From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 4 04:43:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 00:43:48 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005040443.o444hmSM027693@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfearn at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-04 00:43:45 EDT --- FYI the Fedora docbook-style-xsl package does not ship the eclipse XSL, so you will need to open a bug to get that changed before this can be addressed. Something like this is required: $ cvs diff -u docbook-style-xsl.Makefile Index: docbook-style-xsl.Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/docbook-style-xsl/devel/docbook-style-xsl.Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 docbook-style-xsl.Makefile --- docbook-style-xsl.Makefile 23 Feb 2009 10:40:22 -0000 1.8 +++ docbook-style-xsl.Makefile 4 May 2010 04:42:46 -0000 @@ -6,11 +6,12 @@ install: install-xsl install-img install-extensions install-misc install-epub install-xsl: - mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)/{common,fo,html,htmlhelp/doc,javahelp,lib,template,xhtml,xhtml-1_1,manpages,profiling,highlighting,roundtrip,website} + mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)/{common,eclipse,fo,html,htmlhelp/doc,javahelp,lib,template,xhtml,xhtml-1_1,manpages,profiling,highlighting,roundtrip,website} cp common/*.dtd $(DESTDIR)/common cp common/*.ent $(DESTDIR)/common cp common/*.xml $(DESTDIR)/common cp common/*.xsl $(DESTDIR)/common + cp eclipse/*.xsl $(DESTDIR)/eclipse cp fo/*.xml $(DESTDIR)/fo cp fo/*.xsl $(DESTDIR)/fo cp html/*.xml $(DESTDIR)/html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 4 05:35:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 01:35:47 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005040535.o445ZlBn010359@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 --- Comment #2 from Isaac Rooskov 2010-05-04 01:35:43 EDT --- Thanks Jeff, I have opened a bug for docbook-style-xsl as you have suggested, with the fix you suggest. That bug is linked to this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 4 05:33:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 01:33:52 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005040533.o445XquG010194@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 Isaac Rooskov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugzilla.redhat.com | |/show_bug.cgi?id=588613 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 4 06:10:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 02:10:08 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005040610.o446A8oA016180@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mhideo at redhat.com |jfearn at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 4 06:42:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 02:42:58 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005040642.o446gwrL011350@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_DEV Fixed In Version| |2.6.3 --- Comment #3 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-04 02:42:52 EDT --- Changed hard coded value to a config parameter, max_image_width. The default value for max_image_width is 444. Books can override this by setting max_image_width in their publican.cfg file. Brands can enforce a max width by setting max_image_width in their overrides.cfg file. No brands have had their overrides.cfg file updated as part of this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 4 06:43:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 02:43:43 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005040643.o446hhOx022799@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mhideo at redhat.com | |) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 4 06:57:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 02:57:56 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005040657.o446vuVm024745@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_DEV Fixed In Version| |2.6.3 --- Comment #3 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-04 02:57:51 EDT --- Added eclipse xsl and handling code. Added 3 new config parameters: ec_id: Eclipse plugin ID. Defaults to "$product.$docname" ec_name: Eclipse plugin name. Defaults to "$product $docname" ec_provider: Eclipse plugin provider. Defaults to "Publican-Publican::VERSION" Example plugin.xml: $ cat build/en-US/eclipse/plugin.xml You won't be able to test this unless you rebuild your docbook-style-xsl package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Wed May 5 00:47:01 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 10:47:01 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute Message-ID: <4BE0C005.4030803@redhat.com> Currently RevisionFlag isn't used by Publican, I think it can be used to aid reviewing documentation. http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ref-elements.html#common.attributes The idea being that when an author modifies a book, they set the RevisionFlag and if the book is in draft mode then Publican would highlight that tag. e.g. RevisionFlag="Changed" might have a yellow background. RevisionFlag="Added" might have a green background. RevisionFlag="Deleted" might have strike through applied. This way reviewers would get visual queues about what has happened at the tag level. It probably makes sense to only use this at the block level, para etc, but I don't see any reason to enforce that usage. When the book is ready for release, the tags marked as Deleted would need to be deleted by the author, and the remaining RevisionFlag attributes would need to be set to Off, or deleted. To aid usability we could be new action to delete all RevisionFlag attributes. e.g. $ publican clear_rev_flags Discuss! Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From r.landmann at redhat.com Wed May 5 01:40:34 2010 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 11:40:34 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <4BE0C005.4030803@redhat.com> References: <4BE0C005.4030803@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BE0CC92.5080705@redhat.com> On 05/05/2010 10:47 AM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Currently RevisionFlag isn't used by Publican, I think it can be used > to aid reviewing documentation. > > http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ref-elements.html#common.attributes > > The idea being that when an author modifies a book, they set the > RevisionFlag and if the book is in draft mode then Publican would > highlight that tag. > > e.g. > > RevisionFlag="Changed" might have a yellow background. > RevisionFlag="Added" might have a green background. > RevisionFlag="Deleted" might have strike through applied. > > This way reviewers would get visual queues about what has happened at > the tag level. > > It probably makes sense to only use this at the block level, para etc, > but I don't see any reason to enforce that usage. > > When the book is ready for release, the tags marked as Deleted would > need to be deleted by the author, and the remaining RevisionFlag > attributes would need to be set to Off, or deleted. > > To aid usability we could be new action to delete all RevisionFlag > attributes. > > e.g. $ publican clear_rev_flags > This would definitely useful during the review phase of books. At the moment, we're just inserting remarks at the section or chapter level and reviewers can only evaluate the changes by comparing the doc side-by-side with the old version. I'd like to have a red background in addition to a strikethrough for deleted content, though. I know that I would find material with a coloured background easier to locate and assess than material with just a strikethrough. Cheers Rudi From r.landmann at redhat.com Wed May 5 02:15:55 2010 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 12:15:55 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC -- Menu subheadings for Publican-driven websites Message-ID: <4BE0D4DB.7090800@redhat.com> I've been trying out the web publishing features in Publican 1.99 and it's all working very very nicely so far. It certainly makes managing a library of documentation a lot less onerous and time-consuming :) The automatically generated menus are one of the biggest time-and-effort savers in Publican 1.99; but I wonder if they could be a little more flexible? At the moment (within each language) documents are grouped by product, then version number. However, some documents might not be tied to a specific version of a product. For example, in Fedora, we have documentation for the operating system itself, which is clearly version-specific; documentation for various other software included in Fedora (like SELinux) which is also version-specific; and then we have contributor documentation like the "Translation Quick Start Guide" which is not version specific at all. Instead of having to tie these to a product version, it would be nice to group these as "All versions" or "Not version specific" or perhaps no subheading at all? I guess the danger is that enabling such a feature would be a license for people to fill such a directory with all kinds of cruft -- I think that forcing writers to think in terms of "to which version of which product does this document really apply?" has been a Good Thing in Publican so far. Therefore, I wonder what people here think is the best way to handle genuinely non-version-specific content in a documentation library? Cheers Rudi From dmison at redhat.com Wed May 5 03:43:16 2010 From: dmison at redhat.com (Darrin Mison) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 13:43:16 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC -- Menu subheadings for Publican-driven websites In-Reply-To: <4BE0D4DB.7090800@redhat.com> References: <4BE0D4DB.7090800@redhat.com> Message-ID: <8BF0EB70-96A0-4E82-B4B6-AD26B23896F0@redhat.com> On 05/05/2010, at 12:15 PM, Ruediger Landmann wrote: > I've been trying out the web publishing features in Publican 1.99 and it's all working very very nicely so far. It certainly makes managing a library of documentation a lot less onerous and time-consuming :) > > The automatically generated menus are one of the biggest time-and-effort savers in Publican 1.99; but I wonder if they could be a little more flexible? > > At the moment (within each language) documents are grouped by product, then version number. However, some documents might not be tied to a specific version of a product. For example, in Fedora, we have documentation for the operating system itself, which is clearly version-specific; documentation for various other software included in Fedora (like SELinux) which is also version-specific; and then we have contributor documentation like the "Translation Quick Start Guide" which is not version specific at all. > > Instead of having to tie these to a product version, it would be nice to group these as "All versions" or "Not version specific" or perhaps no subheading at all? > > I guess the danger is that enabling such a feature would be a license for people to fill such a directory with all kinds of cruft -- I think that forcing writers to think in terms of "to which version of which product does this document really apply?" has been a Good Thing in Publican so far. > > Therefore, I wonder what people here think is the best way to handle genuinely non-version-specific content in a documentation library? > > Cheers > Rudi Optional configuration to override of the menu generation would be handy for these situations where more flexibility is required. Perhaps on a book by book basis ? Personally I'm thinking about the idea of being able to group different products together under higher level headings would be handy, eg KDE & GNOME or RHEL & JBoss. -- Darrin Mison - Engineering Content Services -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 5 04:41:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 00:41:41 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 588999] New: when built to html, Articles present s in default fashion in contrast to Books, which use custom (and prettier and easier to read) presentation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: when built to html, Articles present s in default fashion in contrast to Books, which use custom (and prettier and easier to read) presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588999 Summary: when built to html, Articles present s in default fashion in contrast to Books, which use custom (and prettier and easier to read) presentation Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: mhideo at redhat.com ReportedBy: bforte at redhat.com QAContact: desktop-bugs at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: When the following is used in an Article: Words of wisdom here. And nonsense here. and built to html, the resultant unordered list (
    , with
  • ) presents in default fashion. eg: . Use the same markup in a Book and the custom css makes the list prettier and easier to read. eg the list below ?Enhanced C++ support? at Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.6 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: See problem description above Actual results: default css used on transformed itemizedlist markup in Articles. Desired results: custom css used on transformed itemizedlist markup in Articles (equivalent behaviour to itemized list markup in Books). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 5 04:48:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 00:48:03 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 588999] when built to html, Articles present s in default fashion in contrast to Books, which use custom (and prettier and easier to read) presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005050448.o454m33B024128@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588999 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_DEV CC| |jfearn at redhat.com Fixed In Version| |2.6.3 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-05 00:48:00 EDT --- Removed old exceptions in CSS for web site layout. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 5 04:52:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 00:52:16 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005050452.o454qGa4024419@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mhideo at redhat.com |jfearn at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 5 04:52:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 00:52:11 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 588999] when built to html, Articles present s in default fashion in contrast to Books, which use custom (and prettier and easier to read) presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005050452.o454qBG7024407@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588999 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mhideo at redhat.com |jfearn at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jwulf at redhat.com Wed May 5 05:13:39 2010 From: jwulf at redhat.com (Joshua Wulf) Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 15:13:39 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <4BE0C005.4030803@redhat.com> References: <4BE0C005.4030803@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BE0FE83.9020107@redhat.com> On 05/05/2010 10:47 AM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Currently RevisionFlag isn't used by Publican, I think it can be used > to aid reviewing documentation. > > http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ref-elements.html#common.attributes > > The idea being that when an author modifies a book, they set the > RevisionFlag and if the book is in draft mode then Publican would > highlight that tag. > > e.g. > > RevisionFlag="Changed" might have a yellow background. > RevisionFlag="Added" might have a green background. > RevisionFlag="Deleted" might have strike through applied. > > This way reviewers would get visual queues about what has happened at > the tag level. > > It probably makes sense to only use this at the block level, para etc, > but I don't see any reason to enforce that usage. > > When the book is ready for release, the tags marked as Deleted would > need to be deleted by the author, and the remaining RevisionFlag > attributes would need to be set to Off, or deleted. > > To aid usability we could be new action to delete all RevisionFlag > attributes. > > e.g. $ publican clear_rev_flags > > Discuss! > > Cheers, Jeff. > ooooh, that sounds good! Reviewers are consistently asking for this functionality. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 6 00:43:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 20:43:14 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 589371] New: [publican-jboss] Product / Documentation Site hyperlinks around the wrong way Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [publican-jboss] Product / Documentation Site hyperlinks around the wrong way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589371 Summary: [publican-jboss] Product / Documentation Site hyperlinks around the wrong way Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.7 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: mhideo at redhat.com ReportedBy: anross at redhat.com QAContact: desktop-bugs at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: The JBoss image links to redhat.com/docs, and the Red Hat images links to jboss.com :) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): publican-jboss-1.1-0.el5.noarch How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a book with brand publican-jboss 2. Build the book 3. Click the links Actual results: Links are swapped. Expected results: Additional info: Rudi is about to fix :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 6 00:44:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 20:44:50 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 589371] [publican-jboss] Product / Documentation Site hyperlinks around the wrong way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005060044.o460ioAg005161@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589371 Andrew Ross changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mhideo at redhat.com |rlandman at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 6 00:45:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 20:45:20 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 589371] [publican-jboss] Product / Documentation Site hyperlinks around the wrong way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005060045.o460jK8s005201@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589371 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 6 01:58:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 21:58:57 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 589371] [publican-jboss] Product / Documentation Site hyperlinks around the wrong way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005060158.o461wvjB012727@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589371 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-05-05 21:58:52 EDT --- Fixed in version 1.5 -- thanks for the catch! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mhideo at redhat.com Thu May 6 02:04:50 2010 From: mhideo at redhat.com (Mike Hideo) Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 12:04:50 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <4BE0C005.4030803@redhat.com> References: <4BE0C005.4030803@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BE223C2.8020108@redhat.com> On 05/05/2010 10:47 AM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Currently RevisionFlag isn't used by Publican, I think it can be used to > aid reviewing documentation. > > http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ref-elements.html#common.attributes > > The idea being that when an author modifies a book, they set the > RevisionFlag and if the book is in draft mode then Publican would > highlight that tag. > > e.g. > > RevisionFlag="Changed" might have a yellow background. > RevisionFlag="Added" might have a green background. > RevisionFlag="Deleted" might have strike through applied. > > This way reviewers would get visual queues about what has happened at > the tag level. > > It probably makes sense to only use this at the block level, para etc, > but I don't see any reason to enforce that usage. > > When the book is ready for release, the tags marked as Deleted would > need to be deleted by the author, and the remaining RevisionFlag > attributes would need to be set to Off, or deleted. > > To aid usability we could be new action to delete all RevisionFlag > attributes. > > e.g. $ publican clear_rev_flags > > Discuss! Hi Jeff, This would be extremely useful for our SME's and our QE counterparts. A really great idea. Though not nearly a great idea as: http://www.dailyhaha.com/_pics/bacon-suit.jpg but pretty close. - Mike From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 6 04:47:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 00:47:48 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005060447.o464lmdw025297@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 --- Comment #4 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-05-06 00:47:44 EDT --- Confirmed working as described in 1.6.3.t122 -- oversized images free to run off the page in both HTML and PDF -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 6 05:15:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 01:15:07 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 585115] Internal PDF table borders not the same weight as external borders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005060515.o465F7un029160@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585115 --- Comment #9 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-05-06 01:15:04 EDT --- internal borders not visible in Konqueror or Chromium in table built with version 1.6.3.t122 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 6 05:49:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 01:49:39 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 585115] Internal PDF table borders not the same weight as external borders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005060549.o465ndDa001766@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585115 --- Comment #10 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-05-06 01:49:38 EDT --- Internal borders visible in Konqueror and Chromium in table built with version 1.6.3.t150 Internal and external borders appear of similar weight in Evince. