML, and why inflict such pain on people who have to write them ;) From jfearn at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 23:08:10 2008 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:08:10 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Docbook XML to manpages? In-Reply-To: <49250297.9020304@redhat.com> References: <49250297.9020304@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4925EDDA.1010909@redhat.com> Christopher Curran wrote: > Can we build manpages with publican at the moment? No. There is rudimentary support in the default style sheets though, you may want to give this a try. xmlto man > Can this be a feature > add if it's not there yet? This is purely time dependent. Open a bug, I'll estimate the time and the time allocation dice get rolled. It would be nice to get a complete man page in docboook format attached, or a book containing such a page referenced. see: http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/refentry.html Is this for stand alone man pages? Or man pages embedded in a document (so it's in the PDF etc) and installed as man pages? Cheers, Jeff. From lbrindle at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 23:32:29 2008 From: lbrindle at redhat.com (Lana Brindley) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:32:29 +1100 Subject: [publican-list] Docbook XML to manpages? In-Reply-To: <4925ED06.5060309@redhat.com> References: <49250297.9020304@redhat.com> <4925E444.6090800@redhat.com> <4925E4CF.8010908@redhat.com> <4925ED06.5060309@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4925F38D.2020202@redhat.com> Murray McAllister wrote: > Lana Brindley wrote: >> Murray McAllister wrote: >>> Christopher Curran wrote: >>>> Can we build manpages with publican at the moment? Can this be a >>>> feature add if it's not there yet? >>>> >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> publican-list mailing list >>>> publican-list at redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list >>>> Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican >>> Dominick Grift helped me with this. Try: >>> >>> groff -Tascii -man file-you-want-to-edit >>> >> >> Does that work on pages written in docbook xml? >> >> L >> > Why would man pages be written in XML, and why inflict such pain on > people who have to write them ;) > > True enough, but the fact remains that people ask me to write man pages, and I know Docbook XML. Therefore, it would be nice to able to write them in that. Unless of course, we're going to be moving to LaTeX any time soon (which would warm my little TeXy heart, but is wholly unlikely to happen). L -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: lbrindle.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 976 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 04:07:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:07:53 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 472482] New: results in a warning Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: results in a warning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472482 Summary: results in a warning Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: lbrindle at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Description of problem: Using results in a warning stating: *WARNING: Unvalidated tag: qandadiv* This tag may not be displayed correctly, may generate invalid xhtml, or may breach Section 508 Accessibility standards. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -qa publican publican-0.38-0.el5 How reproducible: Every time I've tried Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create an FAQ that is divided with tags 2. Make your favourite output 3. See Error 4. ??? 5. Profit Actual results: *WARNING: Unvalidated tag: qandadiv* This tag may not be displayed correctly, may generate invalid xhtml, or may breach Section 508 Accessibility standards. Expected results: Error-free goodness Additional info: See output at http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_MRG/1.1/html/Grid_User_Guide/chap-Grid_User_Guide-Frequently_Asked_Questions.html for further proof that this tag won't actually break anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 07:12:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:12:31 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 472500] New: java annotations in sample code causes problems for Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: java annotations in sample code causes problems for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472500 Summary: java annotations in sample code causes problems for Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: dmison at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Description of problem: The syntax-highlighting seems to know what annotations in java source code are but doesn't know how to mark them up & leaves tags around them. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.38 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1 - specify language="java" for a programlisting containing annotations. Doesn't matter if it is inline code or included via xi:include @Publish(WebserviceContractPublisher.class) public class SOAPProcessor extends AbstractActionPipelineProcessor { // ... } Actual results: @Publish(WebserviceContractPublisher.class) public class SOAPProcessor extends AbstractActionPipelineProcessor { // ... } Expected results: @Publish(WebserviceContractPublisher.class) public class SOAPProcessor extends AbstractActionPipelineProcessor { // ... } Additional info: log output when building html Element annotation in namespace 'http://xslthl.sf.net' encountered, but no template matches. log output when building pdf xslthl:annotation encountered, but no template matches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 01:20:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:20:18 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 472611] New: PDF: bad spacing in Revision_History Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: PDF: bad spacing in Revision_History https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472611 Summary: PDF: bad spacing in Revision_History Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: mmcallis at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Created an attachment (id=324390) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324390) revision history spacing in PDF Description of problem: There is no space between the author's first and last name, or email address. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): * publican-0.38-0.el5 How reproducible: Always Actual results: See attached. Additional info: Looks good in HTML. source: svn co http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/selinuxguide My Revision_History.xml: Revision History 1.0 Tuesday November 25 2008 Murray McAllister mmcallis at redhat.com Initial content release on -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 02:10:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:10:17 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 472627] New: HTML: black square on screen when using "Next" and "Previous" to navigate Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: HTML: black square on screen when using "Next" and "Previous" to navigate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472627 Summary: HTML: black square on screen when using "Next" and "Previous" to navigate Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: mmcallis at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Created an attachment (id=324393) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324393) black mark in HTML output Description of problem: Clicking "Next" or "Previous" produces a black square on the screen, above the "Next" or "Previous" navigation buttons. