From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 01:42:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:42:15 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 496762] Lines run together in screen tags in PDF builds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170142.n5H1gFNh000949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496762 Michael Hideo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|urgent |medium Severity|urgent |medium --- Comment #3 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 21:42:14 EDT --- Hi Deon, Is this still relevant? If so, please provide me a link to the source for testing. - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 01:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:49:27 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 475684] Find solution for using Glossaries with publican In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170149.n5H1nRsn002160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475684 --- Comment #15 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 21:49:25 EDT --- Deon, Still awaiting disposition from blocker. - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 01:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:53:44 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 480730] text re make clean_ids in variable list of 3.5 Building a Book is incorrect. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170153.n5H1ri4n003389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480730 Michael Hideo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |mhideo at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 21:53:43 EDT --- Next version of publican works differently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 01:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:52:32 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 480721] Banned tags and translations considerations need to be added to Users Guide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170152.n5H1qWYB003245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480721 Michael Hideo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhideo at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 21:52:30 EDT --- Hi Brian, Can you please attach the XML file to this BZ? - Mike (In reply to comment #1) > Urtext for this is on the ECS wiki at > > > Note to self: bforte also has a ready-to-roll XML version of the above stored > locally: > ~/documents/red > hat/svn/Internal/5.0/Style_Guide/en-US/Which_XML_Tag_Should_I_Use.xml > > Other notes to add to this (from irc discussions with jfearn): > > All questions of the reasoning behind this aside, banning attributes like > xreflabel has the following practical consequence: > > > The Secret to Eternal Life > The secret to eternal life is? > > > [more deathless prose here] > > ?see >xref linkend="ch03"> for details. > > Will be transformed into HTML such that the displayed text of the resultant > anchor tag is and can only be ?Chapter 3: The Secret to Eternal Life?. > > That is, you can?t change the xref?s linkend title (so to speak). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 01:55:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:55:54 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 486520] Preface headings and revision history should use sentence caps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170155.n5H1ts90016249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486520 Michael Hideo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhideo at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 21:55:53 EDT --- Hi Murray, i can't seem to find this bug, can you give me an example pointer? - Mike (In reply to comment #0) > Description of problem: > > Preface does not use sentence caps: > > Preface > > 1. Document Conventions > > 1.1. Typographic Conventions > 1.2. Pull-quote Conventions > 1.3. Notes and Warnings > > 2. We Need Feedback! > > A. Revision History > > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > publican-0.42-0.el5 > > > Expected results: > Headings in Preface and Revision History should use sentence caps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 01:58:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:58:28 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 482784] RFE: Support refentry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170158.n5H1wSIs016484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482784 --- Comment #7 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 21:58:28 EDT --- Don can you test this with the latest version of publican that you are using? - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:06:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:06:23 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 491782] .xml and images in sub-directories break images in PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170206.n5H26NUf006095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491782 --- Comment #4 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 22:06:22 EDT --- Hi Darrin, is this still a problem with the latest release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:11:29 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492984] procedure steps are pulled onto next page and leave white space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170211.n5H2BTJW007133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492984 --- Comment #1 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 22:11:29 EDT --- adding to my list for QA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:16:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:16:22 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 494152] PDF: para tags in abstract are not honored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170216.n5H2GMnt020696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494152 --- Comment #1 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 22:16:22 EDT --- Adding to my QA list post docs.redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:15:52 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 494147] PDF: Articles do not include author information (orgdiv, orgname, etc) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170215.n5H2FqUO020616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494147 --- Comment #1 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 22:15:51 EDT --- Moving to my QA list post docs.redhat.com rebase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:17:14 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 495821] RFE: make test to return warnings/errors when images are missing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170217.n5H2HE2S008487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495821 --- Comment #1 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 22:17:13 EDT --- Will investigate this feature post docs.redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:19:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:19:47 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 502126] in html outputs has a border drawn around it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170219.n5H2JlUe021230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502126 --- Comment #1 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 22:19:46 EDT --- Adding to the QA run post docs.redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:20:13 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492964] New JBoss Logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170220.n5H2KDP9021649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492964 Michael Hideo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhideo at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 22:20:12 EDT --- Adding to QA run post docs.redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:22:25 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 494079] Article_Name.ent has "Article_Name.ent" in HOLDER ENTITY definition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170222.n5H2MPIh022089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494079 Michael Hideo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhideo at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 22:22:24 EDT --- Adding to QA run -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:22:34 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 491782] .xml and images in sub-directories break images in PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170222.n5H2MYWB009860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491782 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Ross 2009-06-16 22:22:34 EDT --- Still broken in publican-0.45-0.el5 eg. SEVERE: Image not found: PC_Setup/images/Vpn/WiFi-WEP.