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 6 05:57:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 01:57:35 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005060557.o465vZmb002742@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 --- Comment #4 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-05-06 01:57:30 EDT --- confirmed that with docbook-style-xsl-1.75.2, publican 1.6.3.t150 builds a set of files for the eclipse target. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 6 06:54:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 02:54:51 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 475684] Find solution for using Glossaries with publican In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005060654.o466spbZ010208@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475684 --- Comment #19 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-05-06 02:54:40 EDT --- I had time to experiment a bit with this a few weeks ago; here's what I found, with help from translators: s inside a get sorted correctly (at least superficially[0]) for languages that use the Latin and Cyrillic alphabets. Languages with different writing systems present different problems: Chinese: s appear in no discernible pattern. They're probably being sorted according to Unicode codepoint. Japanese: A glossary in a Japanese technical publications could include up to four different writing systems: Latin, Katakana, Hiragana, and Kanji. Terms presented in Latin script should be separated from those presented in the three Japanese writing systems (already sorted correctly), but terms in Katakana, Hiragana, and Kanji should be interspersed according to their pronunciation. At present, we're getting all the Katakana first, then all the Hiragana, then all the Kanji. Katakana and Hiragana are syllabic scripts that represent the same 50 syllables; sorting them shouldn't be difficult and can probably be achieved easily in an update to the docbook locale. The problem is that a single Kanji character can represent one, two, or more syllables and its pronunciation (and therefore sort order) can change when combined with other Kanji. Still untested: Korean all Indic languages Korean and the various Indic languages that we support use syllabic scripts; if they aren't already working correctly, I think that should be easily fixed in the locale. I note that these sorting issues affect not only glossaries, but any books that have indexes as well. [0] not all languages sort the Latin alphabet the same way, particularly when it comes to handling accented characters or characters outside the "basic Latin" group. I didn't explore what happens at these edges. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pmorgan at redhat.com Thu May 6 12:54:59 2010 From: pmorgan at redhat.com (Paul Morgan) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 08:54:59 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <4BE0CC92.5080705@redhat.com> References: <4BE0C005.4030803@redhat.com> <4BE0CC92.5080705@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20100506125459.GA3056@redhat.com> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 11:40:34AM +1000, Ruediger Landmann wrote: > On 05/05/2010 10:47 AM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: >> Currently RevisionFlag isn't used by Publican, I think it can be >> used to aid reviewing documentation. >> >> http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ref-elements.html#common.attributes >> >> The idea being that when an author modifies a book, they set the >> RevisionFlag and if the book is in draft mode then Publican >> would highlight that tag. >> >> e.g. >> >> RevisionFlag="Changed" might have a yellow background. >> RevisionFlag="Added" might have a green background. >> RevisionFlag="Deleted" might have strike through applied. >> >> This way reviewers would get visual queues about what has >> happened at the tag level. >> >> It probably makes sense to only use this at the block level, >> para etc, but I don't see any reason to enforce that usage. >> >> When the book is ready for release, the tags marked as Deleted >> would need to be deleted by the author, and the remaining >> RevisionFlag attributes would need to be set to Off, or deleted. >> >> To aid usability we could be new action to delete all >> RevisionFlag attributes. >> >> e.g. $ publican clear_rev_flags >> > > This would definitely useful during the review phase of books. At > the moment, we're just inserting remarks at the section or chapter > level and reviewers can only evaluate the changes by comparing the > doc side-by-side with the old version. > > I'd like to have a red background in addition to a strikethrough > for deleted content, though. I know that I would find material > with a coloured background easier to locate and assess than > material with just a strikethrough. agreed with Rudi. strikethrough by itself is not enough of a visual draw. -paul From pmorgan at redhat.com Thu May 6 12:56:35 2010 From: pmorgan at redhat.com (Paul Morgan) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 08:56:35 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <4BE0C005.4030803@redhat.com> References: <4BE0C005.4030803@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20100506125635.GB3056@redhat.com> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:47:01AM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Currently RevisionFlag isn't used by Publican, I think it can be > used to aid reviewing documentation. > > http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ref-elements.html#common.attributes > > The idea being that when an author modifies a book, they set the > RevisionFlag and if the book is in draft mode then Publican would > highlight that tag. > > e.g. > > RevisionFlag="Changed" might have a yellow background. > RevisionFlag="Added" might have a green background. > RevisionFlag="Deleted" might have strike through applied. > > This way reviewers would get visual queues about what has happened > at the tag level. > > It probably makes sense to only use this at the block level, para > etc, but I don't see any reason to enforce that usage. I haven't hacked xslt enough; would change bars be possible? -paul From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 6 18:14:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 14:14:46 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 588999] when built to html, Articles present s in default fashion in contrast to Books, which use custom (and prettier and easier to read) presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005061814.o46IEkJj026770@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588999 --- Comment #2 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-05-06 14:14:43 EDT --- Confirmed fixed in 1.6.3.t150 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 6 18:29:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 14:29:26 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005061829.o46ITQUR031291@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.6.3 |1.6.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From misty at redhat.com Thu May 6 22:31:56 2010 From: misty at redhat.com (misty at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 18:31:56 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <1952443540.107421273183834464.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> I'm concerned about the way that this RevisionFlag feature would affect the workflow of the content authors. I don't know if everyone works the same way, but I do a lot of in-place sentence reworking. If I understand this correctly, I would need to either mark each sentence I change as revised, or mark a whole paragraph at a time as revised even if I only change a few words. I'm unclear whether I would need to copy/paste so that I'd have the old version still in the document, or how that would work. Can we please have some more info on the way this would work from the author's point of view? I do appreciate that it would make QE's (and engineering's) job easier. Misty From r.landmann at redhat.com Fri May 7 00:06:52 2010 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 10:06:52 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> On 05/07/2010 08:31 AM, misty at redhat.com wrote: > I'm concerned about the way that this RevisionFlag feature would affect the workflow of the content authors. > > I don't know if everyone works the same way, but I do a lot of in-place sentence reworking. If I understand this correctly, I would need to either mark each sentence I change as revised, or mark a whole paragraph at a time as revised even if I only change a few words. I'm unclear whether I would need to copy/paste so that I'd have the old version still in the document, or how that would work. > > Can we please have some more info on the way this would work from the author's point of view? I do appreciate that it would make QE's (and engineering's) job easier. > If you're reworking a document to send off for technical review or partner review, you would: set on a new paragraph (or section) added to the doc set RevisionFlag="Changed" for a changed paragraph or section leave sections to delete in place for now, but set RevisionFlag="Deleted" on them No need to copy and paste paras -- if the reviewer needs to refer to a Changed section, she or he can look at an older version of the doc. They're reading to see whether the doc makes sense *now*. Whether you would bother setting it for a change of only a few words is questionable. I'd only set it for a change of a few words if the few words corrected a serious error of some kind, or it was a change specifically requested by the reviewer on a previous review cycle. This parallels what we've already been doing with s, but makes it much clearer to reviewers as to what the changes are, while not increasing writers' workload over the existing mechanism. Cheers Rudi From r.landmann at redhat.com Fri May 7 00:30:23 2010 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 10:30:23 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC -- Menu subheadings for Publican-driven websites In-Reply-To: <8BF0EB70-96A0-4E82-B4B6-AD26B23896F0@redhat.com> References: <4BE0D4DB.7090800@redhat.com> <8BF0EB70-96A0-4E82-B4B6-AD26B23896F0@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BE35F1F.4060103@redhat.com> On 05/05/2010 01:43 PM, Darrin Mison wrote: > On 05/05/2010, at 12:15 PM, Ruediger Landmann wrote: > > >> I've been trying out the web publishing features in Publican 1.99 and it's all working very very nicely so far. It certainly makes managing a library of documentation a lot less onerous and time-consuming :) >> >> The automatically generated menus are one of the biggest time-and-effort savers in Publican 1.99; but I wonder if they could be a little more flexible? >> >> At the moment (within each language) documents are grouped by product, then version number. However, some documents might not be tied to a specific version of a product. For example, in Fedora, we have documentation for the operating system itself, which is clearly version-specific; documentation for various other software included in Fedora (like SELinux) which is also version-specific; and then we have contributor documentation like the "Translation Quick Start Guide" which is not version specific at all. >> >> Instead of having to tie these to a product version, it would be nice to group these as "All versions" or "Not version specific" or perhaps no subheading at all? >> >> I guess the danger is that enabling such a feature would be a license for people to fill such a directory with all kinds of cruft -- I think that forcing writers to think in terms of "to which version of which product does this document really apply?" has been a Good Thing in Publican so far. >> >> Therefore, I wonder what people here think is the best way to handle genuinely non-version-specific content in a documentation library? >> > Optional configuration to override of the menu generation would be handy for these situations where more flexibility is required. Perhaps on a book by book basis ? > > Personally I'm thinking about the idea of being able to group different products together under higher level headings would be handy, eg KDE& GNOME or RHEL& JBoss. > > So how about something like this as a mechanism, to draw these two ideas together: In a document's cfg file, you could set: web_group_1 (defaults to product) web_group_2 (defaults to product version) web_group_3 (defaults to -1) ... web_group_6 (defaults to -1) Six levels of nesting should be enough for anybody, right? Setting any of these parameters to "-1" would mean that it (and any web_groups underneath it) are not used. Therefore, by default, the menu would work exactly as it does now, but if people publishing docs prefer, they could set arbitrary groupings of docs, or even turn off groups entirely (by setting web_group_1: -1) In the Fedora example I used earlier, I'd change the "product" in the Translation Quick Start Guide to "Contributor Documentation" and set web_group_2: -1 in the publican.cfg file. Cheers Rudi From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 7 03:28:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 23:28:56 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 589834] Vertical Scroll bar in JBoss logo in the publican-jboss brand in Chrome and Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005070328.o473Suud011063@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589834 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 7 03:28:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 23:28:10 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 589834] Vertical Scroll bar in JBoss logo in the publican-jboss brand in Chrome and Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005070328.o473SAQh010999@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589834 Jared Morgan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |publican-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 7 03:32:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 23:32:12 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 589834] Vertical Scroll bar in JBoss logo in the publican-jboss brand in Chrome and Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005070332.o473WCuj004313@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589834 --- Comment #1 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-05-06 23:32:10 EDT --- In this case, there were fractional pixels in the /group/ although not in the page size. Specifically, the image group was a fraction of a pixel taller than the page size and a fraction of a pixel narrower than the page size. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 7 03:30:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 23:30:32 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 589834] Vertical Scroll bar in JBoss logo in the publican-jboss brand in Chrome and Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005070330.o473UWM1011333@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589834 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_DEV Fixed In Version| |1.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 7 07:16:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 03:16:05 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005070716.o477G5pA008432@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 BenC changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bclare at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from BenC 2010-05-07 03:14:52 EDT --- The plugin loads in Eclipse successfully. Branded styles are not present though. I note that the JDocBook eclipse plugin includes the JBoss community styles: eclipse classpath:/xslt/org/jboss/eclipse.xsl index.html The majority of Eclipse Help (including Hibernate Developer Guide) have little or no styling. Can we include the styles as it will add to the presentation or is styling not recommended in Eclipse Help to minimise the package size? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 10 03:43:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 23:43:33 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005100343.o4A3hXOe007561@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 --- Comment #6 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-09 23:43:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The plugin loads in Eclipse successfully. Branded styles are not present > though. > > I note that the JDocBook eclipse plugin includes the JBoss community styles: > > > eclipse > > classpath:/xslt/org/jboss/eclipse.xsl > index.html > > > The majority of Eclipse Help (including Hibernate Developer Guide) have little > or no styling. > > Can we include the styles as it will add to the presentation or is styling not > recommended in Eclipse Help to minimise the package size? It was an oversight, fixes XSL to pull in branding elements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 10 06:30:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 02:30:41 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 578366] Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005100630.o4A6UfE2002155@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578366 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.6.2 |1.6.