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): * publican-0.38-0.el5 * publican-fedora-0.15-0.el5 * publican-redhat-0.15-0.el5 How reproducible: Always. Tested with "fedora" and "RedHat" brands. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Build a book in HTML. 2. Click Next (see black square above navigation button). 3. Use the browser's "back" button to see black mark (without it disappearing). Additional info: See attached. Viewed in Mozilla Firefox 3 as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 and Fedora Rawhide. svn co http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/selinuxguide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:33:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:33:29 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 472627] HTML: black square on screen when using "Next" and "Previous" to navigate In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230433.mAN4XTpF032565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472627 --- Comment #1 from Murray McAllister 2008-11-22 23:33:29 EDT --- Issue does not occur in Konqueror as shipped with kdebase-3.5.4-18.el5. Issue occurs in Epiphany as shipped with epiphany-2.24.1-2.fc10.i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 22:20:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:20:51 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 469986] pdf display of revision history lacks spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811232220.mANMKpCf012151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469986 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcallis at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-23 17:20:50 EDT --- *** Bug 472611 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 22:20:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:20:51 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 472611] PDF: bad spacing in Revision_History In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811232220.mANMKpX1012130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472611 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-23 17:20:50 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 469986 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 00:02:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:02:29 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 472500] java annotations in sample code causes problems for In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240002.mAO02TOQ029911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472500 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-23 19:02:28 EDT --- Added handling of xslthl:annotation to PDF and XHTML outputs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 01:47:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:47:29 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 472482] results in a warning In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240147.mAO1lTfP016231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472482 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-23 20:47:28 EDT --- Tweaked white space, validated XHTML output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 04:01:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:01:02 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 472627] HTML: black square on screen when using "Next" and "Previous" to navigate In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240401.mAO4123S003854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472627 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.39 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-23 23:01:01 EDT --- Bug was caused by odd way Firefox renders blocks, changed links to inline and modified CSS to replicate display. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:10:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:10:02 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471988] [Feature request] beta and alpha productnumber values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240510.mAO5A2VU015976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471988 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-24 00:10:01 EDT --- After talking with Brian we agreed that the correct solution for this issue is to add a remark to the subtitle tag, enable remarks and use the other fields as normal. e.g in en-US/Book_Info.xml: Everything in a nutshell 1.1 BETA 2 in Makefile: SHOW_REMARKS = 1 This displays the software's status in a clear, public location and ensures there is no ambiguity in the RPM subsystem's operation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 06:27:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:27:06 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 461711] Enable use of apostrophes in tags In-Reply-To: <bug-461711-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461711-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811240627.mAO6R6tQ027918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461711 Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> 2008-11-24 01:27:05 EDT --- This modification will not be made because it will lead to confusing changes in the RPM subsystem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 04:19:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:19:49 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 466067] Remove stated methodolgy for writing procedures from Typographic Conventions In-Reply-To: <bug-466067-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-466067-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811250419.mAP4Jnra023261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466067 Michael Hideo <mhideo at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |mhideo at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 02:47:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:47:32 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473013] New: MIA Footnotes in PDF Message-ID: <bug-473013-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: MIA Footnotes in PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473013 Summary: MIA Footnotes in PDF Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: lbrindle at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Created an attachment (id=324685) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324685) See "Important" admonition in Section 2.2 (page 5). Description of problem: PDF generates a link with a footnote for an <xref ulink= ...>, but the footnotes don't always appear at the end of a page Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ]$ rpm -qa publican publican-0.38-0.el5 How reproducible: Only just noticed it. Further testing needed. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create document containing an <xref ulink= ...