From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 00:19:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:19:30 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 554261] Publican not generating correct POTs from English XML files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010019.o210JUeD003712@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554261 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 00:19:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:19:32 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 542524] http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com doesn't function as expected under IE7/IE8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010019.o210JWX2003722@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542524 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 00:19:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:19:31 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 563056] Wrong segmentation from XML to POT when a footnote is present. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010019.o210JVl7003717@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563056 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 00:19:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:19:29 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 559823] Article_Info.xml / Book_Info.xml: tags in abstract eat a space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010019.o210JTfj013573@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559823 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 00:19:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:19:31 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010019.o210JV1T013583@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 00:19:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:19:31 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 563397] Publican is taking deprecated entries from the PO file when building In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010019.o210JVAg013582@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563397 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 00:19:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:19:33 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 556201] Article_Info.xml created with no line breaks on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010019.o210JXSb013587@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556201 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 00:30:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:30:21 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 492499] Add a section on how to reach Support / GSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010030.o210ULhS005517@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492499 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 01:13:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:13:36 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 569249] New: "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569249 Summary: "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: mhideo at redhat.com ReportedBy: rlerch at redhat.com QAContact: jwulf at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- I attempted to build a desktop package locally with publican 1.5 using the following command: "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" and it failed, returning the following error message: Can't locate object method "xml_lang" via package < packagename > (perhaps you forgot to load "< packagename >"?) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Publican/Builder.pm line 1477, line 14. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 01:14:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:14:24 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 569249] "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010114.o211EOls011936@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569249 Ryan Lerch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mhideo at redhat.com |jfearn at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 01:35:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:35:16 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 569249] "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010135.o211ZG5P026467@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569249 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_DEV Fixed In Version| |1.5-1 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2010-02-28 20:35:11 EST --- There was some extra text on line 1477 that the syntax parser did not pick up as being invalid. Deleted text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 03:06:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:06:07 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 569249] "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010306.o21367I1028945@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569249 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5-1 |1.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 04:14:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:14:01 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 569249] "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010414.o214E1YM007447@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569249 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-28 23:13:59 EST --- publican-1.6-0.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 04:14:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:14:11 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 569249] "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010414.o214EBPv007474@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569249 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-28 23:14:09 EST --- publican-1.6-0.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6-0.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 1 04:14:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:14:22 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 569249] "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003010414.o214EMlg021837@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569249 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-28 23:14:18 EST --- publican-1.6-0.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6-0.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 2 01:03:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 20:03:47 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 569249] "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003020103.o2213l5m030813@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569249 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-01 20:03:45 EST --- publican-1.6-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 2 01:04:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 20:04:42 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 569249] "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003020104.o2214gPD031274@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569249 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-01 20:04:39 EST --- publican-1.6-0.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 2 01:06:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 20:06:21 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 569249] "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003020106.o2216L1n031876@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569249 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-01 20:06:20 EST --- publican-1.6-0.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 2 01:10:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 20:10:36 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 569249] "publican package --desktop --lang=en-US" fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003020110.o221AaEE001367@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569249 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 5 04:06:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 23:06:49 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003050406.o2546nFR006966@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 --- Comment #10 from Manuel Ospina 2010-03-04 23:06:46 EST --- There are still some entries that are not replaced: #. Tag: para #, no-c-format msgid "" "Valgrind has been updated to version 3.5.0, providing enhanced support for a " "wide range of system architectures. This update introduces many improvements " "to performance, scalability and usability of the Valgrind. Notably, the " "usability and scalability of the Helgrind tool ? which is used to detect " "race contiditions ? has been improved. The leak checking capabilities of the " "Memcheck tool are also improved. Additionally, support " "for DWARF debugging information has been enhanced." msgstr "Valgrind ha sido actualizada a la versi?n 3.5.0, proporcionando soporte mejorado para un amplio rango de arquitecturas de sistema. Esta actualizaci?n introduce muchas mejoras en rendimiento, escalabilidad y utilidad de Valgrind. En particular, la utilidad y escalabilidad de la herramienta Helgrind ? la cual sirve para detectar condiciones de carrera ? ha sido mejorada. Tambi?n han sido mejorados la filtraci?n de verificaci?n de funcionalidades de la herramienta Memcheck y el soporte para informaci?n de depuraci?n DWARF." XML: Valgrind has been updated to version 3.5.0, providing enhanced support for a wide range of system architectures. This update introduces many improvements to performance, scalability and usability of the Valgrind. Notably, the usability and scalability of the Helgrind tool ? which is used to detect race contiditions ? has been improved. The leak checking capabilities of the Memcheck tool are also improved. Additionally, support for DWARF debugging information has been enhanced. from: Release Notes rhel5.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 5 05:14:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 00:14:39 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003050514.o255Edl5021141@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Fixed In Version|1.5 | Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | --- Comment #11 from Jeff Fearn 2010-03-05 00:14:36 EST --- It's the fat dash, ?, that is doing it, not sure why. The work around is to use a normal dash or — -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Fri Mar 5 08:15:59 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:15:59 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican 2.0 branch! Message-ID: <1267776959.2827.28.camel@localhost> Hi all, I am finally getting time to open source the last remaining component of Publican (YAY,!!!111!!!) the back-end that consumes the web packages. It is quite a bit of work to extract the Red Hat specific content and make the system work without using RPM. Since there will be large changes to the code base, mainly extra content but a few changes to the core code, I have decided to branch the source to allow for a cleaner source tree ... and patching urgent bugs ;) I have branched the 1.6 tree to svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/publican/branches/publican-1.6, trunk will now be considered to be the 2 beta tree. Given the current thread on the fedora devel-list about upgrading practices we probably will not be upgrading to 2.0 on Fedora 11 or 12, so the 1.6 tree will be used for maintaining these distros, and other distros that do not want to propagate the 2.0 changes. Note that this is open for debate, but it is, AIUI, "not the proper thing to do" so please consider this before starting a debate. This does not affect the brand packages, so they will continue to use the trunk. I wish I could point you to an example of how the system looks, but the code migration isn't complete and the only active version we have is an internal staging server for the Red Hat Engineering Content Services team. This system has over 600 packages installed on it, with a lot of updates applied every week, so it has been a good test bed. I hope to be able to change my fedora people site over to this system in the next week, the non RPM version of course, so keep an eye on http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org if you are interested. I will post an update when I get that changed over. I'm pretty happy to be able to get to this, it has been bugging me for ages but I keep getting assigned to fight hotter fires. I will be migrating the system as it currently works, with changes for not using RPM or hard coded front pages. After that, when people can get a clearer picture of what it is and how it works, we will be open to discussions on how to improve it or make it more flexible. It's just a bit hard to have that discussion before you can see what it does :) Well it's Friday night here, so I must consume some cider :D Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From jwulf at redhat.com Fri Mar 5 22:21:10 2010 From: jwulf at redhat.com (Joshua Wulf) Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:21:10 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican 2.0 branch! In-Reply-To: <1267776959.2827.28.camel@localhost> References: <1267776959.2827.28.