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 10 06:30:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 02:30:11 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 585115] Internal PDF table borders not the same weight as external borders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005100630.o4A6UBVB002085@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585115 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |VERIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 10 06:31:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 02:31:06 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 589834] Vertical Scroll bar in JBoss logo in the publican-jboss brand in Chrome and Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005100631.o4A6V6Ht002197@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589834 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From davido at redhat.com Mon May 10 06:34:25 2010 From: davido at redhat.com (David O'Brien) Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:34:25 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> References: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BE7A8F1.3030502@redhat.com> Ruediger Landmann wrote: > On 05/07/2010 08:31 AM, misty at redhat.com wrote: >> I'm concerned about the way that this RevisionFlag feature would >> affect the workflow of the content authors. >> >> I don't know if everyone works the same way, but I do a lot of >> in-place sentence reworking. If I understand this correctly, I would >> need to either mark each sentence I change as revised, or mark a whole >> paragraph at a time as revised even if I only change a few words. I'm >> unclear whether I would need to copy/paste so that I'd have the old >> version still in the document, or how that would work. >> >> Can we please have some more info on the way this would work from the >> author's point of view? I do appreciate that it would make QE's (and >> engineering's) job easier. >> > > If you're reworking a document to send off for technical review or > partner review, you would: > > set on a new paragraph (or section) added to > the doc > set RevisionFlag="Changed" for a changed paragraph or section > leave sections to delete in place for now, but set > RevisionFlag="Deleted" on them > I agree with the idea of implementing these attributes to aid revision. As for actual highlighting, perhaps we could distribute a couple of different ideas for review before we decide on what constitutes Added, Changed, or Deleted. We need to be careful not to create something that conflicts with or gets confused with our existing visual styles for Notes, etc. > No need to copy and paste paras -- if the reviewer needs to refer to a > Changed section, she or he can look at an older version of the doc. > They're reading to see whether the doc makes sense *now*. I wondered about this too. A reviewer might need to recognize that a para or section has been changed, and yes it does makes sense now, but why was it changed? What exactly was changed? Did it not make sense before, was it wrong, or incomplete? If it's easy to refer to the previous version of the doc, then this might not be a problem at all. Perhaps a question for people involved in QE? This is my only question mark about the whole idea. > > Whether you would bother setting it for a change of only a few words is > questionable. I'd only set it for a change of a few words if the few > words corrected a serious error of some kind, or it was a change > specifically requested by the reviewer on a previous review cycle. > Agreed. You'd need to maintain a "I need you to recognize that this was changed and that the new version is complete and correct" approach. Tagging minor changes and typos is just making work for everyone. > This parallels what we've already been doing with s, but makes > it much clearer to reviewers as to what the changes are, while not > increasing writers' workload over the existing mechanism. > > Cheers > Rudi > my 2c -- David O'Brien Red Hat Asia Pacific Pty Ltd He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever." ~ Chinese proverb From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 10 06:59:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 02:59:39 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 545334] Invalid XML can cause hard to decipher entity errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005100659.o4A6xdAD006190@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545334 --- Comment #6 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-10 02:59:33 EDT --- Finally tracked this down and worked out how to over come this bug, am pestering upstream to get a fix for XML::TreeBuilder. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From dottedmag at dottedmag.net Mon May 10 07:08:32 2010 From: dottedmag at dottedmag.net (Mikhail Gusarov) Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 14:08:32 +0700 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 545334] Invalid XML can cause hard to decipher entity errors In-Reply-To: <201005100659.o4A6xdAD006190@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> (bugzilla@redhat.com's message of "Mon, 10 May 2010 02:59:39 -0400") References: <201005100659.o4A6xdAD006190@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <87632wqln3.fsf@leibnitz.dottedmag.net> Twas brillig at 02:59:39 10.05.2010 UTC-04 when bugzilla at redhat.com did gyre and gimble: b> Finally tracked this down and worked out how to over come this bug, b> am pestering upstream to get a fix for XML::TreeBuilder. Is there URL for this pestering? I'd like to apply the patch to Debian package in meantime. -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jfearn at redhat.com Mon May 10 07:34:28 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 17:34:28 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 545334] Invalid XML can cause hard to decipher entity errors In-Reply-To: <87632wqln3.fsf@leibnitz.dottedmag.net> References: <201005100659.o4A6xdAD006190@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> <87632wqln3.fsf@leibnitz.dottedmag.net> Message-ID: <1273476868.2652.50.camel@localhost> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 14:08 +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Twas brillig at 02:59:39 10.05.2010 UTC-04 when bugzilla at redhat.com did > gyre and gimble: > > b> Finally tracked this down and worked out how to over come this bug, > b> am pestering upstream to get a fix for XML::TreeBuilder. > > Is there URL for this pestering? I'd like to apply the patch to Debian > package in meantime. It's on the PAUSE modules list, I'm trying to get maintainer-ship of the package if I can't get in contact with the maintainer. I have to be patient though ... which I'm not a fan of :D I have a bunch of fixes for HTML::Tree, which I'm the CPAN maintainer for now, and XML::TreeBuilder, which are tightly coupled, so I'm holding back on releasing them until I can get them both updated at the same time. FYI you can track the changes to these two modules at http://github.com/jfearn, but they haven't been through CPANTS yet, so it might be wise to wait. FWIW I haven't applied these changes in Fedora ATM. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 10 08:40:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 04:40:19 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 475684] Find solution for using Glossaries with publican In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005100840.o4A8eJd1019591@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475684 --- Comment #20 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-10 04:40:11 EDT --- Hi Rudi, can we get access to this glossary? Also can we get it in an ordered list in the correct sorting order? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 11 04:15:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:15:21 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 588999] when built to html, Articles present s in default fashion in contrast to Books, which use custom (and prettier and easier to read) presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005110415.o4B4FLPr024322@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588999 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcallis at redhat.com, | |nb at fedoraproject.org, | |r.landmann at redhat.com Component|publican |publican Version|5.5 |12 Product|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 |Fedora Target Milestone|rc |--- QAContact|desktop-bugs at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 11 04:20:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:20:50 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005110420.o4B4KoYN002936@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcallis at redhat.com, | |nb at fedoraproject.org, | |r.landmann at redhat.com Component|publican |publican Version|5.7 |12 Product|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 |Fedora Target Milestone|rc |--- QAContact|desktop-bugs at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 11 04:23:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:23:10 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 494147] PDF: Articles do not include author information (orgdiv, orgname, etc) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005110423.o4B4NANu003163@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494147 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcallis at redhat.com, | |nb at fedoraproject.org, | |r.landmann at redhat.com Component|publican |publican Version|5.3 |12 Product|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 |Fedora Target Milestone|rc |--- QAContact|jwulf at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 11 04:24:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:24:02 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 559787] duplicate Revision History headings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005110424.o4B4O2Hp025204@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559787 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcallis at redhat.com, | |nb at fedoraproject.org, | |r.landmann at redhat.com Component|publican |publican Version|5.4 |12 Product|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 |Fedora Target Milestone|rc |--- QAContact|jwulf at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 11 04:20:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:20:18 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005110420.o4B4KIak024846@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcallis at redhat.com, | |nb at fedoraproject.org, | |r.landmann at redhat.com Component|publican |publican Version|5.7 |12 Product|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 |Fedora Target Milestone|rc |--- QAContact|desktop-bugs at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 11 04:19:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:19:48 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 578366] Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005110419.o4B4JmjW024776@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578366 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcallis at redhat.com, | |nb at fedoraproject.org, | |r.landmann at redhat.com Component|publican |publican Version|5.4 |12 Product|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 |Fedora Target Milestone|rc |--- QAContact|desktop-bugs at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 11 04:23:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:23:36 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 545334] Invalid XML can cause hard to decipher entity errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005110423.o4B4NaSA003238@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545334 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcallis at redhat.com, | |nb at fedoraproject.org, | |r.landmann at redhat.com Component|publican |publican Version|5.2 |12 Product|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 |Fedora Target Milestone|rc |--- QAContact|jwulf at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 11 04:31:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:31:35 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 578366] Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005110431.o4B4VZGR026048@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578366 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |VERIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 11 04:34:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:34:17 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005110434.o4B4YH1b005057@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |VERIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 11 04:34:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:34:38 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 588999] when built to html, Articles present s in default fashion in contrast to Books, which use custom (and prettier and easier to read) presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005110434.o4B4YcOE026483@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588999 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |VERIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 11 04:45:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:45:04 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005110445.o4B4j4jt028382@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |VERIFIED --- Comment #7 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-05-11 00:45:01 EDT --- verified that brands are applied to HTML files in version 1.6.2.t169 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Wed May 12 05:11:03 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 15:11:03 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican 1.6.3 released Message-ID: <4BEA3867.2050903@redhat.com> Hi everybody! Publican 1.6.3 has been released, it will appear in your repo of choice some time! :) Here is the change log from 1.6.2. * Wed May 12 2010 Jeff Fearn 1.6.3-0 - Disable verbatim hyphenation. BZ #577068 - Fix anchors breaking HTML. BZ #579069 - Fix common options not in help text. - Fix formatting of abstract in spec. BZ #579928 - Translate verbatim tags. BZ #580360 - Add print_unused option. BZ #580799 - Overwrite zero length PO files. BZ #581397 - Fix citerefentry breaking translation. BZ #581773 - Fix reference bug in html-single. - Added print_known and print_banned actions. - Fix typo in POD. Rapha?l Hertzog - Fix indexterm translation. BZ #582255 - Fix non-breaking space being treated like normal white space. BZ #582649 - Fix webkit & pdf table borders. BZ #585115 - Make indexterm translatable. BZ #582680 - Make keyword translatable. BZ #583224 - Add Eclipse help target. BZ #587489 - Convert MAX_WIDTH to a parameter max_image_width. BZ #580774 - Add confidential text to title, first, and blank pages in PDF. BZ #588980 - Add confidential_text parameter. BZ #588980 - Fix article list formatting in HTML. BZ #588999 - Fix epub validation issues. BZ #589333 - Fix xref to term with indexterm BOOM. BZ #580751 - Fix keyword highlight breaking callouts. BZ #590933 - Fix right icon misaligned. BZ #590964 Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From jfearn at redhat.com Wed May 12 22:09:56 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 08:09:56 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican 1.6.3 released In-Reply-To: <4BEA3867.2050903@redhat.com> References: <4BEA3867.2050903@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BEB2734.2080408@redhat.com> Hi, Windows installer is now up, and it now includes the Users Guide! https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/u/publican/Publican-Installer-1.6.3.exe The F12 and F13 builds are waiting for the DocBook style package to be updated. So if you are using either of those and are in a hurry to get 1.6.3, then you should test that package and add some karma to the following bhodi updates: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docbook-style-xsl-1.75.2-6.fc12?_csrf_token=902910009b7244ec861d474c41a173ae96ba5824 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docbook-style-xsl-1.75.2-6.fc13?_csrf_token=902910009b7244ec861d474c41a173ae96ba5824 Cheers, Jeff. Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Hi everybody! Publican 1.6.3 has been released, it will appear in your > repo of choice some time! :) > > Here is the change log from 1.6.2. > > * Wed May 12 2010 Jeff Fearn 1.6.3-0 > - Disable verbatim hyphenation. BZ #577068 > - Fix anchors breaking HTML. BZ #579069 > - Fix common options not in help text. > - Fix formatting of abstract in spec. BZ #579928 > - Translate verbatim tags. BZ #580360 > - Add print_unused option. BZ #580799 > - Overwrite zero length PO files. BZ #581397 > - Fix citerefentry breaking translation. BZ #581773 > - Fix reference bug in html-single. > - Added print_known and print_banned actions. > - Fix typo in POD. Rapha?l Hertzog > - Fix indexterm translation. BZ #582255 > - Fix non-breaking space being treated like normal white space. BZ #582649 > - Fix webkit & pdf table borders. BZ #585115 > - Make indexterm translatable. BZ #582680 > - Make keyword translatable. BZ #583224 > - Add Eclipse help target. BZ #587489 > - Convert MAX_WIDTH to a parameter max_image_width. BZ #580774 > - Add confidential text to title, first, and blank pages in PDF. BZ #588980 > - Add confidential_text parameter. BZ #588980 > - Fix article list formatting in HTML. BZ #588999 > - Fix epub validation issues. BZ #589333 > - Fix xref to term with indexterm BOOM. BZ #580751 > - Fix keyword highlight breaking callouts. BZ #590933 > - Fix right icon misaligned. BZ #590964 > > Cheers, Jeff. > -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From jfearn at redhat.com Thu May 13 05:55:27 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 15:55:27 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC -- Menu subheadings for Publican-driven websites In-Reply-To: <4BE35F1F.4060103@redhat.com> References: <4BE0D4DB.7090800@redhat.com> <8BF0EB70-96A0-4E82-B4B6-AD26B23896F0@redhat.com> <4BE35F1F.4060103@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BEB944F.10404@redhat.com> Ruediger Landmann wrote: > On 05/05/2010 01:43 PM, Darrin Mison wrote: >> On 05/05/2010, at 12:15 PM, Ruediger Landmann wrote: >> >> >>> I've been trying out the web publishing features in Publican 1.99 and >>> it's all working very very nicely so far. It certainly makes managing >>> a library of documentation a lot less onerous and time-consuming :) >>> >>> The automatically generated menus are one of the biggest >>> time-and-effort savers in Publican 1.99; but I wonder if they could >>> be a little more flexible? >>> >>> At the moment (within each language) documents are grouped by >>> product, then version number. However, some documents might not be >>> tied to a specific version of a product. For example, in Fedora, we >>> have documentation for the operating system itself, which is clearly >>> version-specific; documentation for various other software included >>> in Fedora (like SELinux) which is also version-specific; and then we >>> have contributor documentation like the "Translation Quick Start >>> Guide" which is not version specific at all. >>> >>> Instead of having to tie these to a product version, it would be nice >>> to group these as "All versions" or "Not version specific" or perhaps >>> no subheading at all? >>> >>> I guess the danger is that enabling such a feature would be a license >>> for people to fill such a directory with all kinds of cruft -- I >>> think that forcing writers to think in terms of "to which version of >>> which product does this document really apply?" has been a Good Thing >>> in Publican so far. >>> >>> Therefore, I wonder what people here think is the best way to handle >>> genuinely non-version-specific content in a documentation library? >>> >> Optional configuration to override of the menu generation would be >> handy for these situations where more flexibility is required. >> Perhaps on a book by book basis ? >> >> Personally I'm thinking about the idea of being able to group >> different products together under higher level headings would be >> handy, eg KDE& GNOME or RHEL& JBoss. >> >> > > So how about something like this as a mechanism, to draw these two ideas > together: I don't think the supplied examples are very useful. The first example are two are products, and are no different than how it currently works. The second example compares a product and a brand, they are not equivalent. If you do the mental exercise required to make them equivalent, you either get to the product structure we currently use, or you get in to a divisive hell you will no doubt regret soon enough. > In a document's cfg file, you could set: > > web_group_1 (defaults to product) > web_group_2 (defaults to product version) > web_group_3 (defaults to -1) > ... > web_group_6 (defaults to -1) > > Six levels of nesting should be enough for anybody, right? How do you layout 6 levels so the levels are obvious without having a ridiculous level of indentation? Given the space restriction, how do you layout more than two levels without running in to serious line wrapping issues? You need to supply a layout of how this would work. > Setting any of these parameters to "-1" would mean that it (and any > web_groups underneath it) are not used. Therefore, by default, the menu > would work exactly as it does now, but if people publishing docs prefer, > they could set arbitrary groupings of docs, or even turn off groups > entirely (by setting web_group_1: -1) > > In the Fedora example I used earlier, I'd change the "product" in the > Translation Quick Start Guide to "Contributor Documentation" and set > web_group_2: -1 in the publican.cfg file. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From jfearn at redhat.com Thu May 13 06:50:27 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 16:50:27 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> References: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BEBA133.9050100@redhat.com> Couple of mock-ups for consideration. http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/backgrounds.png http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/change-bars.png Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From dmison at redhat.com Thu May 13 07:37:58 2010 From: dmison at redhat.com (Darrin Mison) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 17:37:58 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <4BEBA133.9050100@redhat.com> References: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> <4BEBA133.9050100@redhat.com> Message-ID: <13C33D86-1393-4AF5-B65B-ACF38C673560@redhat.com> The change-bars will probably be better those people who print the drafts out. Unfortunately those people exist :-( On 13/05/2010, at 4:50 PM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Couple of mock-ups for consideration. > > http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/backgrounds.png > http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/change-bars.png > > Cheers, Jeff. > > -- > Jeff Fearn > Software Engineer > Engineering Operations > Red Hat, Inc > Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY > > _______________________________________________ > publican-list mailing list > publican-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican -- Darrin Mison - Engineering Content Services From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 13 22:21:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:21:15 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005132221.o4DMLFMg025319@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-13 18:21:12 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 13 22:20:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:20:32 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005132220.o4DMKWmh025210@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-13 18:20:31 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 13 22:21:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:21:52 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005132221.o4DMLqOw025433@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-13 18:21:49 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 13 22:22:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:22:24 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 585115] Internal PDF table borders not the same weight as external borders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005132222.o4DMMOnI025537@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585115 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-13 18:22:22 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 13 22:21:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:21:09 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 585115] Internal PDF table borders not the same weight as external borders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005132221.o4DML9Lm025304@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585115 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-13 18:21:07 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 13 22:21:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:21:31 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 578366] Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005132221.o4DMLVHI003704@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578366 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-13 18:21:28 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 13 22:20:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:20:10 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 578366] Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005132220.o4DMKAOp003406@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578366 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-13 18:20:05 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 13 22:22:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:22:30 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005132222.o4DMMUeH003874@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-13 18:22:26 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Thu May 13 22:25:56 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 08:25:56 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <13C33D86-1393-4AF5-B65B-ACF38C673560@redhat.com> References: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> <4BEBA133.9050100@redhat.com> <13C33D86-1393-4AF5-B65B-ACF38C673560@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1273789556.2885.45.camel@localhost> On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 17:37 +1000, Darrin Mison wrote: > The change-bars will probably be better those people who print the drafts out. Unfortunately those people exist :-( You already know I don't find "we have a small bunch of idiosyncratic users who ..." to be a compelling argument for choosing one thing over another. In fact it makes it more likely I'll pick the other, since when you say this it's almost inevitable that you think the other is the better selection for normal use. Maybe we need an icon off to the side? With an alt text this may make it easier for screen readers to work out what is going on? Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 13 22:30:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:30:42 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005132230.o4DMUgqc027530@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.6.3 |1.6.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 13 22:30:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:30:47 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 588999] when built to html, Articles present s in default fashion in contrast to Books, which use custom (and prettier and easier to read) presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005132230.o4DMUl3x005673@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588999 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.6.3 |1.6.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 13 22:41:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:41:38 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005132241.o4DMfcFk030055@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 --- Comment #10 from Isaac Rooskov 2010-05-13 18:41:33 EDT --- Thanks for all the hard work in making this happen :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From r.landmann at redhat.com Fri May 14 00:21:59 2010 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 10:21:59 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <13C33D86-1393-4AF5-B65B-ACF38C673560@redhat.com> References: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> <4BEBA133.9050100@redhat.com> <13C33D86-1393-4AF5-B65B-ACF38C673560@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BEC97A7.1080004@redhat.com> On 05/13/2010 05:37 PM, Darrin Mison wrote: > The change-bars will probably be better those people who print the drafts out. Unfortunately those people exist :-( > The change bars are certainly more "presentable", but I think that's a downside here -- the more presentable these features appear, the more likely it is that someone might be tempted to circulate a document like that. I think uglification is actually a virtue here, so long as it doesn't interfere with readability. I think that the coloured backgrounds are still perfectly readable, and identify the text in question more strongly than the bars do. I also like Jeff's suggestion about an icon (or perhaps text) in the margin -- this will not only help people with screen readers, but possibly also people with other visual impairments such as red/green colourblindness.[0] Cheers Rudi [0] Wikipedia says this affects 7%?10% of males to some degree: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_blindness#Prevalence From jfearn at redhat.com Fri May 14 01:39:18 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 11:39:18 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <4BEC97A7.1080004@redhat.com> References: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> <4BEBA133.9050100@redhat.com> <13C33D86-1393-4AF5-B65B-ACF38C673560@redhat.com> <4BEC97A7.1080004@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1273801158.2885.100.camel@localhost> On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 10:21 +1000, Ruediger Landmann wrote: > On 05/13/2010 05:37 PM, Darrin Mison wrote: > > The change-bars will probably be better those people who print the drafts out. Unfortunately those people exist :-( > > > > The change bars are certainly more "presentable", but I think that's a > downside here -- the more presentable these features appear, the more > likely it is that someone might be tempted to circulate a document like > that. I think uglification is actually a virtue here, so long as it > doesn't interfere with readability. > > I think that the coloured backgrounds are still perfectly readable, and > identify the text in question more strongly than the bars do. I'd rephrase that as "it should look out of place", the markup should look wrong. It should be subtle enough people can get on with reading it, but wrong enough that people don't want to ship it in a final version. > I also like Jeff's suggestion about an icon (or perhaps text) in the > margin -- this will not only help people with screen readers, but > possibly also people with other visual impairments such as red/green > colourblindness.[0] Icons or text in the margins can aid with it looking wrong, so I'll think about this some more. For those who'd like to play along, here is how I created the mock-ups. 1: Add role="(changed|added|deleted)" to the tags you want marked up. 2: build html 3: edit tmp/en-US/html/Common_Content/css/common.cs 4: add either of the following to the very end of that file Change Bars: .changed { margin-left: -8px; padding-left: 3px; border-left: 5px solid; border-color: #ffff77; } .added { margin-left: -8px; padding-left: 3px; border-left: 5px solid; border-color: #99ff99; } .deleted { margin-left: -8px; padding-left: 3px; border-left: 5px solid; border-color: #ff4455; text-decoration: line-through; } Blocks: .added { background-color: #99ff99; } .changed { background-color: #ffff77; } .deleted { background-color: #ff4455; text-decoration: line-through; } Or can use the Firefox plugin 'Web Developer' which allows you to edit the css dynamically :P Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From smumford at redhat.com Fri May 14 06:45:50 2010 From: smumford at redhat.com (Scott Mumford) Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 16:45:50 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] "linecolumn" supported for callouts? Message-ID: <4BECF19E.5020703@redhat.com> Hi all, I'm having a problem using callouts with the 'linecolumn' unit set in . I'm trying to specify callout pointers on line '*x*' at position '*y*' but, whenever I add a second coordinate, the corresponding callout pointer disappears completely. An abridged version of the code I'm using is: / Code and stuff/ Stuff and blah... Can anyone see if I've gone wrong in there somewhere? Or am I fighting a losing battle against an unsupported feature? Cheers -- Scott Mumford Associate Content Author Engineering Content Services Red Hat APAC Level 1, 193 North Quay Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia +61 7 3514 8143 smumford at redhat.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 15 20:35:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 16:35:44 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 578366] Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005152035.o4FKZijA002104@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578366 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-15 16:35:41 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update publican'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 15 20:36:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 16:36:11 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005152036.o4FKaB3l002160@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-15 16:36:10 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update publican'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 15 20:36:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 16:36:57 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005152036.o4FKavwA017071@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-15 16:36:53 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update publican'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 15 20:36:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 16:36:51 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 585115] Internal PDF table borders not the same weight as external borders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005152036.o4FKapTL017058@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585115 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-15 16:36:47 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update publican'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 15 20:45:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 16:45:28 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005152045.o4FKjSK7004831@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-15 16:45:26 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update publican'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 15 20:46:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 16:46:06 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005152046.o4FKk6QC019408@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-15 16:46:03 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update publican'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 15 20:45:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 16:45:07 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 578366] Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005152045.o4FKj71M018847@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578366 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-15 16:45:04 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update publican'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 15 20:46:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 16:46:01 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 585115] Internal PDF table borders not the same weight as external borders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005152046.o4FKk1fN019392@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585115 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-15 16:45:59 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update publican'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From davido at redhat.com Sun May 16 23:08:49 2010 From: davido at redhat.com (David O'Brien) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 09:08:49 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <4BEBA133.9050100@redhat.com> References: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> <4BEBA133.9050100@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BF07B01.3030307@redhat.com> Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Couple of mock-ups for consideration. > > http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/backgrounds.png > http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/change-bars.png > > Cheers, Jeff. > Out of these two, I prefer the use of backgrounds. Combined with strike-through for deleted material, there is little opportunity for confusion with other visual styles. The change bars on their own are pretty easy to miss (we don't all have 20-20 vision :( ). cheers -- David O'Brien Red Hat Asia Pacific Pty Ltd He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever." ~ Chinese proverb From jfearn at redhat.com Mon May 17 00:47:58 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:47:58 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] "linecolumn" supported for callouts? In-Reply-To: <4BECF19E.5020703@redhat.com> References: <4BECF19E.5020703@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1274057278.2554.38.camel@localhost> On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 16:45 +1000, Scott Mumford wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm having a problem using callouts with the 'linecolumn' unit set in > . We don't support the 'units' attribute yet, you'll have to open and RFE bug. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 05:34:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 01:34:06 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 592823] New: should not break a paragraph for translation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: should not break a paragraph for translation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592823 Summary: should not break a paragraph for translation Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: ccheng at redhat.com QAContact: desktop-bugs at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: publican interprets tags in a wrong way thus splits up a paragraph into 2 or more paragraphs in .po files. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): publican-1.6.3-0.el5 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. publican update_pot 2. publican update_po --lang= 3. Check the .po files Actual results: (From Installation Guide 6.0 FINAL, techref.xml and techref.po.) #1: To learn more about #2: Anaconda #3: anaconda, the Red Hat Enterprise Linux installation program, visit the project Web page: . Expected results: (in one string) To learn more about Anaconda anaconda, the Red Hat Enterprise Linux installation program, visit the project Web page: . Additional info: Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581773 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 05:57:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 01:57:39 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 592823] should not break a paragraph for translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005170557.o4H5vdIJ030113@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592823 Rapha?l Hertzog changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |raphael at ouaza.com --- Comment #1 from Rapha?l Hertzog 2010-05-17 01:57:34 EDT --- I requested that be translatable even outside of translatables tags (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582255). While implementing my request this change was apparently introduced. But I agree with you, it should not split a paragraph or any other translatable tag that contains an . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From andrew at beekhof.net Mon May 17 08:26:38 2010 From: andrew at beekhof.net (Andrew Beekhof) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:26:38 +0200 Subject: [publican-list] PDF filename too verbose Message-ID: Is there any chance we could allow the old filename format "$docname.pdf" as an option? I find the new form: my $pdf_name = $self->{publican}->param('product') . '-' . $self->{publican}->param('version') . '-' . $self->{publican}->param('docname') . '-' . "$lang.pdf"; far too verbose, especially since its already buried deep in a directory tree containing all the same information. Eg. publish/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/pdf/Pacemaker_Explained/Pacemaker-1.1-Pacemaker_Explained-en-US.pdf -- Andrew From dottedmag at dottedmag.net Mon May 17 08:29:38 2010 From: dottedmag at dottedmag.net (Mikhail Gusarov) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:29:38 +0700 Subject: [publican-list] PDF filename too verbose In-Reply-To: (Andrew Beekhof's message of "Mon, 17 May 2010 10:26:38 +0200") References: Message-ID: <87aarzq6bx.fsf@leibnitz.dottedmag.net> Twas brillig at 10:26:38 17.05.2010 UTC+02 when andrew at beekhof.net did gyre and gimble: AB> Eg. publish/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/pdf/Pacemaker_Explained/Pacemaker-1.1-Pacemaker_Explained-en-US.pdf Four "Pacemakers" here is especially ridiculous. -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 18:55:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:55:03 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 578366] Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171855.o4HIt3RL019985@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578366 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-17 14:54:59 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 18:56:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:56:12 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171856.o4HIuCc2002951@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-17 14:56:08 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 18:55:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:55:25 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171855.o4HItPhl002622@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-17 14:55:23 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 18:56:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:56:05 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 585115] Internal PDF table borders not the same weight as external borders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171856.o4HIu5F8002909@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585115 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-17 14:56:04 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 18:57:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:57:30 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171857.o4HIvUAa003436@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|1.6.3 |publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 18:56:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:56:46 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171856.o4HIukAd003224@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|1.6.3 |publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 18:59:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:59:18 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171859.o4HIxI8o022259@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-17 14:59:15 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 18:56:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:56:26 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 578366] Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171856.o4HIuQkp021224@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578366 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|1.6.3 |publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 18:58:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:58:56 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 578366] Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171858.o4HIwuC9004305@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578366 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-17 14:58:53 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 19:00:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:00:03 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171900.o4HJ03KS005250@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-17 14:59:59 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 18:59:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:59:56 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 585115] Internal PDF table borders not the same weight as external borders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171859.o4HIxuYT005146@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585115 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-17 14:59:55 EDT --- publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 19:00:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:00:20 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 578366] Quiet mode to disable ANSI codes in log files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171900.o4HJ0KX4005660@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578366 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 |publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 19:01:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:01:34 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 587489] Add new build target for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171901.o4HJ1Y4J024120@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587489 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 |publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 19:00:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:00:46 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 580774] Screenshots are rendered too small to be readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171900.o4HJ0kRt023365@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580774 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 |publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 19:01:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:01:24 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 585115] Internal PDF table borders not the same weight as external borders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171901.o4HJ1O4D024005@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585115 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 |publican-1.6.3-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 17 18:57:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:57:24 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 585115] Internal PDF table borders not the same weight as external borders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005171857.o4HIvOZU021793@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585115 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|1.6.3 |publican-1.6.3-0.fc13 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pmorgan at redhat.com Mon May 17 19:59:16 2010 From: pmorgan at redhat.com (Paul Morgan) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:59:16 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <13C33D86-1393-4AF5-B65B-ACF38C673560@redhat.com> References: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> <4BEBA133.9050100@redhat.com> <13C33D86-1393-4AF5-B65B-ACF38C673560@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20100517195916.GK3187@redhat.com> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 05:37:58PM +1000, Darrin Mison wrote: > The change-bars will probably be better those people who print the drafts out. Unfortunately those people exist :-( Change bars are not _just_ for document authors and reviewers. Sample use-case: Company X must use change bars for all runbook procedures to indicate changes between revisions, and these runbooks must be printed. Disregarding the level of sanity (what if there are two revs in quick succession?), the lack of change bars would cut Publican from the list of documentation products without further consideration. -paul > > On 13/05/2010, at 4:50 PM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > > > Couple of mock-ups for consideration. > > > > http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/backgrounds.png > > http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/change-bars.png > > > > Cheers, Jeff. > > > > -- > > Jeff Fearn > > Software Engineer > > Engineering Operations > > Red Hat, Inc > > Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY > > > > _______________________________________________ > > publican-list mailing list > > publican-list at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > > Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican > > -- > Darrin Mison - Engineering Content Services > > > _______________________________________________ > publican-list mailing list > publican-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican -- Paul Morgan RHCE, RHCX, RHCDS, RHCVA, RHCSS, RHCA Voice: 317-jumanji (317-586-2654) GPG Public Key ID: 0xf59e77c2 Fingerprint = 3248 D0C8 4B42 2F7C D92A AEA0 7D20 6D66 F59E 77C2 From r.landmann at redhat.com Mon May 17 22:49:57 2010 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 08:49:57 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <20100517195916.GK3187@redhat.com> References: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> <4BEBA133.9050100@redhat.com> <13C33D86-1393-4AF5-B65B-ACF38C673560@redhat.com> <20100517195916.GK3187@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BF1C815.8020502@redhat.com> On 05/18/2010 05:59 AM, Paul Morgan wrote: > Change bars are not _just_ for document authors and reviewers. > > Sample use-case: > > Company X must use change bars for all runbook procedures > to indicate changes between revisions, and these runbooks must > be printed. > > Disregarding the level of sanity (what if there are two revs > in quick succession?), the lack of change bars would cut > Publican from the list of documentation products without > further consideration. > > Just noting here that if Publican adds the role=added/changed/deleted attributes to the built HTML, then the choice between change bars and coloured backgrounds is something that can be set in the CSS of individual brands, so even if Publican's default behaviour is to use backgrounds, Company X can still implement change bars when they create their Publican brand. Cheers Rudi From jfearn at redhat.com Mon May 17 23:30:41 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 09:30:41 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC: Supporting RevisionFlag attribute In-Reply-To: <4BF1C815.8020502@redhat.com> References: <254461190.108431273185116179.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4BE3599C.6030206@redhat.com> <4BEBA133.9050100@redhat.com> <13C33D86-1393-4AF5-B65B-ACF38C673560@redhat.com> <20100517195916.GK3187@redhat.com> <4BF1C815.8020502@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1274139041.2603.13.camel@localhost> On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 08:49 +1000, Ruediger Landmann wrote: > On 05/18/2010 05:59 AM, Paul Morgan wrote: > > Change bars are not _just_ for document authors and reviewers. > > > > Sample use-case: > > > > Company X must use change bars for all runbook procedures > > to indicate changes between revisions, and these runbooks must > > be printed. > > > > Disregarding the level of sanity (what if there are two revs > > in quick succession?), the lack of change bars would cut > > Publican from the list of documentation products without > > further consideration. Meh. > Just noting here that if Publican adds the role=added/changed/deleted > attributes to the built HTML, then the choice between change bars and > coloured backgrounds is something that can be set in the CSS of > individual brands, so even if Publican's default behaviour is to use > backgrounds, Company X can still implement change bars when they create > their Publican brand. People who print HTML need to be [CENSORED]. PDF is the print format and people printing HTML will be pointed and laughed at and generally ridiculed! Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 19 04:07:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 00:07:21 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 559787] duplicate Revision History headings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005190407.o4J47LJI030993@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559787 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nb at fedoraproject.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 19 04:06:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 00:06:44 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 545334] Invalid XML can cause hard to decipher entity errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005190406.o4J46iGP030926@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545334 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nb at fedoraproject.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 19 04:07:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 00:07:21 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 494147] PDF: Articles do not include author information (orgdiv, orgname, etc) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005190407.o4J47Lpr031545@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494147 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nb at fedoraproject.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 19 04:06:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 00:06:44 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 588999] when built to html, Articles present s in default fashion in contrast to Books, which use custom (and prettier and easier to read) presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005190406.o4J46iAS031473@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588999 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nb at fedoraproject.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jmorgan at redhat.com Wed May 19 22:22:31 2010 From: jmorgan at redhat.com (Jared Morgan) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 18:22:31 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] Feedback from internal Publican User In-Reply-To: <733670.130.1274307602314.JavaMail.jmorgan@dhcp-1-169.bne.redhat.com> Message-ID: <5079913.133.1274307917579.JavaMail.jmorgan@dhcp-1-169.bne.redhat.com> I've been communicating with Jonathan Haliday about some problems he's been having with working out how to obtain jboss and rh brands. He went to the trouble of checking out the source and copying front matter files where they needed to go. He was quite frustrated that he had to do this, and that there were no instructions about how to obtain the internal brands. He has a valid point. Publican is being used wider than ECS now, and we need to cater for that. I wonder if we could include something in the PUG for RH employees: ? How to download brands, and the location of brew. If an external publican user tries to get the files, they will be out of luck because brew is internal, right?. ? The publican-list email address could also be mentioned in the guide. Perhaps not a full email (to prevent bots harvesting the address), but a mention that you should join the list using the RH mailman system. What are your thoughts about this? Cheers Jared Morgan Content Author Red Hat Asia Pacific 1/193 North Quay BRISBANE QLD 4000 P: +61 7 3514 8242 M: +61 413 005 479 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 19 22:59:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 18:59:49 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 592823] should not break a paragraph for translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005192259.o4JMxnHU025710@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592823 Manuel Ospina changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mospina at redhat.com Severity|medium |high --- Comment #2 from Manuel Ospina 2010-05-19 18:59:44 EDT --- As this bug affect the readability and clarity of the strings to be translated, leaving half phrases out of context, I have increase the severity of this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Wed May 19 23:10:41 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 09:10:41 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Feedback from internal Publican User In-Reply-To: <5079913.133.1274307917579.JavaMail.jmorgan@dhcp-1-169.bne.redhat.com> References: <5079913.133.1274307917579.JavaMail.jmorgan@dhcp-1-169.bne.redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BF46FF1.3010906@redhat.com> Jared Morgan wrote: > I've been communicating with Jonathan Haliday about some problems he's > been having with working out how to obtain jboss and rh brands. He went > to the trouble of checking out the source and copying front matter files > where they needed to go. He was quite frustrated that he had to do > this, and that there were no instructions about how to obtain the > internal brands. This, along with other issues fedora users will experience trying to use internal systems, has been documented internally for sometime on your ECS wiki: https://engineering.redhat.com/trac/ContentServices/wiki/LifeHacks#Brandissues > He has a valid point. Publican is being used wider than ECS now, and we > need to cater for that. > > I wonder if we could include something in the PUG for RH employees: The PUG is for public consumption and shouldn't contain Red Hat specific content. We are actively removing or generalizing such content. > * How to download brands, and the location of brew. If an external > publican user tries to get the files, they will be out of luck > because brew is internal, right?. The real solution is for ECS to get these brands accepted in to fedora. The legal issues that prevented them being accepted previously have been overcome by the license change. '4.4. Packaging a brand' could be expanded with generic examples of how to build and install a brand locally: RPM example: $ cd $ publican package --binary $ sudo rpm -Uvh tmp/rpm/noarch/*.rpm Direct Install example: $ cd $ publican build --formats=xml --langs=all --publish $ sudo publican installbrand --path=/usr/share/publican/Common_Content/ > * The publican-list email address could also be mentioned in the > guide. Perhaps not a full email (to prevent bots harvesting the > address), but a mention that you should join the list using the RH > mailman system. This could be added to the 'We Need Feedback!' section. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 20 00:03:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 20:03:29 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 593887] Terse validity error messages make troubleshooting XML structure issues difficult. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005200003.o4K03TM1003786@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593887 Jared Morgan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |publican-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Thu May 20 08:08:33 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 18:08:33 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] RFC -- Menu subheadings for Publican-driven websites In-Reply-To: <4BE0D4DB.7090800@redhat.com> References: <4BE0D4DB.7090800@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BF4EE01.10501@redhat.com> FYI I am working on making the current label structure customizable, this requires some DB changes. If you are building from TRUNK and using the website code, you will need to update your databases BEFORE updating from trunk. 1: Add the new columns to the DB $ sqlite3 .db sqlite> ALTER TABLE main.books ADD COLUMN product_label text(255); sqlite> ALTER TABLE main.books ADD COLUMN version_label text(255); sqlite> ALTER TABLE main.books ADD COLUMN name_label text(255); sqlite> .quit 2: Rebuild and install a new Publican from trunk 3: Update your site $ publican update_site --site_config .cfg Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Thu May 20 16:56:53 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:56:53 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] a suggestion for publican user guide, ubuntu installation section Message-ID: http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/Publican/chap-Users_Guide-Installing_Publican.html#sect-Users_Guide-Installing_Publican_on_Linux_operating_systems-Installing_Publican_on_Ubuntu while, technically, that section is correct, given that 10.04 (lucid lynx) is out now, it would seem to make more sense to move that last sentence to the top -- as in, if you're running 10.04, just $ sudo apt-get install publican and *after* that, get into the miserable details of what happens otherwise. since most people will be running the official release, it will allow them to stop reading after the first sentence. :-) rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Thu May 20 17:17:08 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 13:17:08 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] random observations about online user guide Message-ID: just some apparent oddities or errors in the user guide, if i may: http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/Publican/chap-Users_Guide-Publican_commands.html 1) reference to apparently non-existent "-v" global option 2) reference to apparently non-existent "lang_stats" action -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Thu May 20 18:08:53 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 14:08:53 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] "publican create --help" output seems inconsistent Message-ID: (i apologize for this rapid collection of complaints/observations, but i was asked if i could give a short tutorial on publican so i'm going thru the docs and help info carefully just to check for gotchas. in short, i am not *trying* to be annoying -- i am merely succeeding.) $ publican create --help create Create a new Book|Set|Article Options: --name= The name of the Book|Article|Set|Brand --version= The version of the product --edition= The edition of the Book|Article|Set --product= The name of the product --brand= The brand to use --lang= The language the XML will be written in --type= The type (Book|Article|Set) $ why does the intro line refer to "Book|Set|Article", while the "--name" line additionally refers to the possible creation of a "Brand" as well? should those two sets not be identical? oh, and the "--type" and "--edition" lines go back to *not* mentioning a "Brand." rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Thu May 20 21:20:27 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 17:20:27 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] should a new Book/Article/Set dir have an images/icon.svg file? Message-ID: as a test, i created one each of a new Book, Article and Set, and ch 3 in the user guide suggests that the directory structure created would have an images/ directory, with an icon.svg file. the images/ directory is there, but is empty. so what is the user guide trying to say? (this is publican on ubuntu 10.04.) rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From mhideo at redhat.com Thu May 20 21:51:47 2010 From: mhideo at redhat.com (Mike Hideo) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 07:51:47 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] random observations about online user guide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4BF5AEF3.1090602@redhat.com> On 05/21/2010 03:17 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > <-- snip --> > 2) reference to apparently non-existent "lang_stats" action The above is one one of my favourite commands: [mhideo at dhcp-1-147 Cluster_Suite_Overview]$ publican lang_stats --lang=ja-JP DEBUG: Publican: config loaded ================================================================================== File Name Untranslated Fuzzy Translated ================================================================================== ja-JP/About.po 0 0 402 ja-JP/Book_Info.po 0 0 25 ja-JP/Cluster_Suite_Overview.po 0 0 0 ja-JP/RHCM_Overview.po 0 0 1887 ja-JP/RHCS_Component_Summary.po 0 0 1865 ja-JP/RHCS_Overview.po 0 0 10582 ja-JP/Revision_History.po 0 0 10 ================================================================================== Total for ja-JP 0 0 14771 Remaining hours for ja-JP 0.00 0.00 ================================================================================== From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Thu May 20 22:15:32 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 18:15:32 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] random observations about online user guide In-Reply-To: <4BF5AEF3.1090602@redhat.com> References: <4BF5AEF3.1090602@redhat.com> Message-ID: On Fri, 21 May 2010, Mike Hideo wrote: > On 05/21/2010 03:17 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > <-- snip --> > > > 2) reference to apparently non-existent "lang_stats" action > > The above is one one of my favourite commands: > > [mhideo at dhcp-1-147 Cluster_Suite_Overview]$ publican lang_stats --lang=ja-JP > > DEBUG: Publican: config loaded > ... snip ... i suspect, then, that ubuntu has an older version of publican in their repos: $ publican lang_stats --lang=ja-JP Unknown option: lang Usage: publican publican ... snip ... and, as i mentioned, "publican help_actions" doesn't list "lang_stats" as a valid action. bummer. