[publican-list] Advice please
Murray McAllister
mmcallis at redhat.com
Fri Oct 24 22:53:16 UTC 2008
Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>> It might be that Mike needs to move to a different construct, or use a
>> different tabling style. The goal is for visual parsing by humans,
>> right? That is, you aren't trying to use a table in the database sense,
>> correct?
>>
>> I'm thinking of stuff such as column and row spanning.
>>
>
> The goal is visual parsing by humans. Ideally it will look like something
> that people can print up, easily scan for each item and check it off as
> done. I've been looking a bit at variable lists too though it seems each
> varlistentry can only have one list item.
>
> -Mike
>
I'm not a design person, so this might be totally wrong. If you want to
check things off, you could try an orderedlist inside a variabelist:
<varlistentry><term>This is a varlist term</term>
<listitem>
<orderedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
Item 1
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Item 2
</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
When built it looks as such:
This is a varlist term
1. Item 1
2. Item 2
If you wanted more than one listitem, you can use an itemizedlist, but
this places a ">>" point next to each one. You can override what is used
with "itemizedlist mark=", but I couldn't figure out how to make the
mark disappear.
"An ItemizedList is a list in which every item is marked with a bullet,
dash, or other dingbat, or no mark at all."[1], so I guess it is possible.
Good luck!
[1] <http://docs.hp.com/en/B1171-90154/ch03s02.html>
More information about the publican-list
mailing list