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <4B9183D6.9080703@redhat.com> Rocktastic! :-) On 5/03/10 6:15 PM, Jeff Fearn wrote: > Hi all, I am finally getting time to open source the last remaining > component of Publican (YAY,!!!111!!!) the back-end that consumes the web > packages. > > It is quite a bit of work to extract the Red Hat specific content and > make the system work without using RPM. Since there will be large > changes to the code base, mainly extra content but a few changes to the > core code, I have decided to branch the source to allow for a cleaner > source tree ... and patching urgent bugs ;) > > I have branched the 1.6 tree to > svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/publican/branches/publican-1.6, trunk will now > be considered to be the 2 beta tree. > > Given the current thread on the fedora devel-list about upgrading > practices we probably will not be upgrading to 2.0 on Fedora 11 or 12, > so the 1.6 tree will be used for maintaining these distros, and other > distros that do not want to propagate the 2.0 changes. Note that this is > open for debate, but it is, AIUI, "not the proper thing to do" so please > consider this before starting a debate. > > This does not affect the brand packages, so they will continue to use > the trunk. > > I wish I could point you to an example of how the system looks, but the > code migration isn't complete and the only active version we have is an > internal staging server for the Red Hat Engineering Content Services > team. This system has over 600 packages installed on it, with a lot of > updates applied every week, so it has been a good test bed. > > I hope to be able to change my fedora people site over to this system in > the next week, the non RPM version of course, so keep an eye on > http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org if you are interested. I will post an > update when I get that changed over. > > I'm pretty happy to be able to get to this, it has been bugging me for > ages but I keep getting assigned to fight hotter fires. > > I will be migrating the system as it currently works, with changes for > not using RPM or hard coded front pages. After that, when people can get > a clearer picture of what it is and how it works, we will be open to > discussions on how to improve it or make it more flexible. It's just a > bit hard to have that discussion before you can see what it does :) > > Well it's Friday night here, so I must consume some cider :D > > Cheers, Jeff. > > From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 6 03:41:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 22:41:50 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003060341.o263fo32005449@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |570979 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Sun Mar 7 07:00:02 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:00:02 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican 2.0 branch! In-Reply-To: <1267776959.2827.28.camel@localhost> References: <1267776959.2827.28.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <1267945202.2478.4.camel@localhost> FYI I have checked the Publican::Website content in to trunk and have updated http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org with a sample, including a tutorial on how to create a site using the command line tools. You will of course have to build the source to test them though :) Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 7 09:55:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 04:55:39 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003070955.o279tdNd012695@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 Bug 568201 depends on bug 570979, which changed state. Bug 570979 Summary: UTF8 PO files not being read as UTF8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570979 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rlerch at redhat.com Mon Mar 8 05:48:13 2010 From: rlerch at redhat.com (Ryan Lerch) Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:48:13 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Testing "publican create_site" In-Reply-To: <1267776959.2827.28.camel@localhost> References: <1267776959.2827.28.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <1268027293.6383.147.camel@graphics.bne.redhat.com> Hi all, I checked out an built the latest publican SVN version, to test the new WebSite functionality, but i am hitting an issue. following the directions on: http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/en-US/index.html i ran these commands: """ cd ~/sources mkdir fedorapeople cd fedorapeople publican create_site --site_config homepage.cfg --db_file fedorapeople.db --toc_path public_html """ and publican responded with the following error message: """ unknown args: configfile at /usr/bin/publican line 456 """ This publican command only created "page.cfg" and the "public_html" directory, am i doing something wrong? cheers, ryanlerch From jfearn at redhat.com Tue Mar 9 00:14:18 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:14:18 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Testing "publican create_site" In-Reply-To: <1268027293.6383.147.camel@graphics.bne.redhat.com> References: <1267776959.2827.28.camel@localhost> <1268027293.6383.147.camel@graphics.bne.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1268093658.2892.4.camel@localhost> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 15:48 +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote: > Hi all, > > I checked out an built the latest publican SVN version, to test the new > WebSite functionality, but i am hitting an issue. > > following the directions on: > http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/en-US/index.html > > i ran these commands: > """ > cd ~/sources > mkdir fedorapeople > cd fedorapeople > publican create_site --site_config homepage.cfg --db_file fedorapeople.db --toc_path public_html > """ > > and publican responded with the following error message: > """ > unknown args: configfile at /usr/bin/publican line 456 > """ > > This publican command only created "page.cfg" and the "public_html" directory, > > am i doing something wrong? FYI Ryan had a some of the pre-release code manually installed on his system that had to be cleaned up. I it's extremely unlikely this would happen for anyone else :) Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 9 04:22:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 23:22:37 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 571633] New: Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571633 Summary: Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: mhideo at redhat.com ReportedBy: mospina at redhat.com QAContact: jwulf at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POT files. When building the localized versions, the content of the screen tag looks different. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.6 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. publican update_pot 2. 3. Actual results: Therefore, to install all packages but " "conflicting packages, the kickstart file must contain: %packages " "@Everything - at Conflicts " Expected results: Therefore, to install all packages but conflicting packages, the kickstart file must contain: %packages @Everything - at Conflicts Additional info: English XML: Previously, the kickstart installation method offered two options to select all packages @Everything and * (wildcard). As of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5, both of these options have been deprecated. Attempting to use a select all packages option will fail, unless the kickstart file also includes package negation for conflicting packages. Therefore, to install all packages but conflicting packages, the kickstart file must contain: %packages @Everything - at Conflicts PO file: msgid "" "Previously, the kickstart installation method offered two options to select " "all packages @Everything and * " "(wildcard). As of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5, both of these options have " "been deprecated. Attempting to use a select all " "packages option will fail, unless the kickstart file also includes package " "negation for conflicting packages. Therefore, to install all packages but " "conflicting packages, the kickstart file must contain: %packages " "@Everything - at Conflicts " Localized XML (Spanish): Anteriormente, el m?todo de instalaci?n kickstart ofrec?a dos opciones para seleccionar todos los paquetes: @ Everything y * (comod?n). A partir de Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5, estas dos opciones han sido descontinuadas. Tratar de usar una opci?n de seleccionar todos los paquetes fallar?, a no ser que el archivo de kickstart tambi?n incluya negaci?n de paquete para paquetes en conflicto Por lo tanto, para instalar todos los paquetes sin los paquetes en conflicto, el archivo de kickstart debe contener: %packages @Everything - at Conflicts . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 9 05:10:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 00:10:20 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 571633] Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003090510.o295AKYd008028@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571633 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfearn at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2010-03-09 00:10:14 EST --- I think the correct fix for this is to ban the para tag, mixed mode content is clearly a violation of both sane semantic mark-up and nature. Mixed mode content that embeds untranslatable content in translatable content is the worse kind of unnatural act. I must ponder this ... perversion ... more ... pity me this study >_< -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 9 23:54:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:54:06 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 571633] Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003092354.o29Ns6WB031678@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571633 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_DEV Fixed In Version| |2.0 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2010-03-09 18:54:02 EST --- Added code to abort POT creation when verbatim tags are detected in translatable content. e.g. Processing file en-US/Building_a_Book.xml ERROR: Verbatim content can not be embedded in translatable content, found a screen in a para! at /usr/bin/publican line 561 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 10 01:29:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:29:37 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 572015] New: make use of tag within <abstract> explicit Message-ID: <bug-572015-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: make use of <title> tag within <abstract> explicit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572015 Summary: make use of <title> tag within <abstract> explicit Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: mhideo at redhat.com ReportedBy: dmison at redhat.com QAContact: jwulf at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: I want to be able to use the <abstract> tag without the implicit title of "Abstract" appearing at the top. Can we make use of the <title> child tag of <abstract> for the title, and have no title if none is supplied ? Many books have content at the start of each chapter (and some sections) like "Read this chapter for instructions on how to do X". I would like to be able to mark that up as an abstract so that it is visually distinct for the reader. I think <abstract> is the appropriate tag for this usecase. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.6 Steps to Reproduce: 1. in book_info.xml <abstract> <title>Abstract This book is about the product X 2. in installation.xml Installation Read this chapter to learn how to install the product .... Actual results: *Abstract* This book is about the product X *Chapter 1. Installation* Abstract Read this chapter to learn how to install the product Expected results: *Abstract* This book is about the product X *Chapter 1. Installation* Read this chapter to learn how to install the product Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 10 01:58:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:58:01 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 572015] make use of tag within <abstract> explicit In-Reply-To: <bug-572015-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-572015-264938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <201003100158.o2A1w15p021504@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572015 Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jfearn at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> 2010-03-09 20:57:59 EST --- Please open discussions about this kind of thing on the list and get a consensus before opening tickets about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From dmison at redhat.com Wed Mar 10 02:20:11 2010 From: dmison at redhat.com (Darrin Mison) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:20:11 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] <abstract> within chapters (and sections) Message-ID: <AF798382-80E7-4930-9CAB-C9FB0C5F5731@redhat.com> Many books have content at the start of chapters (and some sections) like "Read this chapter for instructions on how to do X". I would like to be able to mark that up so that it is visually distinct for the reader. I think <abstract> is the appropriate tag for this use-case but it is formatted in publican as standard text and it always provides the title of Abstract at the top. <abstract> can include the child tag of <title> but it is currently ignored. Any issues with having <abstract> <para> formatted as in a slightly more distinct fashion (slightly bigger or perhaps different font or bold?) and making the use of <title> within abstract explicit (if you don't supply it then it has no title) ? Or is there another tag that fits the bill ? This would also mean that <title>Abstract would have to be inserted into the abstract in the book templates & people would have to update that on their existing books. -- Darrin Mison - Engineering Content Services -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jfearn at redhat.com Wed Mar 10 02:43:04 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:43:04 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] within chapters (and sections) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B970738.6010606@redhat.com> Darrin Mison wrote: > Many books have content at the start of chapters (and some sections) > like "Read this chapter for instructions on how to do X". I would like > to be able to mark that up so that it is visually distinct for the reader. > > I think is the appropriate tag for this use-case but it is > formatted in publican as standard text and it always provides the title > of *Abstract* at the top. This is DocBook XSL behavior, not publican specific. > can include the child tag > of but it is currently ignored. > > Any issues with having <abstract> <para> formatted as in a slightly more > distinct fashion (slightly bigger or perhaps different font or bold?) > and making the use of <title> within abstract explicit (if you don't > supply it then it has no title) ? > > Or is there another tag that fits the bill ? > > This would also mean that <title>Abstract would have to be > inserted into the abstract in the book templates & people would have to > update that on their existing books. All 700+ of them if you include translations. I think: 1: Your example implies a poor chapter/section name 2: Highlight seems more widely usable [1] Cheers, Jeff. [1] http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/highlights.html -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From dmison at redhat.com Wed Mar 10 03:40:10 2010 From: dmison at redhat.com (Darrin Mison) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:40:10 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] within chapters (and sections) In-Reply-To: <4B970738.6010606@redhat.com> References: <4B970738.6010606@redhat.com> Message-ID: Highlight sounds perfect, I'll check it out. On 10/03/2010, at 12:43 PM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Darrin Mison wrote: >> Many books have content at the start of chapters (and some sections) like "Read this chapter for instructions on how to do X". I would like to be able to mark that up so that it is visually distinct for the reader. I think is the appropriate tag for this use-case but it is formatted in publican as standard text and it always provides the title >> of *Abstract* at the top. > > This is DocBook XSL behavior, not publican specific. > >> can include the child tag of but it is currently ignored. >> Any issues with having <abstract> <para> formatted as in a slightly more distinct fashion (slightly bigger or perhaps different font or bold?) and making the use of <title> within abstract explicit (if you don't supply it then it has no title) ? > > >> Or is there another tag that fits the bill ? >> This would also mean that <title>Abstract would have to be inserted into the abstract in the book templates & people would have to update that on their existing books. > > All 700+ of them if you include translations. > > I think: > > 1: Your example implies a poor chapter/section name > 2: Highlight seems more widely usable [1] > > Cheers, Jeff. > > [1] http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/highlights.html > > -- > Jeff Fearn > Software Engineer > Engineering Operations > Red Hat, Inc > Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY > > _______________________________________________ > publican-list mailing list > publican-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican From dmison at redhat.com Wed Mar 10 04:02:49 2010 From: dmison at redhat.com (Darrin Mison) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:02:49 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] within chapters (and sections) In-Reply-To: <4B970738.6010606@redhat.com> References: <4B970738.6010606@redhat.com> Message-ID: <18A84B1C-5560-44E5-84FB-F0F350B0CF84@redhat.com> On 10/03/2010, at 12:43 PM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > 2: Highlight seems more widely usable [1] > > Cheers, Jeff. > > [1] http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/highlights.html > Would different text formatting for be doable ? I want to ensure that people recognize it as a distinct and complete entity from the rest of the text. From jfearn at redhat.com Wed Mar 10 04:05:43 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:05:43 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] within chapters (and sections) In-Reply-To: <18A84B1C-5560-44E5-84FB-F0F350B0CF84@redhat.com> References: <4B970738.6010606@redhat.com> <18A84B1C-5560-44E5-84FB-F0F350B0CF84@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4B971A97.40103@redhat.com> Darrin Mison wrote: > On 10/03/2010, at 12:43 PM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > >> 2: Highlight seems more widely usable [1] >> >> Cheers, Jeff. >> >> [1] http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/highlights.html >> > > Would different text formatting for be doable ? I want to ensure that people recognize it as a distinct and complete entity from the rest of the text. Just about anything is doable with a good suggestion for how and some cider! Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From r.landmann at redhat.com Wed Mar 10 06:41:47 2010 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:41:47 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] within chapters (and sections) In-Reply-To: <4B971A97.40103@redhat.com> References: <4B970738.6010606@redhat.com> <18A84B1C-5560-44E5-84FB-F0F350B0CF84@redhat.com> <4B971A97.40103@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4B973F2B.3020201@redhat.com> On 03/10/2010 02:05 PM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Darrin Mison wrote: >> On 10/03/2010, at 12:43 PM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: >>> 2: Highlight seems more widely usable [1] >>> >>> Cheers, Jeff. >>> >>> [1] http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/highlights.html >>> >> Would different text formatting for be doable ? I want >> to ensure that people recognize it as a distinct and complete entity >> from the rest of the text. > Just about anything is doable with a good suggestion for how and some > cider! > definitely seems better for what Darrin's describing. As for markup, I'd suggest indenting on both sides and maybe a border around it, or a light-coloured background, or both. (example of "both" attached) Cheers Rudi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jfearn at redhat.com Wed Mar 10 21:34:02 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:34:02 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] within chapters (and sections) In-Reply-To: <4B973F2B.3020201@redhat.com> References: <4B970738.6010606@redhat.com> <18A84B1C-5560-44E5-84FB-F0F350B0CF84@redhat.com> <4B971A97.40103@redhat.com> <4B973F2B.3020201@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4B98104A.3040808@redhat.com> Ruediger Landmann wrote: > On 03/10/2010 02:05 PM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: >> Darrin Mison wrote: >>> On 10/03/2010, at 12:43 PM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: >>>> 2: Highlight seems more widely usable [1] >>>> >>>> Cheers, Jeff. >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/highlights.html >>>> >>> Would different text formatting for be doable ? I want >>> to ensure that people recognize it as a distinct and complete entity >>> from the rest of the text. >> Just about anything is doable with a good suggestion for how and some >> cider! >> > > definitely seems better for what Darrin's describing. > > As for markup, I'd suggest indenting on both sides and maybe a border > around it, or a light-coloured background, or both. (example of "both" > attached) You will note your example is an excellent example of my point about poorly titled chapters/sections ... is this deliberate? I looked at a few of the books I have here, and the few that have this kind of introductory text, none of the better ones do, none mark it up differently that the rest of the body text. Wish we had and experienced editor to chime in here. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From r.landmann at redhat.com Wed Mar 10 23:23:47 2010 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:23:47 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] within chapters (and sections) In-Reply-To: <4B98104A.3040808@redhat.com> References: <4B970738.6010606@redhat.com> <18A84B1C-5560-44E5-84FB-F0F350B0CF84@redhat.com> <4B971A97.40103@redhat.com> <4B973F2B.3020201@redhat.com> <4B98104A.3040808@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4B982A03.4040301@redhat.com> On 03/11/2010 07:34 AM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Ruediger Landmann wrote: >> >> As for markup, I'd suggest indenting on both sides and maybe a border >> around it, or a light-coloured background, or both. (example of >> "both" attached) > > You will note your example is an excellent example of my point about > poorly titled chapters/sections ... is this deliberate? Yeah, all content deliberately nonsensical. > I looked at a few of the books I have here, and the few that have this > kind of introductory text, none of the better ones do, none mark it up > differently that the rest of the body text. OK -- further research is indicated :) > > Wish we had and experienced editor to chime in here. +1 From r.landmann at redhat.com Wed Mar 10 23:46:52 2010 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:46:52 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] within chapters (and sections) In-Reply-To: <4B98104A.3040808@redhat.com> References: <4B970738.6010606@redhat.com> <18A84B1C-5560-44E5-84FB-F0F350B0CF84@redhat.com> <4B971A97.40103@redhat.com> <4B973F2B.3020201@redhat.com> <4B98104A.3040808@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4B982F6C.1050801@redhat.com> On 03/11/2010 07:34 AM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > I looked at a few of the books I have here, and the few that have this > kind of introductory text, none of the better ones do, none mark it up > differently that the rest of the body text. FWIW, this is what the "For Dummies" folks do with theirs: http://tinyurl.com/ybjo6nf From jfearn at redhat.com Thu Mar 11 00:05:29 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:05:29 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] within chapters (and sections) In-Reply-To: <4B982F6C.1050801@redhat.com> References: <4B970738.6010606@redhat.com> <18A84B1C-5560-44E5-84FB-F0F350B0CF84@redhat.com> <4B971A97.40103@redhat.com> <4B973F2B.3020201@redhat.com> <4B98104A.3040808@redhat.com> <4B982F6C.1050801@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4B9833C9.6040007@redhat.com> Ruediger Landmann wrote: > On 03/11/2010 07:34 AM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: >> I looked at a few of the books I have here, and the few that have this >> kind of introductory text, none of the better ones do, none mark it up >> differently that the rest of the body text. > > FWIW, this is what the "For Dummies" folks do with theirs: So, terribly chapter name, ugly style, let's aim higher than dummies! :D Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From jfearn at redhat.com Wed Mar 17 00:31:09 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:31:09 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican in Transifex! Message-ID: <1268785869.2464.14.camel@localhost> For those of you who missed the announcement on other lists some of the Publican content is now being translated in Transifex! https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/p/publican/ Hopefully soon the Users Guide and software strings will be in there as well. I get a little thrill whenever I see a transifex commit to our SVN repo :P Hey Rudi, maybe we need something in the users guide about how to contribute translations for Publican ... buddy, mate, pal, friend ;) Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From r.landmann at redhat.com Wed Mar 17 00:33:56 2010 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:33:56 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican in Transifex! In-Reply-To: <1268785869.2464.14.camel@localhost> References: <1268785869.2464.14.