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Thu May 20 22:32:22 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 18:32:22 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] how does one request that ubuntu update its publican package? Message-ID: i suspect this is more a ubuntu packagers' issue, but how would one put in a request to package a newer version of publican for ubuntu? currently, the newest ubuntu package is version 1.0~20090927-2 and it seems pretty clear that that's out of date based on what i've seen. also, i don't see any publican brand packages for ubuntu -- there is a single ubuntu package, publican, which appears to incorporate the publican documentation as well. is it perhaps a red hat trademark or copyright issue that ubuntu wasn't allowed to also package the branding content? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From dottedmag at dottedmag.net Thu May 20 22:46:17 2010 From: dottedmag at dottedmag.net (Mikhail Gusarov) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 05:46:17 +0700 Subject: [publican-list] how does one request that ubuntu update its publican package? In-Reply-To: (Robert P. J. Day's message of "Thu, 20 May 2010 18:32:22 -0400 (EDT)") References: Message-ID: <87mxvu2nuu.fsf@leibnitz.dottedmag.net> Twas brillig at 18:32:22 20.05.2010 UTC-04 when rpjday at crashcourse.ca did gyre and gimble: RPJD> i suspect this is more a ubuntu packagers' issue, but how would RPJD> one put in a request to package a newer version of publican for RPJD> ubuntu? currently, the newest ubuntu package is version RPJD> 1.0~20090927-2 and it seems pretty clear that that's out of date RPJD> based on what i've seen. RPJD> also, i don't see any publican brand packages for ubuntu -- RPJD> there is a single ubuntu package, publican, which appears to RPJD> incorporate the publican documentation as well. is it perhaps a RPJD> red hat trademark or copyright issue that ubuntu wasn't allowed RPJD> to also package the branding content? Ubuntu package is sucked automatically from Debian, and I was too lazy to package brands for it (Debian). Regarding version: they stop syncing at some point in release cycle. -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Thu May 20 22:56:09 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 18:56:09 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] how does one request that ubuntu update its publican package? In-Reply-To: <87mxvu2nuu.fsf@leibnitz.dottedmag.net> References: <87mxvu2nuu.fsf@leibnitz.dottedmag.net> Message-ID: On Fri, 21 May 2010, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Ubuntu package is sucked automatically from Debian, and I was too > lazy to package brands for it (Debian). > > Regarding version: they stop syncing at some point in release cycle. ok, thanks. i'm new to ubuntu so i'm still getting the hang of the packaging strategies. i'll keep reading and i'll probably end up building from source if there's no other option. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From hertzog at debian.org Fri May 21 05:55:59 2010 From: hertzog at debian.org (Raphael Hertzog) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 07:55:59 +0200 Subject: [publican-list] how does one request that ubuntu update its publican package? In-Reply-To: References: <87mxvu2nuu.fsf@leibnitz.dottedmag.net> Message-ID: <20100521055559.GA14393@rivendell> Hi, On Thu, 20 May 2010, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Fri, 21 May 2010, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > > > Ubuntu package is sucked automatically from Debian, and I was too > > lazy to package brands for it (Debian). > > > > Regarding version: they stop syncing at some point in release cycle. > > ok, thanks. i'm new to ubuntu so i'm still getting the hang of the > packaging strategies. i'll keep reading and i'll probably end up > building from source if there's no other option. The package is "arch: all" so you can pick it up from the Debian repo and it should install just fine. http://packages.debian.org/sid/publican Cheers, -- Rapha?l Hertzog Like what I do? Sponsor me: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/05/5-years-of-freexian/ My Debian goals: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/09/debian-related-goals-for-2010/ From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Fri May 21 09:13:23 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 05:13:23 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] how does one request that ubuntu update its publican package? In-Reply-To: <20100521055559.GA14393@rivendell> References: <87mxvu2nuu.fsf@leibnitz.dottedmag.net> <20100521055559.GA14393@rivendell> Message-ID: On Fri, 21 May 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 20 May 2010, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Fri, 21 May 2010, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > > > > > Ubuntu package is sucked automatically from Debian, and I was too > > > lazy to package brands for it (Debian). > > > > > > Regarding version: they stop syncing at some point in release cycle. > > > > ok, thanks. i'm new to ubuntu so i'm still getting the hang of the > > packaging strategies. i'll keep reading and i'll probably end up > > building from source if there's no other option. > > The package is "arch: all" so you can pick it up from the Debian repo and > it should install just fine. > > http://packages.debian.org/sid/publican fair enough, but should i submit a bug report for what seems to be a (minor) bug in the ubuntu packaging? running "publican --help" clearly suggests that "publican --man" is a valid invocation, but if you run that latter command, what you get is (weirdly) a listing of the /usr/bin/publican script, followed by: You need to install the perl-doc package to use this program. installing perl-doc fixes the issue, so shouldn't the ubuntu publican package have perl-doc as a required dependency? (sorry, i realize that this is more a ubuntu issue than a publican issue.) rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 21 09:13:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 05:13:04 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 592823] should not break a paragraph for translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005210913.o4L9D4sP000879@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592823 --- Comment #3 from Rapha?l Hertzog 2010-05-21 05:12:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=415618) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=415618) Proposed patch The attached patch adds indexterm to IGNOREBLOCKS so that it doesn't split translatable tags like it does currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 21 09:20:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 05:20:36 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 592823] should not break a paragraph for translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005210920.o4L9KaP4013562@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592823 --- Comment #4 from Rapha?l Hertzog 2010-05-21 05:20:29 EDT --- Hum somehow this doesn't work as expected. is no longer caught outside of translatable tags with this patch despite the fact that it's still listed in $TRANSTAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From hertzog at debian.org Fri May 21 09:54:41 2010 From: hertzog at debian.org (Raphael Hertzog) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 11:54:41 +0200 Subject: [publican-list] how does one request that ubuntu update its publican package? In-Reply-To: References: <87mxvu2nuu.fsf@leibnitz.dottedmag.net> <20100521055559.GA14393@rivendell> Message-ID: <20100521095441.GA3388@rivendell> On Fri, 21 May 2010, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > fair enough, but should i submit a bug report for what seems to be a > (minor) bug in the ubuntu packaging? running "publican --help" > clearly suggests that "publican --man" is a valid invocation, but if > you run that latter command, what you get is (weirdly) a listing of > the /usr/bin/publican script, followed by: > > You need to install the perl-doc package to use this program. > > installing perl-doc fixes the issue, so shouldn't the ubuntu publican > package have perl-doc as a required dependency? (sorry, i realize > that this is more a ubuntu issue than a publican issue.) One might wonder why publican calls perldoc instead of just running "man publican". Adding perl-doc as dependency seems like overkill given that publican --man is not really a critical feature. I might add it to Suggests but then it makes no difference as far as APT is concerned. BTW, both Debian and Ubuntu have bugtrackers for the packaging problems. Please use those for such problems. Cheers, -- Rapha?l Hertzog Like what I do? Sponsor me: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/05/5-years-of-freexian/ My Debian goals: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/09/debian-related-goals-for-2010/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 21 13:43:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 09:43:19 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 592823] should not break a paragraph for translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005211343.o4LDhJDp006075@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592823 --- Comment #5 from Rapha?l Hertzog 2010-05-21 09:43:16 EDT --- Trying to fix this, I discovered that's because $node->look_up() (from XML::Element) would happily return the element itself. So the following change is also needed: @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ sub get_msgs { qr/$TRANSTAGS/, sub { not defined( - $_[0]->look_up( + $_[0]->parent()->look_up( '_tag', qr/$IGNOREBLOCKS/, sub { With this, doesn't split the anymore but it still doesn't appear in the translation string of the para, it has its own string. This might be ok but I have not been able to find the proper way to keep it inline. I'm not sure whether the above change has other undesired side-effects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 22 02:11:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 22:11:13 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 592823] should not break a paragraph for translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005220211.o4M2BDUU025396@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592823 --- Comment #6 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-21 22:11:12 EDT --- Hi Rapha?l, which tree are you creating your patch against? There is already a patch for this checked in on the 1.6 branch, it's waiting for testing before this bug can be updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 22 02:25:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 22:25:33 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 592823] should not break a paragraph for translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005220225.o4M2PXLH029262@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592823 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_DEV --- Comment #7 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-21 22:25:30 EDT --- Gah, I just noticed this is still in new ... more coffee needed :( Fixed in build 1.6.3-0.f12.t67 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Sat May 22 02:36:51 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 12:36:51 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] a suggestion for publican user guide, ubuntu installation section In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1274495811.2493.0.camel@localhost> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 12:56 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/Publican/chap-Users_Guide-Installing_Publican.html#sect-Users_Guide-Installing_Publican_on_Linux_operating_systems-Installing_Publican_on_Ubuntu > > while, technically, that section is correct, given that 10.04 (lucid > lynx) is out now, it would seem to make more sense to move that last > sentence to the top -- as in, if you're running 10.04, just > > $ sudo apt-get install publican > > and *after* that, get into the miserable details of what happens > otherwise. since most people will be running the official release, it > will allow them to stop reading after the first sentence. :-) Hi Robert, I had a chat with Rudi and he agreed to update this section. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From jfearn at redhat.com Sat May 22 02:43:07 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 12:43:07 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] should a new Book/Article/Set dir have an images/icon.svg file? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1274496187.2493.4.camel@localhost> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 17:20 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > as a test, i created one each of a new Book, Article and Set, and > ch 3 in the user guide suggests that the directory structure created > would have an images/ directory, with an icon.svg file. the images/ > directory is there, but is empty. so what is the user guide trying to > say? (this is publican on ubuntu 10.04.) Hi Robert, this is a bug in the docs. This will be fixed as part of BZ #593890 which will change how icons are being used. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From jfearn at redhat.com Sat May 22 02:58:47 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 12:58:47 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] how does one request that ubuntu update its publican package? In-Reply-To: <20100521095441.GA3388@rivendell> References: <87mxvu2nuu.fsf@leibnitz.dottedmag.net> <20100521055559.GA14393@rivendell> <20100521095441.GA3388@rivendell> Message-ID: <1274497127.2493.11.camel@localhost> On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 11:54 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 21 May 2010, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > fair enough, but should i submit a bug report for what seems to be a > > (minor) bug in the ubuntu packaging? running "publican --help" > > clearly suggests that "publican --man" is a valid invocation, but if > > you run that latter command, what you get is (weirdly) a listing of > > the /usr/bin/publican script, followed by: > > > > You need to install the perl-doc package to use this program. > > > > installing perl-doc fixes the issue, so shouldn't the ubuntu publican > > package have perl-doc as a required dependency? (sorry, i realize > > that this is more a ubuntu issue than a publican issue.) > > One might wonder why publican calls perldoc instead of just running "man > publican". Publican uses the Pod::Usage module for this, which is the "correct way" AIUI for cross platform support. > Adding perl-doc as dependency seems like overkill given that publican > --man is not really a critical feature. I might add it to Suggests but > then it makes no difference as far as APT is concerned. It sounds like the Pod::Usage module has a deps issue, this is the line that will be causing this issue: pod2usage( -verbose => 2, -exit => 0 ) if $man; > BTW, both Debian and Ubuntu have bugtrackers for the packaging problems. > Please use those for such problems. :) Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 22 06:23:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 02:23:16 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 592823] should not break a paragraph for translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005220623.o4M6NGvC030640@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592823 --- Comment #8 from Rapha?l Hertzog 2010-05-22 02:23:14 EDT --- Hi Jeff, my patch was against the 1.6.3 tarball. So this bug is fixed by r1215 and is in fact the same than https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592666 if I understand correctly. You might want to merge both entries then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 25 01:26:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 21:26:47 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 595564] New: RFE: can xref links to formalpara go to the actual formalpara, rather than top of the page? Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: RFE: can xref links to formalpara go to the actual formalpara, rather than top of the page? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595564 Summary: RFE: can xref links to formalpara go to the actual formalpara, rather than top of the page? Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: publican AssignedTo: mhideo at redhat.com ReportedBy: mmcallis at redhat.com QAContact: desktop-bugs at redhat.com CC: publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Description of problem: When you give a formalpara an ID, and attempt to link to that part of the document, the link goes to the top of the page that contains the formalpara, rather than to the formalpara itself. This causes issues if you have a page full of formalpara, and want to link to a specific one/part of the document. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): * publican-1.6.3-0.el5 * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client release 5.5 (Tikanga) How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. create a document with a list of formalpara on a single page. 2. attempt to link to one with xref linkend. Actual results: If on the same page as the formalpara when you click the link, nothing happens. If on a different page or section, the link takes you to the top of the page containing the formalpara you are trying to get to. Expected results: If possible, the link takes you to the formalpara. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 25 10:09:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 06:09:11 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 595564] RFE: can xref links to formalpara go to the actual formalpara, rather than top of the page? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005251009.o4PA9B6i022090@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595564 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mhideo at redhat.com |jfearn at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 25 10:08:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 06:08:49 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 595564] RFE: can xref links to formalpara go to the actual formalpara, rather than top of the page? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005251008.o4PA8nJj022032@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595564 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_DEV CC| |jfearn at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-25 06:08:48 EDT --- formalpara was missing it's ID. Set ID. Build 1.6.3-0.t77 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 25 21:39:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:39:21 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 595564] RFE: can xref links to formalpara go to the actual formalpara, rather than top of the page? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005252139.o4PLdL8l031389@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595564 --- Comment #2 from Murray McAllister 2010-05-25 17:39:20 EDT --- Awesome, thanks for quickly fixing this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 26 05:41:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 01:41:16 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 593887] Terse validity error messages make troubleshooting XML structure issues difficult. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005260541.o4Q5fGP8015476@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593887 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_DEV --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-26 01:41:12 EDT --- The text of the message, 'failed build URL', is supplied by libxml, if you want that changed you will need to open a bug upstream. I reformatted the error message and included the line and error numbers: e.g. FATAL ERROR 1605 in Users_Guide.xml on line 10: failed build URL FYI since the href in xi:include is a URI string you need to escape spaces in it: e.g. wrong: right: Fixed in build 1.6.3-0.t81 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 26 05:53:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 01:53:47 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 593887] Terse validity error messages make troubleshooting XML structure issues difficult. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005260553.o4Q5rlOu017351@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593887 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-26 01:53:45 EDT --- I added the domain in, since it's useful. FATAL ERROR: XInclude:1605 in Users_Guide.xml on line 10: failed build URL Fixed in build 1.6.3-0.t83 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 26 23:20:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:20:37 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 596257] RFE: do not split admonitions across pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005262320.o4QNKb6M017117@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596257 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |publican-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 26 23:23:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:23:29 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 596257] RFE: do not split admonitions across pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005262323.o4QNNTkI019281@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596257 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-26 19:23:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Created an attachment (id=416830) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=416830) [details] > Screenshot of the problem > > It doesn't look good when admonitions (note, important, warning) span across > the page break -- witness attached screenshot. Adding list to CC for public discussion. The problem with keep-together.within-column in FOP is that the content will never be broken across a page border, even if the content is larger than a page. IMHO having an admonition that large is ... well, lets just say I think we should do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From r.landmann at redhat.com Thu May 27 05:01:50 2010 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 15:01:50 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 596257] RFE: do not split admonitions across pages In-Reply-To: <201005262323.o4QNNTkI019281@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> References: <201005262323.o4QNNTkI019281@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <4BFDFCBE.4010902@redhat.com> On 05/27/2010 09:23 AM, bugzilla at redhat.com wrote: > > Adding list to CC for public discussion. > > The problem with keep-together.within-column in FOP is that the content will > never be broken across a page border, even if the content is larger than a > page. > > IMHO having an admonition that large is ... well, lets just say I think we > should do this. > > Yeah; if your admonition is longer than an A4 page, I think there are bigger problems.... This seems like a sensible change to me, particularly since although a Note or Important split across a page is ugly and annoying, having a warning split across a page might even be dangerous. Cheers Rudi From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 27 06:08:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 02:08:16 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 592823] should not break a paragraph for translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005270608.o4R68GEL021310@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592823 Chester Cheng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|publican |publican Version|5.3 |6.0 Product|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 |Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 QAContact|desktop-bugs at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 27 06:11:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 02:11:38 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 592823] should not break a paragraph for translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005270611.o4R6Bcsl032691@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592823 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 27 06:17:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 02:17:22 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 592823] should not break a paragraph for translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005270617.o4R6HMl6001184@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592823 --- Comment #10 from Chester Cheng 2010-05-27 02:17:19 EDT --- Change Product to RHEL6, since this affects all the documents to be used in RHEL6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Thu May 27 12:07:38 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 08:07:38 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] is publican-1.99 available to play with under ubuntu? Message-ID: i'd like to test publican-1.99 -- is it available/buildable under ubuntu 10.04? sadly, my fedora system is moving from f12 to f13 so it's not available. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From mylists at teambla.com Thu May 27 22:45:59 2010 From: mylists at teambla.com (Bram Vogelaar) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 00:45:59 +0200 Subject: [publican-list] is publican-1.99 available to play with under ubuntu? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1E29B955-06EF-4681-BCA7-1B62498713BA@teambla.com> i havent found any .debs yet but if you managed to install the 1.6.3 version (and xml- and html- treebuilder .debs) from the debian repository its a breeze to install from svn trunk. cd /path/to/svn/checkouts svn co http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/publican cd publican/trunk/publican perl Build.Pl install missing dependecies (6 -ish ) via your favorite package manager. (synaptic package manager => search for perl and then select correct ones) ./Build ./Build test sudo ./Build install and then "Hup Hup Hup, Barbatruc" your done have fun with it, the new website feature is awesome bram On 27 May 2010, at 14:07, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > i'd like to test publican-1.99 -- is it available/buildable under > ubuntu 10.04? sadly, my fedora system is moving from f12 to f13 so > it's not available. > > rday > > -- > > ======================================================================== > Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA > > Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. > > Web page: http://crashcourse.ca > Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday > ======================================================================== > > _______________________________________________ > publican-list mailing list > publican-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican From jfearn at redhat.com Fri May 28 06:43:36 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeffrey Fearn) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 16:43:36 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican 1.99: Another DB change & XML Sitemaps Message-ID: <4BFF6618.9030806@redhat.com> Hi, if you are following the 1.99 trunk you will need to update your DB's again. ALTER TABLE main.books ADD COLUMN update_date text(10); update_date is used in creating the new XML Sitemap, http://www.sitemaps.org/faq.php, these are used by the major search engines to aid keeping site searches up to date. Basically you tell the search engines where your Sitemap file is and it will use the dates in that file to see what has changed without crawling your entire site. You can validate the Sitemap like so: $ xmllint --schema http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd --noout public_html/Sitemap public_html/Sitemap validates For HTML it only specifies index.html, since, AIUI, this will kick off a spider of that page and what it links to ... we will have to wait and see if this is what is required. It also lists PDF and EPUB files. Also, amongst other bug fixes, I made it so installing a book that is already installed updates the database instead of burping an error. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Fri May 28 08:16:38 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 04:16:38 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] is publican-1.99 available to play with under ubuntu? In-Reply-To: <1E29B955-06EF-4681-BCA7-1B62498713BA@teambla.com> References: <1E29B955-06EF-4681-BCA7-1B62498713BA@teambla.com> Message-ID: On Fri, 28 May 2010, Bram Vogelaar wrote: > i havent found any .debs yet but if you managed to install the 1.6.3 > version (and xml- and html- treebuilder .debs) from the debian > repository its a breeze to install from svn trunk. > > cd /path/to/svn/checkouts > svn co http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/publican > cd publican/trunk/publican > perl Build.Pl > install missing dependecies (6 -ish ) via your favorite package manager. (synaptic package manager => search for perl and then select correct ones) > ./Build > ./Build test > sudo ./Build install > > and then "Hup Hup Hup, Barbatruc" your done > > have fun with it, the new website feature is awesome taking a stab at installing 1.99 on my ubuntu 10.04 box, the following *seems* to have done it but i'm willing to be corrected -- i'm still new at ubuntu. i grabbed the two noarch rpms from here: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/publican/ used "alien" to simple-mindedly convert them to .deb files, installed them and a few tests of running "publican --help" convinced me to: 1) export PERL5LIB=/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 and 2) install the ubuntu packages * libarchive_zip_perl * libdbi_perl * libtemplate_perl at which point i can at least run "publican --help" and have it work. beyond that, i haven't done any testing so i have no idea what else will fail as i look for the docs that explain how to use this newer version. (are there docs somewhere?) the only thing i skipped was the scriptlets that come with the rpm packages but there's only one for the website package: postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /usr/bin/perl -e 'use Publican::WebSite; my $ws = Publican::WebSite->new(); $ws->regen_all_toc();' since website is new to me, i have no idea what that's doing but i'm guessing i can always run it manually whenever i want before i start doing anything website-related, correct? in any event, the above simple steps were enough to at least get me to a running publican 1.99 executable on ubuntu 10.04. i am now ready to be chastised for what i did wrong. :-) rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From jmorgan at redhat.com Sun May 30 22:00:24 2010 From: jmorgan at redhat.com (Jared Morgan) Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 18:00:24 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] Help on Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: <28328720.16.1275256902651.JavaMail.jmorgan@dhcp-1-169.bne.redhat.com> Message-ID: <6882443.19.1275257010980.JavaMail.jmorgan@dhcp-1-169.bne.redhat.com> Hi Howard I'm not quite sure what Chinese fonts are recommended, so I have forwarded your email onto the publican-list. I remember a discussion about this recently, so I'm sure someone on that list will be able to help you. The list is a relatively low traffic list, primarily used for Publican discussion and viewing the bugs raised as enhancements for the tool chain. You may want to consider signing up for it through the Red Hat Post Office. Cheers Jared Morgan Content Author Red Hat Asia Pacific 1/193 North Quay BRISBANE QLD 4000 P: +61 7 3514 8242 M: +61 413 005 479 From: "Howard Gao" To: "Jared Morgan" Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 1:30:56 AM Subject: Help on Chinese fonts Hi Jared, I'm trying to build a Chinese HornetQ user manual in PDF format. Do you know if Redhat has some Chinese fonts that I can safely use without any copyright issue? Thanks, Howard -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rlerch at redhat.com Sun May 30 22:35:11 2010 From: rlerch at redhat.com (Ryan Lerch) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 08:35:11 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] issues building publican from source (publican-1.6 branch) Message-ID: <4C02E81F.5020903@redhat.com> Hi, I am having issues trying to build publican from source. After running "./Build local", i am getting an error telling me that the tarball cannot be found: """ error: File /publican/branches/publican-1.6/tmp/rpm/Publican-1.6.3.tar.gz: No such file or directory """ when i look in the "/publican/branches/publican-1.6/tmp/rpm/" directory, the following tarball is found: """ Publican-v1.6.3.tar.gz """ is the extra "v" being added by something that i need to change? (no doubt i am doing something silly here...) cheers in advance, ryanlerch From anross at redhat.com Sun May 30 23:14:56 2010 From: anross at redhat.com (Andrew Ross) Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 19:14:56 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] issues building publican from source (publican-1.6 branch) In-Reply-To: <936438618.2035161275260894851.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1717986749.2035181275261296513.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> ----- "Ryan Lerch" wrote: > Hi, > > I am having issues trying to build publican from source. After running > > "./Build local", i am getting an error telling me that the tarball > cannot be found: > > """ > error: File > /publican/branches/publican-1.6/tmp/rpm/Publican-1.6.3.tar.gz: > No > such file or directory > """ > > when i look in the "/publican/branches/publican-1.6/tmp/rpm/" > directory, the following tarball is found: > > """ > Publican-v1.6.3.tar.gz > """ > > is the extra "v" being added by something that i need to change? (no > doubt i am doing something silly here...) > Same here. perl Build.PL returns [...] version 'v1.6.3' > cheers in advance, > ryanlerch > > _______________________________________________ > publican-list mailing list > publican-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican -- Andrew Ross Associate Quality Engineer Red Hat Asia Pacific Phone: 3514 8331 E-mail: anross at redhat.com "Commander Cody, the time has come. Execute Order 66." - Darth Sidious Ep.III From misty at redhat.com Sun May 30 23:47:28 2010 From: misty at redhat.com (Misty Stanley-Jones) Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 19:47:28 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] is publican-1.99 available to play with under ubuntu? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1428060941.84261275263248388.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> ----- "Robert P. J. Day" wrote: > taking a stab at installing 1.99 on my ubuntu 10.04 box, the > following *seems* to have done it but i'm willing to be corrected -- > i'm still new at ubuntu. Hi Robert, If you can verify that this worked for you, I think it would be very helpful for you to write up a guide that other people can use. Thanks for all of the time you have put into it so far! Thanks, Misty > > i grabbed the two noarch rpms from here: > > http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/publican/ > > used "alien" to simple-mindedly convert them to .deb files, installed > them and a few tests of running "publican --help" convinced me to: > > 1) export PERL5LIB=/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 > > and > > 2) install the ubuntu packages > > * libarchive_zip_perl > * libdbi_perl > * libtemplate_perl > > at which point i can at least run "publican --help" and have it work. > beyond that, i haven't done any testing so i have no idea what else > will fail as i look for the docs that explain how to use this newer > version. (are there docs somewhere?) > > the only thing i skipped was the scriptlets that come with the rpm > packages but there's only one for the website package: > > postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): > /usr/bin/perl -e 'use Publican::WebSite; my $ws = > Publican::WebSite->new(); $ws->regen_all_toc();' > > since website is new to me, i have no idea what that's doing but > i'm > guessing i can always run it manually whenever i want before i start > doing anything website-related, correct? > > in any event, the above simple steps were enough to at least get me > to a running publican 1.99 executable on ubuntu 10.04. i am now > ready > to be chastised for what i did wrong. :-) > > rday > > -- > > ======================================================================== > Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, > CANADA > > Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. > > Web page: > http://crashcourse.ca > Twitter: > http://twitter.com/rpjday > ======================================================================== > > _______________________________________________ > publican-list mailing list > publican-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican -- Misty Stanley-Jones Content Author, ECS 1/193 North Quay, Brisbane QLD 4000 Ph: +61 7 3514 8105 Mobile: +61 429 595 932 Time Zone: GMT+10 From jfearn at redhat.com Mon May 31 00:05:46 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 10:05:46 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] issues building publican from source (publican-1.6 branch) In-Reply-To: <4C02E81F.5020903@redhat.com> References: <4C02E81F.5020903@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1275264346.2533.20.camel@localhost> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 08:35 +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote: > Hi, > > I am having issues trying to build publican from source. After running > "./Build local", i am getting an error telling me that the tarball > cannot be found: > > """ > error: File > /publican/branches/publican-1.6/tmp/rpm/Publican-1.6.3.tar.gz: No > such file or directory > """ > > when i look in the "/publican/branches/publican-1.6/tmp/rpm/" > directory, the following tarball is found: > > """ > Publican-v1.6.3.tar.gz > """ > > is the extra "v" being added by something that i need to change? (no > doubt i am doing something silly here...) I'm on F12 and this doesn't happen for me. Did you run 'svn status' to see if you have any local changes? Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Mon May 31 00:11:45 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 20:11:45 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] is publican-1.99 available to play with under ubuntu? In-Reply-To: <1428060941.84261275263248388.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <1428060941.84261275263248388.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: On Sun, 30 May 2010, Misty Stanley-Jones wrote: > > ----- "Robert P. J. Day" wrote: > > > taking a stab at installing 1.99 on my ubuntu 10.04 box, the > > following *seems* to have done it but i'm willing to be corrected -- > > i'm still new at ubuntu. > > Hi Robert, > > If you can verify that this worked for you, I think it would be very > helpful for you to write up a guide that other people can use. > Thanks for all of the time you have put into it so far! > > Thanks, > Misty i hear. and obey. should be up on my wiki tomorrow. steal what you want. