[publican-list] Publican 3.0 -- with DocBook 5 or without ... WITH!

Joshua Wulf jwulf at redhat.com
Fri Dec 2 13:43:41 UTC 2011


Hi Jeff,

Is there any movement toward Docbook 5 support yet? I'm happy to help
out with testing.

I'd like to try integrating RDFa [1], which needs Docbook 5.

- Josh

[1] http://www.devx.com/semantic/Article/42543/1954

On 06/30/2011 06:12 PM, Jeff Fearn wrote:
> So almost everyone seems in favour of moving to DocBook 5!
> 
> Rudi has weakened my resolve with yummy cider, Bulmers, and I have 
> agreed to do a 2.6 release which will contain a selection of non 
> invasive fixes for bugs that are currently in the Modified, ON_QA, or 
> Verified states.
> 
> After that we'll concentrate on moving the common content and Users 
> Guide to DocBook 5, then rebuild the common brand from scratch based on 
> the nes DocBook XSL and CSS. Then it's test, test, test ... and maybe 
> some more cider!
> 
> Thanks for your input everybody :)
> 
> Cheers, Jeff.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> publican-list mailing list
> publican-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list
> Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican




More information about the publican-list mailing list