[publican-list] Code Samples highlighting colours
Ruediger Landmann
r.landmann at redhat.com
Mon Oct 18 03:22:31 UTC 2010
On 10/18/2010 01:04 PM, misty at redhat.com wrote:
> For accessibility, #ff00ff, #ffa500, #96b9ff need to go. #9b30ff is debatable.
>
Here's a tool that validates colours against the Web Content
Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0
http://www.snook.ca/technical/colour_contrast/colour.html
according to it, #9b30ff text on a #f5f5f5 background also fails one of
the four standards, so yeah, is probably not a good choice.
Cheers
Rudi
More information about the publican-list
mailing list