> 2. make pdf-en-US 3. See missing footnotes Actual results: No footnotes Expected results: Footnotes Additional info: In the attached PDF, note the "Important" admonition in Section 2.2 (page 5). The admonition contains a link to a website, and a footnote number 1. There is no corresponding footnote at the bottom of the page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 03:14:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:14:59 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473013] MIA Footnotes in PDF In-Reply-To: <bug-473013-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473013-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811260314.mAQ3Ex8W015625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473013 --- Comment #1 from Lana Brindley <lbrindle at redhat.com> 2008-11-25 22:14:59 EDT --- This also appears in that document in section 4.1 (page 13) both in the admonition and in the list titled "reporting a bug". LKB -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 03:38:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:38:50 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 462670] PDF: footnotes do not appear when inside itemized or ordered lists In-Reply-To: <bug-462670-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462670-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811260338.mAQ3cou0011123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462670 Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lbrindle at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> 2008-11-25 22:38:49 EDT --- *** Bug 473013 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 03:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:38:49 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473013] MIA Footnotes in PDF In-Reply-To: <bug-473013-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473013-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811260338.mAQ3cnKV011102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473013 Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> 2008-11-25 22:38:49 EDT --- This is the same issue as 462670, foot notes in blocks that are outside the normal space allocation routine can not add footnotes. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 462670 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 04:41:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:41:50 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473019] HTML: Author_Group "<orgname>" merged between "<surname>" and "<surname>" In-Reply-To: <bug-473019-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473019-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811260441.mAQ4foee021936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473019 Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |publican-list at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> 2008-11-25 23:41:50 EDT --- This is probably a bug in the docbook-xsl shipped in F10. Please post the output of `rpm -q docbook-style-xsl` -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 07:08:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:08:38 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473019] HTML: Author_Group "<orgname>" merged between "<surname>" and "<surname>" In-Reply-To: <bug-473019-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473019-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811260708.mAQ78cMm028089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473019 --- Comment #2 from Murray McAllister <mmcallis at redhat.com> 2008-11-26 02:08:37 EDT --- docbook-style-xsl-1.74.0-3.fc10.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mmcallis at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 22:22:28 2008 From: mmcallis at redhat.com (Murray McAllister) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:22:28 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Docbook XML to manpages? In-Reply-To: <4925F38D.2020202@redhat.com> References: <49250297.9020304@redhat.com> <4925E444.6090800@redhat.com> <4925E4CF.8010908@redhat.com> <4925ED06.5060309@redhat.com> <4925F38D.2020202@redhat.com> Message-ID: <492DCC24.8040109@redhat.com> <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2008-November/msg00229.html> From gbuday at gmail.com Thu Nov 27 06:30:19 2008 From: gbuday at gmail.com (Gergely Buday) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:30:19 +0100 Subject: [publican-list] creating man pages Message-ID: <90d975d30811262230m83d55bbwf8d85249a4a3d14@mail.gmail.com> Hi there, I'm now in a small project to create man pages and a txt file for historical reasons from the same source. xmlto seems to be a tool for that, but now I see that Publican gains acceptance in the Fedora community. I have seen the discussion in the archives of this list about the generation of man pages with Publican - as I understand this is not possible at the moment. What do you think, how much effort could it be to make it work? - Gergely From mhideo at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 08:00:01 2008 From: mhideo at redhat.com (Michael Hideo-Smith) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:00:01 -0500 (EST) Subject: [publican-list] creating man pages In-Reply-To: <90d975d30811262230m83d55bbwf8d85249a4a3d14@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <722400424.2475391227772801517.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> ----- "Gergely Buday" <gbuday at gmail.com> wrote: > From: "Gergely Buday" <gbuday at gmail.com> > To: publican-list at redhat.com > Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 4:30:19 PM GMT +10:00 Brisbane > Subject: [publican-list] creating man pages > > Hi there, > > I'm now in a small project to create man pages and a txt file for > historical reasons from the same source. xmlto seems to be a tool for > that, but now I see that Publican gains acceptance in the Fedora > community. > > I have seen the discussion in the archives of this list about the > generation of man pages with Publican - as I understand this is not > possible at the moment. What do you think, how much effort could it > be to make it work? > I agree that we should get a handle on how much work it would be to use publican to generate man pages. As well as having those man pages translated would be great for us in Japan. - Mike From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 22:04:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:04:35 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473350] New: boilerplate "gpg fingerprint" Message-ID: <bug-473350-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: boilerplate "gpg fingerprint" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473350 Summary: boilerplate "gpg fingerprint" Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: mhideo at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: mjc at redhat.com, publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Many years ago we added the GPG fingerprint of the security at redhat.com key to the boilerplate for all the manuals; the reason was that printed manuals would provide a way for folks to verify our key outside of the website and in physical form. We included it on the boxes for the same reason. Since then we've changed our signing key, and moved away from boxed products, and so I believe rather than update the text it probably should just be removed from the boilerplate so it's not included in future updates/new product docs. Thanks, Mark -- Mark J Cox / Red Hat Security Response Team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 22:51:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:51:13 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473350] boilerplate "gpg fingerprint" In-Reply-To: <bug-473350-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473350-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811272251.mARMpDQj013087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473350 Michael Hideo <mhideo at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Michael Hideo <mhideo at redhat.com> 2008-11-27 17:51:12 EDT --- done, setting to MODIFIED [mhideo at mhideo publican-redhat]$ svn ci -m"BZ#473350" publican-redhat.spec Enter passphrase for key '/home/mhideo/.ssh/id_rsa': Sending publican-redhat.spec Transmitting file data . Committed revision 586. