[publican-list] [Fwd: Re: r1722 - in trunk/publican-fedora: . .tx]

[Deon Lackey]

But this circles back to my original question: does that mean no more translation for publican? And does that have any effect on translation for Fedora? 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Fearn" <jfearn at redhat.com> 
To: "Jared Smith" <jaredsmith at jaredsmith.net> 
Cc: "Publican discussions" <publican-list at redhat.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:39:01 PM 
Subject: Re: [publican-list] [Fwd: Re: r1722 - in trunk/publican-fedora: . .tx] 

On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 20:35 -0500, Jared Smith wrote: 
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> wrote: 
> > In addition, even if they did host it against our will, none of it would 
> > be committed in to the Publican SVN repo. I'd move project hosting if 
> > this was not enforceable on fedora hosted. 
> 
> On a technical note, Transifex no longer pushes translations into 
> revision control, so it's completely up to developers/packagers to 
> decide whether or not (or when) to pull translated strings into their 
> software.  Just one of the many changes between 0.7 and 1.0. 

No, but it poorly enough designed that it needs configuration files in 
repos it only pulls from. 

At this point we most certainly will not be accepting content from 
transifex.net, nor will we be using or recommending their service; and 
we will take great umbrage should they use our name or content to 
advertising their service. 

Cheers, Jeff. 

_______________________________________________ 
publican-list mailing list 
publican-list at redhat.com 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list 
Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/publican-list/attachments/20110223/81868727/attachment.htm>