From jfearn at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 00:10:41 2009 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:10:41 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] BZ 471703 RFE: new "make" target that does not use 98-100% CPU Message-ID: <49AB2401.5000005@redhat.com> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471703 There is a lot of overhead in processing make requests due to the number of templates used in the Makefiles. For each extra language you support in your book the start up cost is increased. It's currently very annoying on RHEL where there are 23 languages, on Fedora this could quickly become extremely painful due to the extra languages supported. The only real solution to fixing this is to move the logic in the common make files to programming language. I can't get time allocated at work to do this :( So it's either a hobby project for me, and that means I'd do it in the sweet joy that is Perl, or someone else can do it in some other language. From the writers perspective it would have two main effects. 1: The commands used to manipulate books would change from `make blah` to, probably, `publican --options` 2: The books Makefile will probably need to be changed to another format. From a support point it would mean that adding optional behaviour is easier, it's a pain in the bum to do that in a maintainable way in the current massive make files. Depending on the format of the config files it may lower the barrier to someone creating a GUI to handle building on the desk top. ------- Here is my, rather relaxed, proposal for my hobby project. Other people should feel free to propose alternative approaches they are prepared to deliver on. ------- Jeff's hobby time approach to porting publican. Approach: Use Perl, because I like it! Create a Publican module to contain config data. Create sub modules for each function. e.g. Publican::XmlClean Publican::Builder Publican::CreateBook ... Migrate required logic and drop any unused logic. Migrate all logic where possible to perl. There is currently: sh, sed, awk, perl, java. Some of the java stuff is unavoidable, but manageable since it is contained enough to be maintainable. Steps (the odd steps are not ordered): Create Publican module using Module::Starter::PBP Drink cider. Migrate xmlClean to Publican::XmlClean Drink cider. Migrate all the logic from Makefile.common and Makefile.templates to Publican::Builder Drink cider. Migrate create_book to Publican::CreateBook Drink cider. Create a publican script to act as an interface between the user and the Publican modules. Drink cider. Use Config::Simple to handle config files ... probably in html format, which looks like: xml_lang: en-US docname: The_Art_Of_Pants other_langs: de-DE en-FR Drink cider. Create a method of converting existing books from make to publican. Drink cider. Update brand packages to use new config format. Drink cider. Use Test::More, Test::Perl::Critic etc to create a decent suite of tests. Drink cider. Use Locale::Maketext::Gettext to localise warnings, errors & other output of the publican process. Drink cider. Package and ship. Join AA. Let me know what you think. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From jwulf at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 00:33:49 2009 From: jwulf at redhat.com (Joshua Wulf) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:33:49 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] BZ 471703 RFE: new "make" target that does not use 98-100% CPU In-Reply-To: <49AB2401.5000005@redhat.com> References: <49AB2401.5000005@redhat.com> Message-ID: <49AB296D.8040703@redhat.com> Jeff Fearn wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471703 > > There is a lot of overhead in processing make requests due to the > number of templates used in the Makefiles. For each extra language you > support in your book the start up cost is increased. It's currently > very annoying on RHEL where there are 23 languages, on Fedora this > could quickly become extremely painful due to the extra languages > supported. > > The only real solution to fixing this is to move the logic in the > common make files to programming language. I can't get time allocated > at work to do this :( So it's either a hobby project for me, and that > means I'd do it in the sweet joy that is Perl, or someone else can do > it in some other language. > > From the writers perspective it would have two main effects. > > 1: The commands used to manipulate books would change from `make blah` > to, probably, `publican --options` > > 2: The books Makefile will probably need to be changed to another format. > > From a support point it would mean that adding optional behaviour is > easier, it's a pain in the bum to do that in a maintainable way in the > current massive make files. > > Depending on the format of the config files it may lower the barrier > to someone creating a GUI to handle building on the desk top. > > ------- > > Here is my, rather relaxed, proposal for my hobby project. Other > people should feel free to propose alternative approaches they are > prepared to deliver on. > > ------- > > Jeff's hobby time approach to porting publican. > > Approach: > > Use Perl, because I like it! > > Create a Publican module to contain config data. > Create sub modules for each function. > > e.g. > Publican::XmlClean > Publican::Builder > Publican::CreateBook > ... > > Migrate required logic and drop any unused logic. > > Migrate all logic where possible to perl. There is currently: sh, sed, > awk, perl, java. Some of the java stuff is unavoidable, but manageable > since it is contained enough to be maintainable. > > > Steps (the odd steps are not ordered): > > Create Publican module using Module::Starter::PBP > > Drink cider. > > Migrate xmlClean to Publican::XmlClean > > Drink cider. > > Migrate all the logic from Makefile.common and Makefile.templates to > Publican::Builder > > Drink cider. > > Migrate create_book to Publican::CreateBook > > Drink cider. > > Create a publican script to act as an interface between the user and > the Publican modules. > > Drink cider. > > Use Config::Simple to handle config files ... probably in html format, > which looks like: > > xml_lang: en-US > docname: The_Art_Of_Pants > other_langs: de-DE en-FR > > Drink cider. > > Create a method of converting existing books from make to publican. > > Drink cider. > > Update brand packages to use new config format. > > Drink cider. > > Use Test::More, Test::Perl::Critic etc to create a decent suite of tests. > > Drink cider. > > Use Locale::Maketext::Gettext