[publican-list] [Bug 631838] New: Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Sep 8 14:04:24 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than kdesdk

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631838

           Summary: Publican should depend on kdesdk-utils rather than
                    kdesdk
           Product: Fedora EPEL
           Version: el5
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: Reopened
          Severity: low
          Priority: low
         Component: publican
        AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: giallu at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: rdieter at math.unl.edu, stickster at gmail.com,
                    petersen at redhat.com, kms at passback.co.uk,
                    jfearn at redhat.com, mdehaan at redhat.com,
                    mmcallis at redhat.com, publican-list at redhat.com,
                    r.landmann at redhat.com
        Depends on: 432443,443024
    Classification: Fedora
          Clone Of: 443024


+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #443024 +++

The current publican SPEC file has a dependency on the kdesdk package for the
xml2pot and po2xml binaries.  This requires GNOME users to install the bulk of
the KDE system just to use Publican.  I have submitted a patch to create a
sub-package of kdesdk (443023).  The patch attached changes Publican to depend
on the new kdesdk-potools subpackage which means that GNOME user would only
need
Publican, this new sub-package, and QT, to create documentation.

--- Additional comment from kms at passback.co.uk on 2008-04-18 04:32:03 EDT ---

Created attachment 302851
Patch to SPEC file to depend on kdesdk-potools rather than kdesdk

--- Additional comment from rdieter at math.unl.edu on 2008-04-18 08:20:15 EDT ---

In the meantime, instead of using
Requires: kdesdk
Consider using
Requires: %{_bindir}/xml2pot %{_bindir}/po2xml
instead (asap).

This should ensure things continue to work before and after any split is done 
in kdesdk (which should be coming soon, hopefully).

--- Additional comment from jfearn at redhat.com on 2008-04-20 23:49:21 EDT ---

Changed requires and buildrequires to: %{_bindir}/xml2pot %{_bindir}/po2xml

--- Additional comment from petersen at redhat.com on 2008-06-24 23:31:07 EDT ---

I still see "Requires: kdesdk" in both devel and F-9.

It can be replaced by kdesdk-utils for both of them or the above if you prefer.

--- Additional comment from jfearn at redhat.com on 2008-06-24 23:42:40 EDT ---

0.34, where this bug has been fixed, is still being baked.

--- Additional comment from stickster at gmail.com on 2008-07-13 11:35:29 EDT ---

This can be fixed in the current (F-8, F-9, devel) package CVS -- it's just a
specfile change and a new build and push.  It doesn't need to hang on 0.34
being
ready.  I'm happy to do it, if that helps.

--- Additional comment from updates at fedoraproject.org on 2008-07-14 22:53:14
EDT ---

publican-0.33-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9

--- Additional comment from jfearn at redhat.com on 2008-07-14 23:20:24 EDT ---

Vote 1: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/pending/publican-0.33-1.fc9

Also built in devel and F8. However as kdesdk-utils is not available in F8 I
did
not push it as an update.

--- Additional comment from jfearn at redhat.com on 2008-07-15 18:20:52 EDT ---

*** Bug 455412 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Additional comment from updates at fedoraproject.org on 2008-07-17 10:16:41
EDT ---

publican-0.33-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the publican-list mailing list