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <4BA02374.9030906@redhat.com> On 03/17/2010 10:31 AM, Jeff Fearn wrote: > For those of you who missed the announcement on other lists some of the > Publican content is now being translated in Transifex! > > https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/p/publican/ > > Hopefully soon the Users Guide and software strings will be in there as > well. > > I get a little thrill whenever I see a transifex commit to our SVN > repo :P > > Hey Rudi, maybe we need something in the users guide about how to > contribute translations for Publican ... buddy, mate, pal, friend ;) > I'll get onto it :) Apart from docs, is there anything else standing in the way of releasing 2.0, or am I blocking that too? :) Cheers Rudi From jfearn at redhat.com Wed Mar 17 00:41:39 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:41:39 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican in Transifex! In-Reply-To: <4BA02374.9030906@redhat.com> References: <1268785869.2464.14.camel@localhost> <4BA02374.9030906@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1268786499.2464.15.camel@localhost> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:33 +1000, Ruediger Landmann wrote: > On 03/17/2010 10:31 AM, Jeff Fearn wrote: > > For those of you who missed the announcement on other lists some of the > > Publican content is now being translated in Transifex! > > > > https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/p/publican/ > > > > Hopefully soon the Users Guide and software strings will be in there as > > well. > > > > I get a little thrill whenever I see a transifex commit to our SVN > > repo :P > > > > Hey Rudi, maybe we need something in the users guide about how to > > contribute translations for Publican ... buddy, mate, pal, friend ;) > > > > I'll get onto it :) > > Apart from docs, is there anything else standing in the way of releasing > 2.0, or am I blocking that too? :) More testing, input from anyone not me who is interested in using the web site stuff :) Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From jonathan.robie at redhat.com Wed Mar 17 18:19:50 2010 From: jonathan.robie at redhat.com (Jonathan Robie) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:19:50 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] Turning off validation (sssshhhhh!!!!!!) In-Reply-To: <4BA02374.9030906@redhat.com> References: <1268785869.2464.14.camel@localhost> <4BA02374.9030906@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BA11D46.8000009@redhat.com> I'm working on a large documentation set that currently has plenty of dangling links (it was produced by automatic conversion from a Wiki). I would like to be able to turn off validation, but still build a document. I can do this with a vanilla DocBook tool chain, but I'd like to use Publican instead for a variety of reasons. Once we get the entire project to validate, I'd turn it on and keep it on. Is this possible? Jonathan From dmison at redhat.com Wed Mar 17 23:36:14 2010 From: dmison at redhat.com (Darrin Mison) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:36:14 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Turning off validation (sssshhhhh!!!!!!) In-Reply-To: <4BA11D46.8000009@redhat.com> References: <1268785869.2464.14.camel@localhost> <4BA02374.9030906@redhat.com> <4BA11D46.8000009@redhat.com> Message-ID: On 18/03/2010, at 4:19 AM, Jonathan Robie wrote: > I'm working on a large documentation set that currently has plenty of dangling links (it was produced by automatic conversion from a Wiki). > > I would like to be able to turn off validation, but still build a document. I can do this with a vanilla DocBook tool chain, but I'd like to use Publican instead for a variety of reasons. Once we get the entire project to validate, I'd turn it on and keep it on. > > Is this possible? > > Jonathan > +1 for this for too When trying to isolate issues I often comment out everything from the book expect the chapter/section where I think the problem lies. When the content in question has lots of s to the rest of the book this quickly turns into a nightmare. -- Darrin Mison - Engineering Content Services From dmison at redhat.com Thu Mar 18 01:37:22 2010 From: dmison at redhat.com (Darrin Mison) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:37:22 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Redundant common content files when publishing books Message-ID: <057BE9F4-2978-4462-AF05-54E574268E35@redhat.com> When publishing a number of books using the same brand each book ends up with their own set of common content files. This is problematic for a couple of reasons: 1 - many uploading/publishing systems are often problematic when dealing with large numbers of files 2 - increased webserver traffic as the common content is not shared & therefore not cached optimally Perhaps merging common content on a brand basis could be an option when building books using the upcoming website generation feature ? Or be able to specify the required path(absolute or relative) for pre-published common content as a publican configuration when building the book ? eg. docs `-- en-US `-- MyProduct |-- Common_Content | `-- JBoss | |-- css | `-- images |-- Config_Guide `-- Install_Guide Thoughts ? -- Darrin Mison - Engineering Content Services From jeremy at cowgar.com Thu Mar 18 23:00:31 2010 From: jeremy at cowgar.com (Jeremy Cowgar) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:00:31 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] Win32 Installer Woes Message-ID: <4BA2B08E.4030603@cowgar.com> Hello, Publican was recommended to me in the #docbook IRC channel today, so I gave it a try. I was having Internet connectivity issues this morning and during the installation, when it went to download the DTD.zip file, the installer reported that the connection timed out the quit. I simply waiting until later in the day once my connectivity issues were fixed. When I went to run the installer again, it said it was installed already and that it would have to be removed. That worked fine. The installation this time around went fine. Now, I began using it and all worked fine. I then went to generate a PDF file using publican and got an error that "cmd.exe" couldn't be launched, so the PDF creation failed. I wasn't quite sure what that problem could have been, so I went on to other things. As I was working in the console I realized that a lot of my programs were not working, SVN, Fossil, Gcc, all MinGW utilities, Ant, etc... All of them were command not found! So, I went to check my path. Low an behold, the *only* thing in my path was a few directories under the new publican installation! I began fixing my path (can't remember everything that was in it, but it probably needed purged anyway, so no big deal). Anyway, once I fixed my path and added quite a few directories back into it (including C:\Windows\System32) publican could then execute cmd.exe just fine and all is working fine. But... that install bug is a doosy! Your path is not something you "backup" frequently. I could see how that could be extremely frustrating for some who install publican. I was asked on #docbook to report this problem to the mailing list, so there it is. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but, hey... It sure was nice having everything installed for docbook with one installer! Thanks! Jeremy Cowgar From jeremy at cowgar.com Thu Mar 18 23:34:49 2010 From: jeremy at cowgar.com (Jeremy Cowgar) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:34:49 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] sect3 weirdness with page breaks? Message-ID: <4BA2B899.3020709@cowgar.com> I am brand new to creating docbook files, however, I believe I have done things correctly. I have: Stack Words ... ... ... On the first sect2, all sect3's appear on the same page. When I get to the bottom of the sect3 list (about 20) under the first sect2, then it wants me to go to a new page (normal). However, once it goes to a new page, each and every sect3 of the next set is on it's own page. You can see this at: http://www.josl.org/manual/en-US/html/stack-words.html The file that is responsible for that HTML is: http://www.josl.org/manual/Chapter_Stack.xml Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug in publican? Jeremy Cowgar From dmison at redhat.com Thu Mar 18 23:54:37 2010 From: dmison at redhat.com (Darrin Mison) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:54:37 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] sect3 weirdness with page breaks? In-Reply-To: <4BA2B899.3020709@cowgar.com> References: <4BA2B899.3020709@cowgar.com> Message-ID: <58C35874-0F05-410E-88B1-DF2BBA03B07C@redhat.com> I'm not sure if there are any issues with , etc but try using
instead. It's much more flexible. On 19/03/2010, at 9:34 AM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote: > I am brand new to creating docbook files, however, I believe I have done things correctly. I have: > > > Stack Words > > ... > > ... > > ... > > On the first sect2, all sect3's appear on the same page. When I get to the bottom of the sect3 list (about 20) under the first sect2, then it wants me to go to a new page (normal). However, once it goes to a new page, each and every sect3 of the next set is on it's own page. > > You can see this at: > > http://www.josl.org/manual/en-US/html/stack-words.html > > The file that is responsible for that HTML is: > > http://www.josl.org/manual/Chapter_Stack.xml > > Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug in publican? > > Jeremy Cowgar > > _______________________________________________ > publican-list mailing list > publican-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican From misty at redhat.com Fri Mar 19 00:09:36 2010 From: misty at redhat.com (Misty Stanley-Jones) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:09:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] sect3 weirdness with page breaks? In-Reply-To: <4BA2B899.3020709@cowgar.com> Message-ID: <10883068.58.1268957429178.JavaMail.mstanley@mstanley> Hi Jeremy, It is much better in the long term to simply use
exclusively. Infinite
tags can be nested, and this makes your document more modular and easier to arrange in the future. It may give you output closer to what you expect, as well. I realize that this doesn't answer your question, and I can't speak to whether this is a bug or not (perhaps someone else can), because I don't use the tags myself. Thanks, Misty ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Cowgar" To: publican-list at redhat.com Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:34:49 AM Subject: [publican-list] sect3 weirdness with page breaks? I am brand new to creating docbook files, however, I believe I have done things correctly. I have: Stack Words ... ... ... On the first sect2, all sect3's appear on the same page. When I get to the bottom of the sect3 list (about 20) under the first sect2, then it wants me to go to a new page (normal). However, once it goes to a new page, each and every sect3 of the next set is on it's own page. You can see this at: http://www.josl.org/manual/en-US/html/stack-words.html The file that is responsible for that HTML is: http://www.josl.org/manual/Chapter_Stack.xml Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug in publican? Jeremy Cowgar _______________________________________________ publican-list mailing list publican-list at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican From jmorgan at redhat.com Fri Mar 19 00:11:51 2010 From: jmorgan at redhat.com (Jared Morgan) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:11:51 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] sect3 weirdness with page breaks? In-Reply-To: <17709568.34.1268957538062.JavaMail.jmorgan@dhcp-1-169.bne.redhat.com> Message-ID: <12842832.37.1268957594607.JavaMail.jmorgan@dhcp-1-169.bne.redhat.com> Hi Jeremy Thanks for taking the time to write to the list. tags are valid XML, and Publican permits these elements. What Publican doesn't do at the moment is render the elements correctly. Very few writers use the elements, because they have hierarchical constraints. For sections in your document, I strongly recommend using the
element.