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:26:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:26:20 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 497462] feature request: smaller font size for code samples In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170226.n5H2QKTI023160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497462 --- Comment #1 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 22:26:19 EDT --- Leaving this for the QA run post docs.redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:30:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:30:38 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 479794] image quality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170230.n5H2UccD024301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479794 --- Comment #1 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 22:30:37 EDT --- Hi Dani, Can you attach a pdf example? - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:31:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:31:20 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471703] RFE: new "make" target that does not use 98-100% CPU In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170231.n5H2VKNH024438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471703 --- Comment #5 from Michael Hideo 2009-06-16 22:31:18 EDT --- This is being addressed. Stay tuned until post docs.redhat.com rebase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:31:04 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 506383] New: Entity year needs updating from 2008. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Entity year needs updating from 2008. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506383 Summary: Entity year needs updating from 2008. Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: mhideo at redhat.com ReportedBy: anross at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: Entity year is 2008 in all templates. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):publican-0.45-0.el5 How reproducible: Every time you create a book / article / set.create_book Steps to Reproduce: 1. create_book --name test 2. grep YEAR ./test/en-US/test.ent 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 04:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:02:46 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 486520] Preface headings and revision history should use sentence caps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170402.n5H42kBg010180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486520 David O'Brien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daobrien at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from David O'Brien 2009-06-17 00:02:46 EDT --- Why? All our headings have traditionally been in title caps (if you take title caps to exclude is, on, in, and, the, and similar words). Is there any reason for the Preface and Revision History demanding a different heading style? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 04:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:23:32 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 486520] Preface headings and revision history should use sentence caps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170423.n5H4NWZQ002188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486520 --- Comment #3 from Brian Forte 2009-06-17 00:23:30 EDT --- Title Case rules in English vary wildly. 1. ALL CAPS THE WATER DAMAGE IS IN HER FAUX ARMENIAN CATHEDRAL WING 2. Initial caps for everything: The Water Damage Is In Her Faux Armenian Cathedral Wing 3. Initial caps for everything, except non-initial articles, prepositions and conjunctions: The Water Damage Is in Her Faux Armenian Cathedral Wing 4. Initial caps for everything, except non-initial articles; prepositions; conjunctions & ?to be? forms: The Water Damage is in Her Faux Armenian Cathedral Wing 5. Initial caps for everything, except non-initial closed-class* The Water Damage is in her Faux Armenian Cathedral Wing 6. Initial caps for nouns and the 1st word: The Water Damage is in her faux Armenian Cathedral Wing 7. Standard sentence case (ie first word takes an initial cap as do proper nouns): The water damage is in her faux Armenian cathedral wing 8. all lowercase the water damage is in her faux armenian cathedral wing Of these eight, numbers five and seven are the most common. Very roughly speaking, style five is US editorial practice and style seven is Commonwealth editorial practice. It gets complicated, however. Even in places where style five above is the rule, long closed-class words (eg ?between?) sometimes taking an initial cap. The *New York Times* used a ?five with occasional long closed-class exceptions? style for many years, for example. And there are numerous UK publishers using style five (especially with the ?long closed-class words are a further exception? variation) and numerous US publishers using style seven. Also, scientific publishers, regardless of where they are, tend to stick with style seven (sentence case). ALL CAPS is generally a sign of very good or very poor typesetting and design, mostly the latter. It takes a real eye for type and presentation to make ALL CAPS titles work. More important, from our perspective, it takes typefaces we don?t use. All this is equally true for all lowercase titles. Initial Caps For Everything (two above) is mostly a sign of typesetter uncertainty. The person setting the type doesn?t know styles three, four, five or six even exist but does know that Titles Are Somehow Different To Standard Text When It Comes To Capitals. Consequently, and by way of obviating the problem, they stick Initial Caps on everything. The *New York Times* variant on style five noted above ? initial caps for everything, except non-initial closed class words, unless the non-initial closed-class word is particularly long ? is popular, albeit accidentally so. Most people using it are actually using a naive version of it: initial caps for everything except short words, unless the short words are nouns or names or the like. Given the complexity even the simplest of these rules introduce, the argument for sentence case is compelling. It reduces the editorial workload and doesn?t materially effect the look of the published material. The half-decent justification for anything other than sentence case is that titles are not contrasted clearly from body copy unless set otherwise. A better solution to that problem is to re-set the titles, not introduce complicated house rules that people will invariably forget. Titles in Red Hat books *are* set in clear and contrasting style, so we don?t have that half-decent justification for using other than standard sentence case. *?closed class? word types don?t get new members all that often. For example, prepositions, postpositions, determiners, conjunctions, & pronouns. Nouns and verbs, by contrast, are open class words, taking on new members all the bloody time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 04:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:55:08 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 486520] Preface headings and revision history should use sentence caps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170455.n5H4t8dn008019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486520 --- Comment #4 from David O'Brien 2009-06-17 00:55:07 EDT --- My question is why are we identifying Preface and Revision History? If we're going to introduce a new style for our books, look long and hard at the effect it's going to have, how much time and effort will be required, and for what gain, and discuss it with a number of people who are going to be involved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 17:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:31:30 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 475684] Find solution for using Glossaries with publican In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171731.n5HHVU1E020697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475684 --- Comment #16 from Deon Lackey 2009-06-17 13:31:28 EDT --- That's cool. The promise of a resolution being in the works is good for now. Thanks for keeping the bug updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 17:36:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:36:14 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 496762] Lines run together in screen tags in PDF builds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171736.n5HHaEpE021890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496762 --- Comment #4 from Deon Lackey 2009-06-17 13:36:13 EDT --- Hi, Mike. I think part of the problem was related to having inline formatted tags at the end of a line in screen. For example: This is my first line, with a variable tag at the end. It would all run together, but if I put a character at the end like  , then it worked as expected. This is my first line, with a variable   tag at the end. Now, the example I had attached in the original comment, that wasn't the case, yet it was still running together. But I don't know what was wrong then; I re-installed fop and publican in the interim (same versions), and now it's fine. I think you can close this, but I'll reopen and whine again if I need to. :) Thanks! Deon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 06:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:46:01 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 479794] image quality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260646.n5Q6k199004557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479794 --- Comment #2 from Ruediger Landmann 2009-06-26 02:46:01 EDT --- Dani -- take a look at Bug 508208 -- is this what you're talking about? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 05:53:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:53:30 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 491782] .xml and images in sub-directories break images in PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290553.n5T5rUY0005984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491782 --- Comment #6 from Darrin Mison 2009-06-29 01:53:29 EDT --- ah, yeah still broken. I'd modifed my pdf.xsl as per above & had to reinstall to check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.