to localise warnings, errors & other > output of the publican process. > > Drink cider. > > Package and ship. > > Join AA. > > > Let me know what you think. > > Cheers, Jeff. > Sounds like a lot of cider... -- Joshua J Wulf Engineering Content Services Red Hat Asia Pacific eml: jwulf at redhat.com tel: +61 (0)7 3514 8140 mob: +61 (0)431 929 675 tmz: GMT +10 (0) - omit when dialling internationally From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 01:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:49:34 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 471703] RFE: new "make" target that does not use 98-100% CPU In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903020149.n221nYCM014322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471703 Douglas Silas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dhensley at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Douglas Silas 2009-03-01 20:49:34 EDT --- Or, similarly... prepForPublican = do wd ? liftIO $ getWorkingDirectory conts ? liftIO $ getDirectoryContents wd >>= return ? filter (? [".", ".."]) env ? ask state ? get if lit_Makefile ? conts then do outLine $ msgNoBuildFile wd retCode 1 fnNm else do mf ? parseMakefile `liftM` (liftIO $ readFile lit_Makefile) put state { makefile = Just mf , docLocation = lookup "XML_LANG" mf , docName = (flip addExtension $ ".xml") `liftM` (lookup "DOCNAME" mf)} retCode 0 fnNm where fnNm = "prepForPublican" msgNoBuildFile wd = docitErr ? fnNm ? ": " ? "a Makefile does not not exist in the current working directory: " ? wd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 02:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 22:55:39 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489243] New: duplicate footnotes in PDF Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: duplicate footnotes in PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489243 Summary: duplicate footnotes in PDF Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: dmison at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: If the same URL is repeated on a page it produces two identical footnotes. It would be nice if Publican could detect this and reuse the first footnote for the subsequent ones. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.42 How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. Add two elements that point to the same URL so they will appear on the same page. 2. Generate pdf Actual results: Two identical footnotes are produced Expected results: One footnote referred to by both. Additional info: The docbook element may be useful here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 05:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 01:33:16 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489249] New: in doesn't break over pages in PDF Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: in doesn't break over pages in PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489249 Summary: in doesn't break over pages in PDF Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: dmison at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: The tag doesn't split at page breaks if it is contained in an , it moves onto the next page (same behaviour as an image) if the content is less than one page. If the programlisting content is more than one page it runs off the bottom of the first page and disappears. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.42 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. add a ... near the bottom of the page so you would expect it to run onto the next page 2. build the pdf Actual results: Whole content is displayed on the 2nd page. Expected results: The content is split over the two pages. Steps to Reproduce: 1. add a ... near the bottom of the page so you would expect it to run onto the next page and the one after 2. build the pdf Actual results: The content runs off the bottom of the first page. Expected results: The content is split over the multiple pages. Additional info: I've only seen this with but suspect it would also do it with other content. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 06:47:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 02:47:14 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489243] duplicate footnotes in PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903090647.n296lE4R024707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489243 --- Comment #1 from Darrin Mison 2009-03-09 02:47:13 EDT --- by "nice" I mean "professional-looking" ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 00:07:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:07:45 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489626] New: Publican no longer allows for numbers in book titles Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Publican no longer allows for numbers in book titles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489626 Summary: Publican no longer allows for numbers in book titles Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.3 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: urgent Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: irooskov at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: mhideo at redhat.com, jwulf at redhat.com, irooskov at redhat.com, publican-list at redhat.com, dmison at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: 5.3 Description of problem: Publican no longer allows for numbers in book titles For the JBoss EAP the only way to distinguish between CP releases is by placing the version in the book title, this is because of Publican limitations with other fields. Now, with the latest update to Publican, this is not possible causing all prior documentation for the JBoss EAP unbuildable for customers. If this fix does stay then not only will past documentation not be buildable, but there will be no way to distinguish between CP releaes of JBoss products meaning that the documentation on redhat.com/docs (and in the new documentation website yet to be releaesd), every time there is a CP release the documentation will have to be over-written with the new versions for the current CP. This further means that documentation for CP releases other than the current release will no longer be avaliable to customers, which our customers have already remarked in the past as a situation that would be unacceptable. I understand that Red Hat Enterprise Linux does not encounter this issue and that JBoss should change their naming conventions, but that does not mean that it is going to happen and because of this we do have to support the JBoss may (at least for the moment) in order to support our customers. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Publican Version 0.43 Release 0.e15 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Checkout https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/docs/enterprise/4.2.6/Getting_Started 2. in a terminal type the command 'make html-en-US' 3. title error occurs and book no longer builds Actual results: The book does not build Expected results: Allow the book to build with numbers in the title. Additional info: I understand that this update to Publican is considered a fix, however it could do it before and did not affect anyone adversely so I cannot see any harm in allowing it to be able to do it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 02:47:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:47:09 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489626] Publican no longer allows for numbers in book titles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903110247.n2B2l9ra011619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489626 Lana Brindley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lbrindle at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Lana Brindley 2009-03-10 22:47:10 EDT --- +1 I use numbers in titles for relnotes. In MRG, any books (mostly relnotes) released for minor releases (x.y.z) get collapsed into the major release's directory (x.y). This means we need to able to specify which minor release the book is for. We can't have four books all titled "Release Notes" floating around in one directory. Using other naming conventions ("Release Notes Security Release"; "Release Notes Enhancement Release") is not only confusing for the customer and the maintainer, but also very limited in scope (When you already have a "Release Notes Security Release" for 1.1.1, what do you call the security release for 1.1.4?). LKB -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 03:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:50:33 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489626] Publican no longer allows for numbers in book titles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903110350.n2B3oXKv016221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489626 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2009-03-10 23:50:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > +1 > > I use numbers in titles for relnotes. In MRG, any books (mostly relnotes) > released for minor releases (x.y.z) get collapsed into the major release's > directory (x.y). This means we need to able to specify which minor release the > book is for. We can't have four books all titled "Release Notes" floating > around in one directory. Using other naming conventions ("Release Notes > Security Release"; "Release Notes Enhancement Release") is not only confusing > for the customer and the maintainer, but also very limited in scope (When you > already have a "Release Notes Security Release" for 1.1.1, what do you call the > security release for 1.1.4?). > > > > LKB Changing the name (title) for each revision means that users of the Desktop content will NOT get updated documentation when they upgrade because you are changing the package name. --- e.g. I install version 1.0 of foo + foo-release-notes I upgrade to foo 1.1; the release notes didn't get updated because the package name changed and I don't have the renamed package installed. Now the release notes I'm reading are out of synch with the program. --- In addition you are going to be incurring an increasing maintenance burden every z stream release. Each package you ship has to be maintained for 7 years, and because you are effectively forking the package every Z stream, that is one more package on your list for the next 7 years. This scenario is the reason this restriction was introduced. Over time it creates a massive, ongoing, unavoidable maintenance effort. Do you really want to have 7 versions of your release notes package in Bugzilla and have to port fixes between them? However, there are good reasons for allowing numbers in titles. Isaac, Brian and I cornered Mike and have this policy changed, so a patched version will be coming out soon. I'd seriously reconsider using this facility for the use you specified above. Cheers, Jeff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 23:09:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:09:01 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489626] Publican no longer allows for numbers in book titles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903112309.n2BN915R000927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489626 --- Comment #3 from Lana Brindley 2009-03-11 19:09:00 EDT --- Jeff, I really don't understand the point you're trying to make here. Why would having numbers in the title prevent users from getting the package? It appears as though they wouldn't get the package regardless, from your example. Also, as far as packages go, surely the package exists regardless of its title, and therefore needs maintenance? Sorry, I'm not trying to be facetious, I just don't understand, and would like to. If there's a better way of doing things, then I'm all for it! L -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 23:26:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:26:32 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489626] Publican no longer allows for numbers in book titles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903112326.n2BNQWvv007071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489626 --- Comment #4 from Jeff Fearn 2009-03-11 19:26:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Jeff, > > I really don't understand the point you're trying to make here. Why would > having numbers in the title prevent users from getting the package? It's about upgrading, when you change the name you have a new package; so they don't get updated content when they run yum update. > It appears > as though they wouldn't get the package regardless, from your example. "I install version 1.0 of foo + foo-release-notes" where foo-release-notes is your docs package. > Also, as > far as packages go, surely the package exists regardless of its title, and > therefore needs maintenance? If you update the content without changing the name you have 1 package to maintain, and you are actively maintaining it every release. If you rename it you have many packages to maintain and you have to ensure you back port any relevant fixes. Cheers, Jeff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 