elements are not hierarchical, so if you ever need to reorder sections in your books, you will find it quite easy. You may want to refer to PressGang's JBoss Documentation Guide [1], which will give you some welcome assistance concerning DocBook authoring. The guide contains a chapter containing very useful XML element usage guidelines. The DocBook official site [2] is the canonical source for DocBook element usage, however it isn't very user-friendly. I hope this information helps you, Jeremy. Kind regards Jared Morgan Content Author Red Hat Asia Pacific 1/193 North Quay BRISBANE QLD 4000 P: +61 7 3514 8242 M: +61 413 005 479 [1] http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/JBoss_Documentation_Guide/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/JBoss_Documentation_Guide/target/docbook/publish/en-US/html_single/index.html [2] http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Cowgar" To: publican-list at redhat.com Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:34:49 AM Subject: [publican-list] sect3 weirdness with page breaks? I am brand new to creating docbook files, however, I believe I have done things correctly. I have: Stack Words ... ... ... On the first sect2, all sect3's appear on the same page. When I get to the bottom of the sect3 list (about 20) under the first sect2, then it wants me to go to a new page (normal). However, once it goes to a new page, each and every sect3 of the next set is on it's own page. You can see this at: http://www.josl.org/manual/en-US/html/stack-words.html The file that is responsible for that HTML is: http://www.josl.org/manual/Chapter_Stack.xml Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug in publican? Jeremy Cowgar _______________________________________________ publican-list mailing list publican-list at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From r.landmann at redhat.com Fri Mar 19 01:01:38 2010 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:01:38 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] sect3 weirdness with page breaks? In-Reply-To: <4BA2B899.3020709@cowgar.com> References: <4BA2B899.3020709@cowgar.com> Message-ID: <4BA2CCF2.3040204@redhat.com> On 03/19/2010 09:34 AM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote: > > On the first sect2, all sect3's appear on the same page. When I get to > the bottom of the sect3 list (about 20) under the first sect2, then it > wants me to go to a new page (normal). However, once it goes to a new > page, each and every sect3 of the next set is on it's own page. > To keep these subsections together, you might need to set chunk_section_depth: 1 in the book's publican_cfg file You might also need to run "publican clean" before rebuilding. This is my output: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/test/ Cheers Rudi From stickster at gmail.com Fri Mar 19 02:26:16 2010 From: stickster at gmail.com (Paul W. Frields) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:26:16 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] Thanks Message-ID: <20100319022616.GI29385@victoria.internal.frields.org> I've been using Publican a little more often while helping out with some Docs work, and I felt compelled to write about how FAST it is nowadays. It's so much easier to get work done with a more efficient tool. Thanks for all the work that went into getting us to this point. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 19 06:02:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:02:41 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 563056] Wrong segmentation from XML to POT when a footnote is present. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003190602.o2J62fVV022828@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563056 Runa Bhattacharjee changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |runab at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jeremy at cowgar.com Fri Mar 19 09:40:59 2010 From: jeremy at cowgar.com (Jeremy Cowgar) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:40:59 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] sect3 weirdness with page breaks? In-Reply-To: <4BA2CCF2.3040204@redhat.com> References: <4BA2B899.3020709@cowgar.com> <4BA2CCF2.3040204@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BA346AB.1040803@cowgar.com> On 3/18/2010 9:01 PM, Ruediger Landmann wrote: > > To keep these subsections together, you might need to set > > chunk_section_depth: 1 > > in the book's publican_cfg file > > You might also need to run "publican clean" before rebuilding. This is > my output: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/test/ Ok, This caused publican to behave as expected. I wonder if this should be default? The way it was behaving before was very awkward and contrary to most websites that I have seen. Contrary to how other xslt processor function as well. Jeremy From dhensley at redhat.com Fri Mar 19 15:04:17 2010 From: dhensley at redhat.com (Douglas Silas) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:04:17 +0100 Subject: [publican-list] sect3 weirdness with page breaks? In-Reply-To: <4BA2B899.3020709@cowgar.com> References: <4BA2B899.3020709@cowgar.com> Message-ID: <4BA39271.6000702@redhat.com> Hi Jeremy, I'm not sure from your description how you are nesting the numbered section elements, i.e. sect1-sectX, (and Chapter_Stack.xml is empty), but the best advice I can give you is: simply use the normal
elements and let Publican handle the numbering. Using the sectX elements will only lead to pain, requires manually changing the numbers when you reorder stuff, etc. FWIW, I have written many large books, and have never used a element. Cheers, Silas On 03/19/2010 12:34 AM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote: > I am brand new to creating docbook files, however, I believe I have done > things correctly. I have: > > > Stack Words > > ... > > ... > > ... > > On the first sect2, all sect3's appear on the same page. When I get to > the bottom of the sect3 list (about 20) under the first sect2, then it > wants me to go to a new page (normal). However, once it goes to a new > page, each and every sect3 of the next set is on it's own page. > > You can see this at: > > http://www.josl.org/manual/en-US/html/stack-words.html > > The file that is responsible for that HTML is: > > http://www.josl.org/manual/Chapter_Stack.xml > > Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug in publican? > > Jeremy Cowgar > > _______________________________________________ > publican-list mailing list > publican-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican From sherringham at gmail.com Sun Mar 21 08:39:34 2010 From: sherringham at gmail.com (Alastair Sherringham) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:39:34 +0000 Subject: [publican-list] Build error with Publican 1.6 from source Message-ID: <4ac25dd31003210139k48d9cd45te29466beb315c9bb@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I am looking into various documentation processes and came across Publican. I downloaded Publican 1.6 source from : https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/u/publican/Publican-1.6.tar.gz I am using Ubuntu 9.10. However, I had problems building (using README as a guide). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $ perl Build.PL Creating new 'MYMETA.yml' with configuration results Creating new 'Build' script for 'Publican' version '1.6' $ ./Build Building Publican Setting up ar-SA PO file 'ar-SA/Legal_Notice.po' not found! Using base XML! Processing file tmp/ar-SA/xml_tmp/Conventions.xml mismatched tag at line 11, column 3, byte 800 at /usr/lib/perl5/XML/Parser.pm line 187 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If I change line 72 of Build.PL from : $builder->build( { formats => 'xml', langs => 'all', publish => 1 } ); to $builder->build( { formats => 'xml', langs => 'en-US', publish => 1 } ); It builds OK. Is it required or expected to set-up for every language by default? Cheers, -- Alastair Sherringham From jfearn at redhat.com Sun Mar 21 22:30:26 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:30:26 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Redundant common content files when publishing books In-Reply-To: <057BE9F4-2978-4462-AF05-54E574268E35@redhat.com> References: <057BE9F4-2978-4462-AF05-54E574268E35@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1269210626.2506.24.camel@localhost> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 11:37 +1000, Darrin Mison wrote: > When publishing a number of books using the same brand each book ends up with their own set of common content files. > > This is problematic for a couple of reasons: > > 1 - many uploading/publishing systems are often problematic when dealing with large numbers of files > 2 - increased webserver traffic as the common content is not shared & therefore not cached optimally > > Perhaps merging common content on a brand basis could be an option when building books using the upcoming website generation feature ? > > Or be able to specify the required path(absolute or relative) for pre-published common content as a publican configuration when building the book ? > > eg. > docs > `-- en-US > `-- MyProduct > |-- Common_Content > | `-- JBoss > | |-- css > | `-- images > |-- Config_Guide > `-- Install_Guide > > > Thoughts ? You can either have one copy of the common content for everything or one per book, nothing else is really maintainable. e.g. The example above won't work on an RPM based system unless you create a brand RPM for each product or modify the brand RPM to install the content in every location it might possibly be used. If you have one copy for every book using a brand, when you update the brand you have to rebuild all the books that use it to ensure the books render properly. You can't be sure there isn't some change that affects how older content is displayed with newer styles, particularly if you change the XSL and not just the css. Of course if you are changing the css you are probably changing the PDF to match and now your HTML and PDF of the same book and version are out of sync; so rebuilding the package is the obvious choice for sanity. Since it won't affect me I'm not really fussed ... but I imagine the writers might get a bit narky if they have to rebuild hundreds of books regularly ... maybe that's OK though :P Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From jfearn at redhat.com Sun Mar 21 22:59:17 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:59:17 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Win32 Installer Woes In-Reply-To: <4BA2B08E.4030603@cowgar.com> References: <4BA2B08E.4030603@cowgar.com> Message-ID: <1269212357.2506.47.camel@localhost> Hi Jeremy, which version of Windows was this? I've tested the uninstaller on XP and Vista, and it worked OK. I added some checks to the uninstaller where it removes the paths, hopefully this will avoid nulling the path when uninstalling an incomplete install. Cheers, Jeff. On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 19:00 -0400, Jeremy Cowgar wrote: > Hello, > > Publican was recommended to me in the #docbook IRC channel today, so I > gave it a try. I was having Internet connectivity issues this morning > and during the installation, when it went to download the DTD.zip file, > the installer reported that the connection timed out the quit. I simply > waiting until later in the day once my connectivity issues were fixed. > > When I went to run the installer again, it said it was installed already > and that it would have to be removed. That worked fine. The installation > this time around went fine. > > Now, I began using it and all worked fine. I then went to generate a PDF > file using publican and got an error that "cmd.exe" couldn't be > launched, so the PDF creation failed. I wasn't quite sure what that > problem could have been, so I went on to other things. As I was working > in the console I realized that a lot of my programs were not working, > SVN, Fossil, Gcc, all MinGW utilities, Ant, etc... All of them were > command not found! > > So, I went to check my path. Low an behold, the *only* thing in my path > was a few directories under the new publican installation! I began > fixing my path (can't remember everything that was in it, but it > probably needed purged anyway, so no big deal). Anyway, once I fixed my > path and added quite a few directories back into it (including > C:\Windows\System32) publican could then execute cmd.exe just fine and > all is working fine. > > But... that install bug is a doosy! Your path is not something you > "backup" frequently. I could see how that could be extremely frustrating > for some who install publican. > > I was asked on #docbook to report this problem to the mailing list, so > there it is. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but, hey... It sure was > nice having everything installed for docbook with one installer! Thanks! > > Jeremy Cowgar > > _______________________________________________ > publican-list mailing list > publican-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From jeremy at cowgar.com Sun Mar 21 23:14:19 2010 From: jeremy at cowgar.com (Jeremy Cowgar) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:14:19 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] Win32 Installer Woes In-Reply-To: <1269212357.2506.47.camel@localhost> References: <4BA2B08E.4030603@cowgar.com> <1269212357.2506.47.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <4BA6A84B.8020308@cowgar.com> Windows 7. Jeremy On 3/21/2010 6:59 PM, Jeff Fearn wrote: > Hi Jeremy, which version of Windows was this? > > I've tested the uninstaller on XP and Vista, and it worked OK. > > I added some checks to the uninstaller where it removes the paths, > hopefully this will avoid nulling the path when uninstalling an > incomplete install. > > From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 22 03:30:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:30:25 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003220330.o2M3UPZi022808@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|570979 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 22 05:54:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:54:43 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003220554.o2M5sh15007016@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_DEV Fixed In Version| |1.6.1 --- Comment #12 from Jeff Fearn 2010-03-22 01:54:38 EDT --- Forced UTF8 on all the time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 22 06:35:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:35:19 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 571633] Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003220635.o2M6ZJoI020261@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571633 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0 |1.6.1 --- Comment #3 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-03-22 02:35:17 EDT --- Verified for 1.6.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 22 06:43:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:43:10 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003220643.o2M6hA8A021492@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 --- Comment #13 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-03-22 02:43:07 EDT --- Verified that UTF8 em dashes and en dashes get matched and replaced in 1.6.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From dottedmag at dottedmag.net Mon Mar 22 09:27:38 2010 From: dottedmag at dottedmag.net (Mikhail Gusarov) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:27:38 +0600 Subject: [publican-list] Validation failed: NoExpand attribute Message-ID: <87hbo8wvsl.fsf@vertex.dottedmag> Hello. I have tried to build Publican 1.6 (preparing upload for Debian) and figured out that it fails trying to validate User's Guide. E.g. Building_a_Book.xml starts with %BOOK_ENTITIES; ]>
And there is no mention of NoExpand attribute in docbookx.dtd for DocBook V4.5. Am I missing something obvious? -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 834 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jfearn at redhat.com Mon Mar 22 21:55:45 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:55:45 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Validation failed: NoExpand attribute In-Reply-To: <87hbo8wvsl.fsf@vertex.dottedmag> References: <87hbo8wvsl.fsf@vertex.dottedmag> Message-ID: <4BA7E761.9030905@redhat.com> Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Hello. > > I have tried to build Publican 1.6 (preparing upload for Debian) and > figured out that it fails trying to validate User's Guide. > > E.g. Building_a_Book.xml starts with > > > > "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd" [ BOOK_ENTITIES SYSTEM "Users_Guide.ent"> %BOOK_ENTITIES; > ]> > >
id="sect-Users_Guide-Building_a_document" lang="en-US"> > > And there is no mention of NoExpand attribute in docbookx.dtd for > DocBook V4.5. > > Am I missing something obvious? Looks like the patches for at least one of the two Perl modules are missing. See https://fedorahosted.org/publican/wiki/WikiStart#Patchesforrequiredpackages Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From jfearn at redhat.com Mon Mar 22 21:58:31 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:58:31 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Build error with Publican 1.6 from source In-Reply-To: <4ac25dd31003210139k48d9cd45te29466beb315c9bb@mail.gmail.com> References: <4ac25dd31003210139k48d9cd45te29466beb315c9bb@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4BA7E807.2070709@redhat.com> Hi Alastair, Alastair Sherringham wrote: > Hello, > > I am looking into various documentation processes and came across > Publican. I downloaded Publican 1.6 source from : > > https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/u/publican/Publican-1.6.tar.gz > > I am using Ubuntu 9.10. > > However, I had problems building (using README as a guide). > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > $ perl Build.PL > Creating new 'MYMETA.yml' with configuration results > Creating new 'Build' script for 'Publican' version '1.6' > > $ ./Build > Building Publican > Setting up ar-SA > PO file 'ar-SA/Legal_Notice.po' not found! Using base XML! > Processing file tmp/ar-SA/xml_tmp/Conventions.xml > > mismatched tag at line 11, column 3, byte 800 at > /usr/lib/perl5/XML/Parser.pm line 187 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Can you confirm that the patches at https://fedorahosted.org/publican/wiki/WikiStart#Patchesforrequiredpackages have been applied to the Perl modules? > If I change line 72 of Build.PL from : > > $builder->build( > { formats => 'xml', langs => 'all', publish => 1 } ); > > to > > $builder->build( > { formats => 'xml', langs => 'en-US', publish => 1 } ); > > > It builds OK. > > Is it required or expected to set-up for every language by default? This is expected behavior. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From sherringham at gmail.com Mon Mar 22 22:16:40 2010 From: sherringham at gmail.com (Alastair Sherringham) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:16:40 +0000 Subject: [publican-list] Build error with Publican 1.6 from source In-Reply-To: <4BA7E807.2070709@redhat.com> References: <4ac25dd31003210139k48d9cd45te29466beb315c9bb@mail.gmail.com> <4BA7E807.2070709@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4ac25dd31003221516w1d72a294g215f3c63974f78a3@mail.gmail.com> On 22 March 2010 21:58, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Alastair Sherringham wrote: >> mismatched tag at line 11, column 3, byte 800 at >> /usr/lib/perl5/XML/Parser.pm line 187 >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Can you confirm that the patches at > https://fedorahosted.org/publican/wiki/WikiStart#Patchesforrequiredpackages > have been applied to the Perl modules? Thanks Jeff. That fixed things - sorry I seem to have missed the Perl patches on that page ... With the "langs" set to "all", it now completes. However, each lang does spit out a warning e.g. PO file 'de-CH/Legal_Notice.po' not found! Using base XML! Thanks for the help. -- Alastair Sherringham From jfearn at redhat.com Mon Mar 22 22:30:19 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:30:19 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Build error with Publican 1.6 from source In-Reply-To: <4ac25dd31003221516w1d72a294g215f3c63974f78a3@mail.gmail.com> References: <4ac25dd31003210139k48d9cd45te29466beb315c9bb@mail.gmail.com> <4BA7E807.2070709@redhat.com> <4ac25dd31003221516w1d72a294g215f3c63974f78a3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4BA7EF7B.1070607@redhat.com> Alastair Sherringham wrote: > On 22 March 2010 21:58, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: >> Alastair Sherringham wrote: >>> mismatched tag at line 11, column 3, byte 800 at >>> /usr/lib/perl5/XML/Parser.pm line 187 >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Can you confirm that the patches at >> https://fedorahosted.org/publican/wiki/WikiStart#Patchesforrequiredpackages >> have been applied to the Perl modules? > > Thanks Jeff. That fixed things - sorry I seem to have missed the Perl > patches on that page ... To be honest I just added that entry from an old post to the list > With the "langs" set to "all", it now completes. However, each lang > does spit out a warning e.g. > > PO file 'de-CH/Legal_Notice.po' not found! Using base XML! This is correct, we don't don't translate the Legal Notice, in fact we don't handle translated legal notices at all yet. > Thanks for the help. No worries mate :) Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From dottedmag at dottedmag.net Mon Mar 22 22:40:24 2010 From: dottedmag at dottedmag.net (Mikhail Gusarov) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:40:24 +0600 Subject: [publican-list] Validation failed: NoExpand attribute In-Reply-To: <4BA7E761.9030905@redhat.com> (Jeffrey Fearn's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:55:45 +1000") References: <87hbo8wvsl.fsf@vertex.dottedmag> <4BA7E761.9030905@redhat.com> Message-ID: <87hbo8t1yf.fsf@vertex.dottedmag> Twas brillig at 07:55:45 23.03.2010 UTC+10 when jfearn at redhat.com did gyre and gimble: >> And there