[publican-list] [Bug 475684] Find solution for using Glossaries with publican

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475684





--- Comment #12 from Deon Lackey <dlackey at redhat.com>  2009-02-17 17:06:56 EDT ---
I don't particularly care about other people! So, can we please allow
glossaries? Is there an ETA for that, even for the glosslist compromise?

Glossaries are very useful, whether it's for new products like IPA or RH
Virtual Directory or long-standing and intricate products like RHEL itself.
They're a great reference for every level of user. I personally use them all
the time. That is my opinion. Your opinion is that they aren't worth the effort
because of the amount of time they take. Great. We have two opinions. 

Is it not possible simply to not translate the glossaries or to leave them out
of translated docs? It seems there can be a procedural resolution rather than
flat out prohibiting glossaries.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.