23:41:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:41:22 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489626] Publican no longer allows for numbers in book titles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903112341.n2BNfMjj006626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489626 --- Comment #5 from Lana Brindley 2009-03-11 19:41:21 EDT --- So you're suggesting that we should have one relnote per x.y release, and just change the content of it for every x.y.z release? Doesn't that cause a major problem with historical reference? What about if someone is running foo 1.1.1 and the only available relnotes are for foo 1.1.3 (Because the 1.1.1 relnotes got updated to 1.1.2 and then 1.1.3)? What about the circumstance where someone updates to 1.1.2, finds issues and rolls back to 1.1.1? How do they find out what potential issues they may be rediscovering by doing that? As for maintenance, they're relnotes - by definition, they only apply for that release (minor or otherwise), so there's not really an ongoing maintenance issue. I can see where the problem might lie in doing that with books, but that's why I don't do books like that ;) Unless I've completely missed your point (again)? L -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 06:30:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:30:24 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489626] Publican no longer allows for numbers in book titles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903120630.n2C6UObq017167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489626 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.44 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 03:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:29:08 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489243] duplicate footnotes in PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903160329.n2G3T8kG002928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489243 Brian Forte changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bforte at redhat.com AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |bforte at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 23:57:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:57:17 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 486501] html output does not display correctly in IE7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903182357.n2INvHBO032063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486501 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-18 19:57:13 EDT --- publican-fedora-0.18-0.fc10,publican-0.44-0.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-fedora-0.18-0.fc10,publican-0.44-0.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 23:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:56:59 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489626] Publican no longer allows for numbers in book titles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903182356.n2INuxho031964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489626 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-18 19:56:55 EDT --- publican-fedora-0.18-0.fc10,publican-0.44-0.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-fedora-0.18-0.fc10,publican-0.44-0.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 23:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:57:04 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 484628] Many warnings 'body-start() called from outside an fo:list-item' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903182357.n2INv4Ap032008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484628 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-18 19:57:00 EDT --- publican-fedora-0.18-0.fc10,publican-0.44-0.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-fedora-0.18-0.fc10,publican-0.44-0.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 23:57:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:57:09 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 485179] new Book_Info.po files have incorrect "Project-Id-Version", causing non en-US builds to fail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903182357.n2INv9ZL001350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485179 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-18 19:57:04 EDT --- publican-fedora-0.18-0.fc10,publican-0.44-0.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-fedora-0.18-0.fc10,publican-0.44-0.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 00:57:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:57:44 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 491241] New: Regression of publican bug #474077 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Regression of publican bug #474077 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491241 Summary: Regression of publican bug #474077 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: dmison at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: The bug in #474077 has reoccurred. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474077 I saw this in 0.41 & commented on #474077 then without thinking about the fact that it was closed. (stupid). I never built these docs with 0.40, so it may have been fixed in that release. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): publican-WebSite-obsoletes-0.97-0.el5_2 publican-fedora-0.18-0.el5 publican-redhat-0.19-0.el5 publican-0.44-0.el5 publican-ovirt-0.7-0.el5 publican-doc-0.44-0.el5 publican-gimp-0.5-2.el5 publican-jboss-0.18-0.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 06:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:38:55 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 491260] [ja-JP] Feedback.po for JBoss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903200638.n2K6ctUw001296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491260 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|publican-list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 06:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:38:35 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 491263] [publican-jboss/en-US/Feedback.xml] contains wrong information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903200638.n2K6cZUM001220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491263 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |publican-list at redhat.com Component|publican |publican Version|rawhide |5.4 Product|Fedora |Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |ecs-dev-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 06:39:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:39:09 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 491263] [publican-jboss/en-US/Feedback.xml] contains wrong information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903200639.n2K6d9LY030974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491263 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|publican-list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 02:25:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:25:35 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 491782] New: .xml and images in sub-directories break images in PDF Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: .xml and images in sub-directories break images in PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491782 Summary: .xml and images in sub-directories break images in PDF Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: dmison at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: if you have .xml files in a subdirectory of en-US and images in a subdirectory of en-US/images publican creates an incorrect path for the included image in the PDF. It works fine with the html output This is needed to try to maintain some source compatibility with some JBoss project docs Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.44 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. Paths: my_book/en-US/Chapter1/Section-A.xml my_book/images/Chapter/figure.png 2. within my_book/en-US/Chapter1/Section-A.xml
A
some figure
3. make clean pdf-en-US Actual results: No image in PDF and this error message: Mar 24, 2009 12:07:35 PM org.apache.fop.fo.flow.ExternalGraphic bind SEVERE: Image not found: Chapter-1/Chapter-1/images/Chapter-1/figure.png Mar 24, 2009 12:07:35 PM org.apache.fop.render.pdf.PDFRenderer putImage SEVERE: Image not found: Chapter-1/Chapter-1/images/Chapter-1/figure.png Expected results: Image in PDF Additional info: This can be worked around in the PDF by supplying the path as: ../../images/Chapter1/figure.png , but this breaks the html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 03:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:33:33 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 491782] .xml and images in sub-directories break images in PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903240333.n2O3XX6p009628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491782 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2009-03-23 23:33:15 EDT --- Could you test this for me on a some books? test1: with flat xml and flat images test2: with flat xml and nested images test3: with nested xml and flat images test4: with nested xml and nested images proposed change: edit: /usr/share/publican/pdf.xsl on line 58 change: keep.relative.image.uris from select="0" to select="1" FYI: Zero is the default in the DocBook xslt for FO output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 23:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:53:55 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492021] New: PDF page breaks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: PDF page breaks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492021 Summary: PDF page breaks Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: dcoulson at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Description of problem: There is currently no way of controlling where page breaks occur in pdf. This is causing a display issue to be reported, where steps have their corresponding screenshots displayed on the next page. I would like be able to control this so that I could either force page breaks or somehow tell publican to keep the text and image on the same page. This would make documents more user-friendly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): publican-0.41-3.el5 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. make pdf 2. 3. Actual results: page breaks are uncontrollable Expected results: n/a Additional info: Please contact me if there is any additional information you require. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 01:31:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:31:31 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492034] New: "files" directory not included in rpms Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: "files" directory not included in rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492034 Summary: "files" directory not included in rpms Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: smeehan at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Description of problem: Publican: Not including the "files" directory in rpms. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): publican-0.41-3.el5 How reproducible: "files" directory not present on staging, but has worked previously when building on redhat.com/docs. Steps to Reproduce: 1. make web-brew-en-US 2. 3. Actual results: When the book is built on staging the demo in the files directory are not available. Expected results: Should be able to navigate to demos in the "files" directory. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 01:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:52:30 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492021] PDF page breaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250152.n2P1qUgZ010823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492021 David O'Brien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daobrien at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from David O'Brien 2009-03-24 21:52:09 EDT --- I'll second this. I've also had reviewers asking about all the white space and/or empty pages. Some of it can be explained (end of chapters, etc.), but having a "keep with next" attribute or something similar available would be a bonus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 01:59:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:59:24 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492021] PDF page breaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250159.n2P1xOAJ011821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492021 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dcoulson at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2009-03-24 21:59:03 EDT --- Please include the SVN source location and the relevant page numbers in the PDF, so I can test this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 02:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:09:05 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492021] PDF page breaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250209.n2P295Xc003797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492021 Dani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dcoulson at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Dani 2009-03-24 22:08:44 EDT --- https://svn.devel.redhat.com/repos/ecs/SolidICE/4.2 Installation_Guide Pages 9-19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 03:25:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:25:23 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492034] "files" directory not included in rpms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250325.n2P3PNuj028713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492034 Michael Hideo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhideo at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Hideo 2009-03-24 23:25:02 EDT --- Hi Jeff, Also, when I do make tar-en-US and make srpm-en-US, when I troll through the tmp directories I do not see the contents in "files". When i run make html and make html-single, the "files" directory is there and contains the content. - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 04:38:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:38:06 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489249] in doesn't break over pages in PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250438.n2P4c688029711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489249 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2009-03-25 00:37:46 EDT --- This is a limitation of FOP. You will need to pull the programlisting outside the example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:07:30 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492021] PDF page breaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250507.n2P57UVI012372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492021 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.45 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Jeff Fearn 2009-03-25 01:07:08 EDT --- 0. await the patched Publican (version 0.45). It includes a change to the way steps inside procedures are presented. By default, all parts of a step are now kept together on a single page. NB: the presentation of listitems in orderedlists is unchanged. Consequently, the fix is as follows. 1. the orderedlist becomes a procedure as follows Execute the SolidICE Installer To run the SolidICE Installer, execute the required file: SolidIce_xxxxx.exe License File Import A valid license file may be provided either now or once the installation is complete. Click Browse to navigate to the location of the license file and then then click Next.
License File Import
2. no step in the procedure can be more than a page long. If a procedure is longer than a page, the text of the procedure runs off the end of the page and is unreadable. Also, the images either don't appear or are pushed off to the next page in the way they currently are in ordered lists. 3. Can you guess who wrote that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 00:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:01:30 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492021] PDF page breaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903260001.n2Q01UrT005609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492021 --- Comment #5 from David O'Brien 2009-03-25 20:01:07 EDT --- When you say "By default, all parts of a step are now kept together on a single page", does that mean there is a way to avoid that behaviour? I'm pretty sure I don't have any steps that are that long, but it seems that if I do these steps will now "break". Point #2 indicates that a procedure cannot be longer than a page. I thought we were talking about steps, not procedures. It wouldn't take very much to have a procedure go longer than one page, especially with a screenshot in the middle of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 00:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:23:47 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492021] PDF page breaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903260023.n2Q0NlQp002718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492021 --- Comment #6 from Jeff Fearn 2009-03-25 20:23:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > When you say "By default, all parts of a step are now kept together on a single > page", does that mean there is a way to avoid that behaviour? I'm pretty sure I > don't have any steps that are that long, but it seems that if I do these steps > will now "break". You are correct, steps longer than a page will be broken in the PDF. This is a limitation of FOP where you can't have keep together set and do page breaks. This behaviour is unavoidable until FOP is fixed :( > Point #2 indicates that a procedure cannot be longer than a page. I thought we > were talking about steps, not procedures. It wouldn't take very much to have a > procedure go longer than one page, especially with a screenshot in the middle > of it. You are correct, #2 should read: If a step is longer than a page the texts and images of that step will run off the end of the page and are no longer viewable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 14:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:53:26 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 489626] Publican no longer allows for numbers in book titles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903261453.n2QErQ4x010830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489626 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-26 10:53:01 EDT --- publican-fedora-0.18-0.fc10, publican-0.44-0.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 14:53:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:53:48 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 486501] html output does not display correctly in IE7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903261453.n2QErmFQ020652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486501 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-26 10:53:22 EDT --- publican-fedora-0.18-0.fc10, publican-0.44-0.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 14:53:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:53:32 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 484628] Many warnings 'body-start() called from outside an fo:list-item' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903261453.n2QErWV0020547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484628 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-26 10:53:07 EDT --- publican-fedora-0.18-0.fc10, publican-0.44-0.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 14:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:53:36 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 485179] new Book_Info.po files have incorrect "Project-Id-Version", causing non en-US builds to fail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903261453.n2QErag2020579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485179 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-26 10:53:11 EDT --- publican-fedora-0.18-0.fc10, publican-0.44-0.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 22:09:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:09:59 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 479794] image quality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903262209.n2QM9x36019402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479794 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |mhideo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 22:10:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:10:02 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 486050] Publican Website In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903262210.n2QMA20c019778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486050 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |mhideo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 22:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:10:00 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 482784] RFE: Support refentry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903262210.n2QMA0HU019422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482784 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |mhideo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 22:10:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:10:03 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 491241] Regression of publican bug #474077 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903262210.n2QMA3ZA019795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491241 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |mhideo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 22:10:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:10:06 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492034] "files" directory not included in rpms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903262210.n2QMA6to019871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492034 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |mhideo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 22:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:10:05 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 491782] .xml and images in sub-directories break images in PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903262210.n2QMA5Fq019849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491782 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |mhideo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 01:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:31:57 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 491241] Regression of publican bug #474077 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903270131.n2R1VvTt023782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491241 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jfearn at redhat.com Fixed In Version| |0.45 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2009-03-26 21:31:31 EDT --- sigh this was in place for html but not pdf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 02:00:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:00:54 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492034] "files" directory not included in rpms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903270200.n2R20saE025131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492034 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jfearn at redhat.com Fixed In Version| |0.45 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2009-03-26 22:00:29 EDT --- modified TARDIR_Template to gather files directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 22:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:49:06 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492964] New: New JBoss Logo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New JBoss Logo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492964 Summary: New JBoss Logo Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: jwulf at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- The JBoss logo has been updated and we need to put the new one into the publican JBoss brand. I've attached a jpg of the new one. I'll try to get a png. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 31 02:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:26:09 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492984] New: procedure steps are pulled onto next page and leave white space Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: procedure steps are pulled onto next page and leave white space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492984 Summary: procedure steps are pulled onto next page and leave white space Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: dmison at redhat.com QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: Procedure steps that span a "pdf page break" no longer flow from one page to another but instead are pulled down to the start of the next page. This leaves an area of white space. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.45 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a procedure so one of the steps would span a pdf page break. The procedure or step doesn't have to be over a page in length, it could occur towards the bottom of a page 2. Build the pdf Actual results: The step is pulled down onto the next page leaving a chunk of white space on the previous page. Expected results: The text of the step flows from the first page to the next (as it did in 0.44 and earlier) Additional info: Caused by the "fix" for bugzilla 492021 I think the reported problem from 492021 is a *content problem*, not a publican problem. You can't split an image over a page so any series of half page images interspaced with a few lines of text will be a problem. If we could control this behaviour via an attribute in the step (or procedure) tag that would be useful. Would also be useful in other tags too I guess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.