is no mention of NoExpand attribute in docbookx.dtd for >> DocBook V4.5. >> >> Am I missing something obvious? JF> Looks like the patches for at least one of the two Perl modules are missing. See JF> https://fedorahosted.org/publican/wiki/WikiStart#Patchesforrequiredpackages Oh damn, I completely forgot about patch for XML::TreeBuilder. Thanks a lot. Heh, 1/2 year later, and both patches are sitting in bugtrackers without any movement. -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 834 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jfearn at redhat.com Mon Mar 22 23:07:41 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:07:41 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Validation failed: NoExpand attribute In-Reply-To: <87hbo8t1yf.fsf@vertex.dottedmag> References: <87hbo8wvsl.fsf@vertex.dottedmag> <4BA7E761.9030905@redhat.com> <87hbo8t1yf.fsf@vertex.dottedmag> Message-ID: <4BA7F83D.5070502@redhat.com> Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Twas brillig at 07:55:45 23.03.2010 UTC+10 when jfearn at redhat.com did gyre and gimble: > > >> And there is no mention of NoExpand attribute in docbookx.dtd for > >> DocBook V4.5. > >> > >> Am I missing something obvious? > > JF> Looks like the patches for at least one of the two Perl modules are missing. See > JF> https://fedorahosted.org/publican/wiki/WikiStart#Patchesforrequiredpackages > > Oh damn, I completely forgot about patch for XML::TreeBuilder. Thanks a lot. > > Heh, 1/2 year later, and both patches are sitting in bugtrackers without > any movement. Yeah, another 1/2 year and I might have to sign up for a CPAN account :D Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From jfearn at redhat.com Tue Mar 23 23:25:19 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:25:19 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican 1.6.1 Released Message-ID: <4BA94DDF.1030709@redhat.com> Hi, Publican 1.6.1 is hitting the build servers as I type! Here is the change log: - Fix package_brand including unwanted files. BZ #570715 - Fix empty lines breaking callouts. BZ #570046 - Detect verbatim content in translatable content. BZ #571633 - Fix missing IO::String requires properly. BZ #568950 - Add print style sheet to XHTML. RT #60327 - Force UTF8 on all files. BZ #570979 - Fix comments in callout breaking build. BZ #572047 - Fix table border display. BZ #572995 Happy Festivus! Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 00:13:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:13:00 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003240013.o2O0D0Yr005263@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 20:12:53 EDT --- publican-1.6.1-0.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.1-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 00:13:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:13:46 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 571633] Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003240013.o2O0DkaU005389@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571633 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 20:13:46 EDT --- publican-1.6.1-0.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.1-0.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 00:13:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:13:13 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 571633] Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003240013.o2O0DDO5005302@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571633 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 20:13:12 EDT --- publican-1.6.1-0.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.1-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 00:14:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:14:19 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 571633] Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003240014.o2O0EJWa024353@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571633 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 20:14:16 EDT --- publican-1.6.1-0.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.1-0.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 00:14:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:14:02 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003240014.o2O0E27W024306@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 20:13:59 EDT --- publican-1.6.1-0.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.1-0.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 00:13:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:13:30 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003240013.o2O0DUv8024237@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 20:13:29 EDT --- publican-1.6.1-0.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.1-0.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 00:43:29 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:43:29 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Thanks In-Reply-To: <20100319022616.GI29385@victoria.internal.frields.org> References: <20100319022616.GI29385@victoria.internal.frields.org> Message-ID: <4BA96031.6090105@redhat.com> Paul W. Frields wrote: > I've been using Publican a little more often while helping out with > some Docs work, and I felt compelled to write about how FAST it is > nowadays. It's so much easier to get work done with a more efficient > tool. Thanks for all the work that went into getting us to this > point. > Thanks Paul! Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 00:46:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:46:34 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 571633] Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003240046.o2O0kYS1030371@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571633 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 20:46:30 EDT --- publican-1.6.1-0.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 00:46:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:46:17 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003240046.o2O0kHbB011014@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 20:46:13 EDT --- publican-1.6.1-0.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 00:53:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:53:36 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 571633] Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003240053.o2O0raDf012468@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571633 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 00:53:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:53:26 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003240053.o2O0rQ1M012448@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From lbrindle at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 20:38:16 2010 From: lbrindle at redhat.com (Lana Brindley) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:38:16 +1100 Subject: [publican-list] Problem pushing to brew Message-ID: <4BAA7838.8010409@redhat.com> Hi everyone, I've just installed Publican on Fedora 12. Everything is running as expected until I try to push to brew. [lana at aao Tuna_User_Guide]$ publican package --lang=en-US --brew --scratch Running clean process to ensure stale content is not bundled in packages. Clean: Removing temporary and publish content. Setting up en-US Processing file tmp/en-US/xml/Common_Content/Conventions.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml/Common_Content/Feedback.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml/Common_Content/Legal_Notice.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/Author_Group.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/Book_Info.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/FAQs.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/Installation.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/More_Information.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/Preface.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/Revision_History.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/Testing_Tools.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/Tuna_User_Guide.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/Use_Cases.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/Using_The_CLI.xml Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/Using_The_GUI.xml Using XML::LibXSLT on /usr/share/publican/xsl/web-spec.xsl Wrote: /home/lana/Work/Red_Hat_Enterprise_MRG/1.3/Tuna_User_Guide/tmp/rpm/Red_Hat_Enterprise_MRG-Tuna_User_Guide-1.3-web-en-US-0-7.el5.src.rpm Can't exec "brew": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/publican line 530. [lana at aao Tuna_User_Guide]$ Do I need to install something extra to make this work? Thanks, Lana -- Lana Brindley Content Author II Engineering Content Services +61 7 3514 8178 - ext (85) 88178 RHEL5 RHCT: 605008757717273 "If you simplify your English, you are freed from the worst follies of orthodoxy." George Orwell, "Politics and the English Language" (1946). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: lbrindle.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 976 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 23:35:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:35:51 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003242335.o2ONZpfE015709@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-24 19:35:47 EDT --- publican-1.6.1-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 23:37:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:37:49 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 571633] Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003242337.o2ONbnZr032242@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571633 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-24 19:37:45 EDT --- publican-1.6.1-0.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 23:36:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:36:08 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 571633] Publican delete the new lines on the screen Tags when creating POTs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003242336.o2ONa8J5032044@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571633 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-24 19:36:05 EDT --- publican-1.6.1-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 24 23:37:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:37:33 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 568201] publican doesn't replace some of the translated entries. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201003242337.o2ONbXWT032209@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568201 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-24 19:37:29 EDT --- publican-1.6.1-0.