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 22:54:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:54:09 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473350] boilerplate "gpg fingerprint" In-Reply-To: <bug-473350-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473350-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200811272254.mARMs9pL013329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473350 Michael Hideo <mhideo at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.16 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 00:29:40 2008 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:29:40 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] creating man pages In-Reply-To: <90d975d30811262230m83d55bbwf8d85249a4a3d14@mail.gmail.com> References: <90d975d30811262230m83d55bbwf8d85249a4a3d14@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <492F3B74.5070404@redhat.com> Gergely Buday wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm now in a small project to create man pages and a txt file for > historical reasons from the same source. xmlto seems to be a tool for > that, but now I see that Publican gains acceptance in the Fedora > community. > > I have seen the discussion in the archives of this list about the > generation of man pages with Publican - as I understand this is not > possible at the moment. What do you think, how much effort could it be > to make it work? Time depends on the use cases and functionality required. 1: Standalone man document. A: Modify create_book to handle --type=man B: Create a man template C: Modify packaging to ship man pages D: Validate XSLT output E: Handle multiple man pages in a single document 2: Man pages embedded in another document. A: Add logic to determine man pages B: Modify packaging to produce man sub-package[s?] C: Validate XSLT output Use case 2 would targeted embedding man pages in to a user or administrators guide as well as shipping them as man pages. Rough estimates would be: Use case 1 would require 3-5 days Use case 2 would require 5-8 days Both about two weeks Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 06:14:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:14:50 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473375] New: <screen> & <programlisting> in tables overhang the right side of their cell in PDF Message-ID: <bug-473375-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: <screen> & <programlisting> in tables overhang the right side of their cell in PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473375 Summary: <screen> & <programlisting> in tables overhang the right side of their cell in PDF Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: dmison at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Description of problem: <screen> & <programlisting> in table cells "overhang" to the right, either into the next cell or outside the table in PDF Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.38 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. <table><title>test table Database JDBC Driver java -jar SomeJar.jar some text here some text here someClass.someMethod(); 2. make clean pdf-en-US Actual results: The contents of both the and tags extend slighting beyond the righthand wall of their respective cells. Screenshot attached. Expected results: The contents should be contained in each cell with even cell padding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 21:55:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:55:17 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 467654] corners missing on when it contains or In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302155.mAULtH6x001420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467654 --- Comment #5 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-30 16:55:15 EDT --- *** Bug 473375 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 21:55:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:55:16 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473375] & in tables overhang the right side of their cell in PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302155.mAULtGjU001400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473375 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-30 16:55:15 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 467654 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 21:56:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:56:20 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473375] & in tables overhang the right side of their cell in PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302156.mAULuKH3027363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473375 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-30 16:56:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325150) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325150) example of output from pre-release publican -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 22:48:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:48:40 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473019] HTML: Author_Group "" merged between "" and "" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302248.mAUMme5S003107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473019 --- Comment #3 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-30 17:48:39 EDT --- This is a bug in the non-customised XSL and is therefore not a bug in Publican. You should transfer this bug to the appropriate Fedora component or open a bug upstream. Below is my discussion of the problem that has been introduced in to the common XSL, hopeful this will help the package maintainers resolve this issue for you. This issue is caused by a change to /usr/share/sgml/docbook/xsl-stylesheets-1.74.0/common/common.xsl Line 577 reads: The solution, IMHO, is to get a variable, which defaults off, added to that if statement. e.g. in params.xsl: in common.xsl: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 23:16:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:16:05 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 473350] boilerplate "gpg fingerprint" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302316.mAUNG5KR008014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473350 --- Comment #2 from Michael Hideo 2008-11-30 18:16:04 EDT --- jboss-brand has been done as well [mhideo at mhideo publican-jboss]$ svn ci -m"BZ#473350" Sending publican-jboss/en-US/Legal_Notice.xml Sending publican-jboss/publican-jboss.spec Transmitting file data .. Committed revision 588. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.