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From anross at redhat.com Mon May 31 00:16:00 2010 From: anross at redhat.com (Andrew Ross) Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 20:16:00 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] issues building publican from source (publican-1.6 branch) In-Reply-To: <1275264346.2533.20.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <199376126.2036271275264960754.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> ----- "Jeff Fearn" wrote: > I'm on F12 and this doesn't happen for me. > > Did you run 'svn status' to see if you have any local changes? > F13 svn status ? META.yml ? Publican-v1.6.3.tar.gz ? _build ? Build ? tmp and also ls ./tmp/rpm/ Publican-v1.6.3.tar.gz From jfearn at redhat.com Mon May 31 00:19:40 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 10:19:40 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] is publican-1.99 available to play with under ubuntu? In-Reply-To: References: <1E29B955-06EF-4681-BCA7-1B62498713BA@teambla.com> Message-ID: <1275265180.2533.33.camel@localhost> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 04:16 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2010, Bram Vogelaar wrote: > > > i havent found any .debs yet but if you managed to install the 1.6.3 > > version (and xml- and html- treebuilder .debs) from the debian > > repository its a breeze to install from svn trunk. > > > > cd /path/to/svn/checkouts > > svn co http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/publican > > cd publican/trunk/publican > > perl Build.Pl > > install missing dependecies (6 -ish ) via your favorite package manager. (synaptic package manager => search for perl and then select correct ones) > > ./Build > > ./Build test > > sudo ./Build install > > > > and then "Hup Hup Hup, Barbatruc" your done > > > > have fun with it, the new website feature is awesome > > taking a stab at installing 1.99 on my ubuntu 10.04 box, the > following *seems* to have done it but i'm willing to be corrected -- > i'm still new at ubuntu. > > i grabbed the two noarch rpms from here: IMHO you'd be much better off following Bram's instructions, much less likely to have idiosyncratic behavior. > http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/publican/ > > used "alien" to simple-mindedly convert them to .deb files, installed > them and a few tests of running "publican --help" convinced me to: > > 1) export PERL5LIB=/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 > > and > > 2) install the ubuntu packages > > * libarchive_zip_perl > * libdbi_perl > * libtemplate_perl > > at which point i can at least run "publican --help" and have it work. > beyond that, i haven't done any testing so i have no idea what else > will fail as i look for the docs that explain how to use this newer > version. (are there docs somewhere?) > > the only thing i skipped was the scriptlets that come with the rpm > packages but there's only one for the website package: > > postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): > /usr/bin/perl -e 'use Publican::WebSite; my $ws = Publican::WebSite->new(); $ws->regen_all_toc();' This is how it worked before I integrated the web site code in to publican, haven't got around to looking at the spec file stuff yet, you can run: $ publican update_site --site_config Note that I'm still debating whether or not to have all site management stuff in a separate command, so you don't need the full publican tree installed on your web server, ... but I'm not sure :) > since website is new to me, i have no idea what that's doing but i'm > guessing i can always run it manually whenever i want before i start > doing anything website-related, correct? > > in any event, the above simple steps were enough to at least get me > to a running publican 1.99 executable on ubuntu 10.04. i am now ready > to be chastised for what i did wrong. :-) Anyway that gets you to your goal is a right way! It might actually be worth getting the Debain build files, it should be a small change to update the source file used, that way you could have deb files to pop-up on a website like Rudi has done with the RPMs. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From jfearn at redhat.com Mon May 31 00:25:05 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 10:25:05 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Help on Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: <6882443.19.1275257010980.JavaMail.jmorgan@dhcp-1-169.bne.redhat.com> References: <6882443.19.1275257010980.JavaMail.jmorgan@dhcp-1-169.bne.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1275265505.2533.38.camel@localhost> On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 18:00 -0400, Jared Morgan wrote: > Hi Howard > > I'm not quite sure what Chinese fonts are recommended, so I have > forwarded your email onto the publican-list. I remember a discussion > about this recently, so I'm sure someone on that list will be able to > help you. I'm pretty sure everyone is using http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/CJKUnifonts it's certainly what Red Hat and Fedora distros are using. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From jfearn at redhat.com Mon May 31 00:30:07 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 10:30:07 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] issues building publican from source (publican-1.6 branch) In-Reply-To: <199376126.2036271275264960754.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <199376126.2036271275264960754.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1275265807.2533.40.camel@localhost> On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 20:16 -0400, Andrew Ross wrote: > ----- "Jeff Fearn" wrote: > > > > I'm on F12 and this doesn't happen for me. > > > > Did you run 'svn status' to see if you have any local changes? > > > > F13 > > svn status > ? META.yml > ? Publican-v1.6.3.tar.gz > ? _build > ? Build > ? tmp > > and also > > ls ./tmp/rpm/ > Publican-v1.6.3.tar.gz > Maybe a package changed ... can you try the following patch? $ svn diff -x -u lib/Publican.pm Index: lib/Publican.pm =================================================================== --- lib/Publican.pm (revision 1282) +++ lib/Publican.pm (working copy) @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ use strict; use Carp; -use version; use Config::Simple; use XML::TreeBuilder; use I18N::LangTags::List; @@ -17,7 +16,7 @@ use vars qw(@ISA $VERSION @EXPORT @EXPORT_OK $SINGLETON $LOCALISE); -$VERSION = version->new('1.6.3'); +$VERSION = '1.6.3'; @ISA = qw(Exporter AutoLoader); @EXPORT From anross at redhat.com Mon May 31 00:46:36 2010 From: anross at redhat.com (Andrew Ross) Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 20:46:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] issues building publican from source (publican-1.6 branch) In-Reply-To: <1587084354.2036891275266610605.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1955011099.2037001275266796449.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> ----- "Jeff Fearn" wrote: > > Maybe a package changed ... can you try the following patch? > > > $ svn diff -x -u lib/Publican.pm > Index: lib/Publican.pm > =================================================================== > --- lib/Publican.pm (revision 1282) > +++ lib/Publican.pm (working copy) > @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ > use strict; > > use Carp; > -use version; > use Config::Simple; > use XML::TreeBuilder; > use I18N::LangTags::List; > @@ -17,7 +16,7 @@ > > use vars qw(@ISA $VERSION @EXPORT @EXPORT_OK $SINGLETON $LOCALISE); > > -$VERSION = version->new('1.6.3'); > +$VERSION = '1.6.3'; > @ISA = qw(Exporter AutoLoader); > > @EXPORT > > Hmmm no luck :-/ [anross at glamdring publican-1.6]$ ./Build clean Deleting META.yml Deleting tmp Deleting Publican-v1.6.3.tar.gz [anross at glamdring publican-1.6]$ ./Build local Creating META.yml Creating Publican-v1.6.3 Creating Publican-v1.6.3.tar.gz Deleting Publican-v1.6.3 [...] /publican/branches/publican-1.6/tmp/rpm/Publican-1.6.3.tar.gz: No such file or directory -- Andrew Ross Associate Quality Engineer Red Hat Asia Pacific Phone: 3514 8331 E-mail: anross at redhat.com "Commander Cody, the time has come. Execute Order 66." - Darth Sidious Ep.III From jfearn at redhat.com Mon May 31 01:04:24 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 11:04:24 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] issues building publican from source (publican-1.6 branch) In-Reply-To: <1955011099.2037001275266796449.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <1955011099.2037001275266796449.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1275267864.2533.48.camel@localhost> On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 20:46 -0400, Andrew Ross wrote: > ----- "Jeff Fearn" wrote: > > > > > Maybe a package changed ... can you try the following patch? > > > > > > $ svn diff -x -u lib/Publican.pm > > Index: lib/Publican.pm > > =================================================================== > > --- lib/Publican.pm (revision 1282) > > +++ lib/Publican.pm (working copy) > > @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ > > use strict; > > > > use Carp; > > -use version; > > use Config::Simple; > > use XML::TreeBuilder; > > use I18N::LangTags::List; > > @@ -17,7 +16,7 @@ > > > > use vars qw(@ISA $VERSION @EXPORT @EXPORT_OK $SINGLETON $LOCALISE); > > > > -$VERSION = version->new('1.6.3'); > > +$VERSION = '1.6.3'; > > @ISA = qw(Exporter AutoLoader); > > > > @EXPORT > > > > > > Hmmm no luck :-/ > > [anross at glamdring publican-1.6]$ ./Build clean > Deleting META.yml > Deleting tmp > Deleting Publican-v1.6.3.tar.gz You need to run './Build realclean' then 'perl Build.PL' to get ./Build updated. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 31 02:11:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 22:11:20 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 596257] RFE: do not split admonitions across pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201005310211.o4V2BKrl032586@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596257 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_DEV --- Comment #3 from Jeff Fearn 2010-05-30 22:11:19 EDT --- Well no one disagreed, so that means everyone agreed! Fixed in Build: 1.6.3-0.t93 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Mon May 31 02:58:49 2010 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 12:58:49 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] issues building publican from source (publican-1.6 branch) In-Reply-To: <1275267864.2533.48.camel@localhost> References: <1955011099.2037001275266796449.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <1275267864.2533.48.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <1275274729.2533.55.camel@localhost> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 11:04 +1000, Jeff Fearn wrote: > On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 20:46 -0400, Andrew Ross wrote: > > ----- "Jeff Fearn" wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe a package changed ... can you try the following patch? I think there was a change n the way Module::Build was handling tuples, checked in a fix. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Software Engineer Engineering Operations Red Hat, Inc Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY Sure our competitors can rebuild the source but can they engage the customer the same way? -wmealing From rlerch at redhat.com Mon May 31 03:13:45 2010 From: rlerch at redhat.com (Ryan Lerch) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:13:45 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] issues building publican from source (publican-1.6 branch) In-Reply-To: <1275274729.2533.55.camel@localhost> References: <1955011099.2037001275266796449.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <1275267864.2533.48.camel@localhost> <1275274729.2533.55.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <4C032969.7020900@redhat.com> On 05/31/2010 12:58 PM, Jeff Fearn wrote: > I think there was a change n the way Module::Build was handling tuples, > checked in a fix. > > Cheers, Jeff. > Fantastic. worked no probs. Cheers, and thanks for the help, ryanlech From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Mon May 31 08:59:29 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 04:59:29 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] is publican-1.99 available to play with under ubuntu? In-Reply-To: <1275265180.2533.33.camel@localhost> References: <1E29B955-06EF-4681-BCA7-1B62498713BA@teambla.com> <1275265180.2533.33.camel@localhost> Message-ID: On Mon, 31 May 2010, Jeff Fearn wrote: > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 04:16 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Fri, 28 May 2010, Bram Vogelaar wrote: > > > > > i havent found any .debs yet but if you managed to install the > > > 1.6.3 version (and xml- and html- treebuilder .debs) from the > > > debian repository its a breeze to install from svn trunk. > > > > > > cd /path/to/svn/checkouts > > > svn co http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/publican > > > cd publican/trunk/publican > > > perl Build.Pl > > > install missing dependecies (6 -ish ) via your favorite package manager. (synaptic package manager => search for perl and then select correct ones) > > > ./Build > > > ./Build test > > > sudo ./Build install > > > > > > and then "Hup Hup Hup, Barbatruc" your done > > > > > > have fun with it, the new website feature is awesome > > > > taking a stab at installing 1.99 on my ubuntu 10.04 box, the > > following *seems* to have done it but i'm willing to be corrected > > -- i'm still new at ubuntu. > > > > i grabbed the two noarch rpms from here: > > IMHO you'd be much better off following Bram's instructions, much > less likely to have idiosyncratic behavior. your point is well taken, so i did the svn checkout. first point -- i'm pretty sure one need not check out the *entire* svn repo, correct? i mean, i need only the trunk if i'm working with the development stream, correct? no sense checking out unnecessary content. did the "perl Build.PL" and kept track of the perl packages that it asked for one after another, might as well save that list for next time. and, finally, after about a dozen installed perl packages: ===== $ perl Build.PL Deleting _build Creating custom builder _build/lib/My/Builder.pm in _build/lib/My Checking whether your kit is complete... WARNING: the following files are missing in your kit: META.yml Please inform the author. Checking prerequisites... - ERROR: Test::Perl::Critic is not installed - ERROR: Test::Pod::Coverage is not installed - ERROR: Test::Exception is not installed - ERROR: DBD::SQLite is not installed - ERROR: Devel::Cover is not installed - ERROR: Test::Pod is not installed - ERROR: DBD::SQLite is not installed ERRORS/WARNINGS FOUND IN PREREQUISITES. You may wish to install the versions of the modules indicated above before proceeding with this installation Deleting Build Removed previous script 'Build' Creating new 'Build' script for 'Publican' version '1.99' ===== obviously, i can handle the latter dependencies but what's with that META.yml diagnostic? my fault? in any event, if you want me to test, let me know, the machine has lots of cycles to spare. rday p.s. where's the publican-website stuff? will a successful build create that as well? sorry if this is all massively off-topic. -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Mon May 31 09:29:16 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 05:29:16 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] is publican-1.99 available to play with under ubuntu? In-Reply-To: <1428060941.84261275263248388.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <1428060941.84261275263248388.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: On Sun, 30 May 2010, Misty Stanley-Jones wrote: > > ----- "Robert P. J. Day" wrote: > > > taking a stab at installing 1.99 on my ubuntu 10.04 box, the > > following *seems* to have done it but i'm willing to be corrected -- > > i'm still new at ubuntu. > > Hi Robert, > > If you can verify that this worked for you, I think it would be very > helpful for you to write up a guide that other people can use. > Thanks for all of the time you have put into it so far! FWIW, as i have a tendency to wiki everything so i know where to find it later, i've dashed off what i've done here: http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Building_Publican_1.99_on_Ubuntu_10.04 i'm sure there's a much simpler way to do this, but it's at least an educational experience for me as i'm a long-time fedora person but new to ubuntu so a lot of my issues involve me just getting used to the ubuntu way of doing things. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Mon May 31 10:08:13 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 06:08:13 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] 1.99: translation(?) to SA drops end tag Message-ID: ok, i'm not sure what the deal is here. here's the original XML file datadir/Common_Content/common/en-US/Conventions.xml: ... In PDF and paper editions, this manual uses typefaces drawn from the Liberation Fonts set. ... and here's the cause of a ./Build error in file datadir/Common_Content/common/tmp/ar-SA/xml_tmp/Conventions.xml: ... In PDF and paper editions, this manual uses typefaces drawn from the Liberation Fonts set. ... is there a reason that end tag has disappeared? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Mon May 31 10:42:52 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 06:42:52 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] [PATCH] Correct misspellings of "deafult" to "default." Message-ID: Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day is this the proper strategy for submitting patches to the svn code base? or do i send them elsewhere? Index: bin/publican =================================================================== --- bin/publican (revision 1287) +++ bin/publican (working copy) @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ 'quiet' => maketext('Disable all logging.'), ## WebSite options 'db_file=s' => maketext('Override default database file.'), - 'toc_path=s' => maketext('Override the deafult TOC path.'), + 'toc_path=s' => maketext('Override the default TOC path.'), 'tmpl_path=s' => maketext('Override the default template path.'), 'site_config=s' => maketext('WebSite configuration file to use or create.'), @@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ Options: --site_config= WebSite configuration file to use or create. --db_file= Override default database file. - --toc_path= Override the deafult TOC path. + --toc_path= Override the default TOC path. --tmpl_path= Override the default template path. Index: po/publican.pot =================================================================== --- po/publican.pot (revision 1287) +++ po/publican.pot (working copy) @@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ msgstr "" #: bin/publican:142 -msgid "Override the deafult TOC path." +msgid "Override the default TOC path." msgstr "" #: lib/Publican.pm:286 -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== From rpjday at crashcourse.ca Mon May 31 11:18:42 2010 From: rpjday at crashcourse.ca (Robert P. J. Day) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 07:18:42 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] [PATCH] Fix a number of simple typoes in README file. Message-ID: Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day --- Index: README =================================================================== --- README (revision 1287) +++ README (working copy) @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Assumptions: DocBook xml, *nix, en-US source language. -Q: What actions are their? +Q: What actions are there? A: publican --help @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Q: How do I update all po files? -A: publican update_po --lANGS=ALLall +A: publican update_po --langs=all Q: What Book specific options can I use? @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ ./Build rpm Debian - The publican package deb files are in the debain package repo + The publican package deb files are in the debian package repo http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=publican cd publican TODO: deps @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ TODO: detail building xml2 -TODO: Complete deatils on building required LibXML and LibXSLT modules +TODO: Complete details on building required LibXML and LibXSLT modules vcvars32.bat -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ========================================================================