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From kwade at redhat.com Sat Mar 27 19:27:47 2010 From: kwade at redhat.com (Karsten Wade) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:27:47 -0700 Subject: [publican-list] licensing defaults Message-ID: <20100327192747.GZ5501@calliope.phig.org> Why is the default license in Publican the GFDL? Why are Publican documents under the GFDL? I thought we cleaned up use of this legacy license a while ago. Default Publican license should be CC BY SA 3.0 Unported. Should I just file a bug or ...? thx - Karsten -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Gardener team: Red Hat Community Architecture uri: http://TheOpenSourceWay.org/wiki gpg: AD0E0C41 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From kwade at redhat.com Sat Mar 27 20:20:39 2010 From: kwade at redhat.com (Karsten Wade) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:20:39 -0700 Subject: [publican-list] licensing defaults In-Reply-To: <20100327192747.GZ5501@calliope.phig.org> References: <20100327192747.GZ5501@calliope.phig.org> Message-ID: <20100327202039.GA30946@calliope.phig.org> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:27:47PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > Why is the default license in Publican the GFDL? > > Why are Publican documents under the GFDL? > > I thought we cleaned up use of this legacy license a while ago. > > Default Publican license should be CC BY SA 3.0 Unported. Should I > just file a bug or ...? Sorry for the abruptness of this email. I was blasting through using Publican for a build, realized it put the content under a different license than I expected, and am busy creating a new brand[1] so I can get the intended license. I'd like to take the moment I should have before and explain myself. I recognize that Publican is a stand-alone upstream project and its developers have the right to choose whatever FLOSS license they prefer. I don't mean to be calling that in to question. First, I'm merely curious why the useage of the GFDL? Does it have advantages over the CC BY SA? (This is based on the well considered and supported opinion that the CC BY SA _does_ have advantages over the GFDL.) Second, can we consider changing the default license that Publican puts on books using the default brand to the CC BY SA 3.0 Unported? I'd be happy to rehash why Red Hat, the Fedora Project, and JBoss (aiui) have embraced the CC BY SA over other free content licenses, but I presume the Publican team knows all that. (For example, I can't remix any of the Publican documentation in to Fedora documentation or use it in a new [[Publican (publishing toolchain)]] page on Wikipedia.) cheers - Karsten -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Gardener team: Red Hat Community Architecture uri: http://TheOpenSourceWay.org/wiki gpg: AD0E0C41 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jfearn at redhat.com Sun Mar 28 23:06:26 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:06:26 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] licensing defaults In-Reply-To: <20100327202039.GA30946@calliope.phig.org> References: <20100327192747.GZ5501@calliope.phig.org> <20100327202039.GA30946@calliope.phig.org> Message-ID: <4BAFE0F2.4010609@redhat.com> Karsten Wade wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:27:47PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: >> Why is the default license in Publican the GFDL? >> >> Why are Publican documents under the GFDL? >> >> I thought we cleaned up use of this legacy license a while ago. >> >> Default Publican license should be CC BY SA 3.0 Unported. Should I >> just file a bug or ...? > > Sorry for the abruptness of this email. I was blasting through using > Publican for a build, realized it put the content under a different > license than I expected, and am busy creating a new brand[1] so I can > get the intended license. I'd like to take the moment I should have > before and explain myself. > > I recognize that Publican is a stand-alone upstream project and its > developers have the right to choose whatever FLOSS license they > prefer. I don't mean to be calling that in to question. > > First, I'm merely curious why the useage of the GFDL? Does it have > advantages over the CC BY SA? (This is based on the well considered > and supported opinion that the CC BY SA _does_ have advantages over > the GFDL.) The reason GFDL was chosen was because CC-BY-SA is not GPL compatible and it seemed odd to have software documentation that is incompatibly licensed with the software it comes with. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ccbysa > Second, can we consider changing the default license that Publican > puts on books using the default brand to the CC BY SA 3.0 Unported? This would require relicensing the Users Guide and making it incompatibly licensed with the software, I guess it's possible, but it does seem odd to me. You can currently set the license being used in the publican.cfg file, but we only ship the GFDL XML in the default brand, we could look at shipping multiple legal notices and making license a parameter for create, so you can easily pick or change the license. > I'd be happy to rehash why Red Hat, the Fedora Project, and JBoss > (aiui) have embraced the CC BY SA over other free content licenses, > but I presume the Publican team knows all that. (For example, I can't > remix any of the Publican documentation in to Fedora documentation or > use it in a new [[Publican (publishing toolchain)]] page on > Wikipedia.) Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From sherringham at gmail.com Tue Mar 30 19:13:17 2010 From: sherringham at gmail.com (Alastair Sherringham) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:13:17 +0100 Subject: [publican-list] Users Guide - Installing_a_Brand.xml - typo Message-ID: <4ac25dd31003301213v2df64efcx1a2834cbed2b4dca@mail.gmail.com> Hello, With respect to available "brands", I assume "Genome" should be "Gnome", so a simple diff attached for : trunk/publican/Users_Guide/en-US/Installing_a_Brand.xml Cheers, -- Alastair Sherringham -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: b.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 2367 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jfearn at redhat.com Tue Mar 30 21:11:44 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:11:44 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Users Guide - Installing_a_Brand.xml - typo In-Reply-To: <4ac25dd31003301213v2df64efcx1a2834cbed2b4dca@mail.gmail.com> References: <4ac25dd31003301213v2df64efcx1a2834cbed2b4dca@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4BB26910.4010909@redhat.com> Alastair Sherringham wrote: > Hello, > > With respect to available "brands", I assume "Genome" should be > "Gnome", so a simple diff attached for : Genome is correct https://fedorahosted.org/genome/, thanks for the feedback though :) Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From sherringham at gmail.com Tue Mar 30 21:22:55 2010 From: sherringham at gmail.com (Alastair Sherringham) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:22:55 +0100 Subject: [publican-list] Users Guide - Installing_a_Brand.xml - typo In-Reply-To: <4BB26910.4010909@redhat.com> References: <4ac25dd31003301213v2df64efcx1a2834cbed2b4dca@mail.gmail.com> <4BB26910.4010909@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4ac25dd31003301422xd476e7aj61e2368a057ae217@mail.gmail.com> On 30 March 2010 22:11, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Genome is correct https://fedorahosted.org/genome/, thanks for the feedback though :) Damn! Should have checked, but I was 100% sure :-) -- Alastair Sherringham From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 31 03:14:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:14:14 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 578366] New: Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578366 Summary: Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: mhideo at redhat.com ReportedBy: sflaniga at redhat.com QAContact: desktop-bugs at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: I'm running publican from a continuous build server (Hudson), and the output is a little cluttered, partly because Hudson treats logs as plain text. The same thing happens if you redirect stderr to a file and view it in plain text mode. Would it be possible to add a --quiet mode, or --color=never, or perhaps to auto-detect output streams which don't support ANSI codes? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.6.1 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. publican build > logfile 2>&1 2. /usr/bin/less logfile Actual results:  PO file 'de-DE/known_issues.po' not found! Using base XML!  PO file 'de-DE/migration.po' not found! Using base XML!  PO file 'de-DE/new_features.po' not found! Using base XML!  PO file 'de-DE/tech_previews.po' not found! Using base XML!  PO file 'de-DE/upgrading.po' not found! Using base XML!  Processing file tmp/de-DE/xml/Common_Content/Conventions.xml Expected results:  PO file 'de-DE/known_issues.po' not found! Using base XML! PO file 'de-DE/migration.po' not found! Using base XML! PO file 'de-DE/new_features.po' not found! Using base XML! PO file 'de-DE/tech_previews.po' not found! Using base XML! PO file 'de-DE/upgrading.po' not found! Using base XML! Processing file tmp/de-DE/xml/Common_Content/Conventions.xml Additional info: It would also be nice the quiet mode could override the debug option in case it is specified in publican.cfg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu Wed Mar 31 17:23:16 2010 From: josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu (Josh Kayse) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:23:16 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] Build Time Message-ID: <4BB38504.9030004@gtri.gatech.edu> We are working on a document using publican and it is taking us 2 minutes plus to build a pdf document. Is this normal or is there a way to make it go faster? Our document is currently 400 pages long with most of it being text. Let me know if you have any questions or need more info. Thanks, -josh -- A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? Don't top post: see http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html for more. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2687 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From jfearn at redhat.com Wed Mar 31 21:24:56 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 07:24:56 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Build Time In-Reply-To: <4BB38504.9030004@gtri.gatech.edu> References: <4BB38504.9030004@gtri.gatech.edu> Message-ID: <1270070696.2479.37.camel@localhost> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:23 -0400, Josh Kayse wrote: > We are working on a document using publican and it is taking us 2 > minutes plus to build a pdf document. Is this normal or is there a way > to make it go faster? Our document is currently 400 pages long with > most of it being text. This is around a third of a second per page, including pre-processing time and layout by FOP, this seems pretty standard. If most of the time is being spent after the message 'Starting pdf' is printed then it may be possible to tweak the FOP settings to make FOP faster. We haven't spent any effort researching this, so if you find out anything on making FOP faster please let us know :) Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY