From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 4 23:28:40 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 19:28:40 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 671304] Increase appearance of book titles in ToC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109042328.p84NSeMj027903@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671304 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Lerch 2011-09-04 19:28:38 EDT --- Fixed in rev1882 -- 2011-09-02 15:04:51 +1000 (Fri, 02 Sep 2011) updated the common stylesheet to make the titles of books in a set to be more prominent. also removed the bottom border from all the links in the in-document TOCs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 4 23:28:48 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 19:28:48 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 671304] Increase appearance of book titles in ToC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109042328.p84NSmlN014636@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671304 Ryan Lerch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 00:36:06 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:36:06 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 735687] New: fop error when authorgroup contains only corpauthor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fop error when authorgroup contains only corpauthor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735687 Summary: fop error when authorgroup contains only corpauthor Product: Publican Version: future Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: lbailey at redhat.com QAContact: rlandman at redhat.com CC: mmcallis at redhat.com, publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Other Story Points: --- Type: --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 00:38:33 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:38:33 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 735688] New: publican build fails on unrelated rpmlint error Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: publican build fails on unrelated rpmlint error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735688 Summary: publican build fails on unrelated rpmlint error Product: Publican Version: future Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: abeekhof at redhat.com QAContact: rlandman at redhat.com CC: mmcallis at redhat.com, publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Other Story Points: --- Type: --- Description of problem: When building Pacemaker in mock, we also use publican to build our in-tree documentation. $(PUBLICAN) build --publish --langs=$(DOCBOOK_LANGS) --formats=$(DOCBOOK_FORMATS) However because the mock env variables are set publican thinks it should check the SRPM - not realising it is the Pacemaker SRPM and not one generated by 'publican package'. # Try to catch SRPMS created using outdated versions of publican in brew/koji if ( ( $ENV{RPM_BUILD_DIR} ) && ( $ENV{RPM_BUILD_DIR} ne "" ) && ( $ENV{RPM_PACKAGE_NAME} ne "publican" ) && (-f "/builddir/build/SRPMS/$ENV{RPM_PACKAGE_NAME}-$ENV{RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION}-$ENV{RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE}.src.rpm" ) ) In Pacemaker's case, there are some unavoidable rpmlint errors which triggers the following abort: # sad we need to do this kind of thing if ( system( "rpmlint", "-f", "/usr/share/publican/rpmlint.cfg", "-i", $pkg ) != 0 ) { croak( "\n\nERROR: Package failed rpmlint validation. Fix errors and retry." ); } Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Name : publican Version : 2.6 Release : 3.fc15 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 00:49:19 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:49:19 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 735688] publican build fails on unrelated rpmlint error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109050049.p850nJnK031605@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735688 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(abeekhof at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-04 20:49:18 EDT --- Please include the actual error being generated. It's not possible to know if the SRPM being compiled was generated by publican, so we need to look at what error is being generated and if we can work around it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 02:21:35 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:21:35 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 735688] publican build fails on unrelated rpmlint error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109050221.p852LZTl020339@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735688 Andrew Beekhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(abeekhof at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Andrew Beekhof 2011-09-04 22:21:33 EDT --- Surely you don't want to know about every rpmlint complaint for every project that uses publican for their docs. Why not have a switch to explicitly enable or disable that check? That way the 'publican package' spec template could have it on and everyone else can have it off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 02:48:07 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:48:07 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 735688] publican build fails on unrelated rpmlint error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109050248.p852m74s026882@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735688 --- Comment #3 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-04 22:48:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Surely you don't want to know about every rpmlint complaint for every project > that uses publican for their docs. I'm not weakening our own protection without a very good reason; and when we weaken things it will be targeted at verified issues. > Why not have a switch to explicitly enable or disable that check? Because the people who require checks the most will use the switch. > That way the 'publican package' spec template could have it on and everyone > else can have it off. This isn't reliable for us, it would mean anyone who can use a text editor can disable the check, this would defeat the whole purpose of having it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 03:12:21 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:12:21 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 734290] Escape characters included in translated titles of books in site tables of contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109050312.p853CLfu032133@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734290 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-04 23:12:20 EDT --- Spec file now uses double quote instead of single quote, so changed which quote gets escaped in spec file. Changed in branches/publican-2x and trunk. Committed revision 1884. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 04:16:05 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:16:05 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 671304] Increase appearance of book titles in ToC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109050416.p854G5tH015471@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671304 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfearn at redhat.com Target Milestone|--- |2.7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 04:22:58 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:22:58 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 696834] Choose format icon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109050422.p854Mw99017106@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696834 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |rlerch at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 04:21:01 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:21:01 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 689613] Audit font paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109050421.p854L1AW028844@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689613 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2011-09-05 00:21:01 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-05 00:21:01 EDT --- FOP is going to die! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 04:25:46 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:25:46 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 715382] Add switch to enable TOC in appendix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109050425.p854PkRj018407@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715382 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |rlandman at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 04:27:43 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:27:43 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 727392] Request for better handling of spaces in file names. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109050427.p854Rh40030897@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727392 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED Target Milestone|--- |3.0 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-05 00:27:42 EDT --- This should be fixed in Trunk as grep and sed have been removed from the code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 04:30:51 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:30:51 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 720656] Entities ignored in filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109050430.p854Upka019510@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720656 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2011-09-05 00:30:49 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-05 00:30:49 EDT --- The data used for packaging does not use the XSL system and therefore can not use content that requires XSLT processing to calculate the content. This is a known limitation and will not be changing in the foreseeable future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 04:34:13 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:34:13 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 728561] Part headings wrong in HTML and/or PDF output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109050434.p854YDlN020193@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728561 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |rlandman at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 06:29:33 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 02:29:33 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 734290] Escape characters included in translated titles of books in site tables of contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109050629.p856TXwA015232@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734290 --- Comment #3 from Ruediger Landmann 2011-09-05 02:29:32 EDT --- Verified in publican-2.7-0.fc15.t39.noarch -- thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 03:56:50 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:56:50 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 727756] Watermarks no workie. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060356.p863uojc013200@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727756 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.7 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2011-09-05 23:56:49 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-05 23:56:49 EDT --- Publican 2.7 has been release and includes a fix for this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 03:56:43 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:56:43 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 731601] [RFE] No wait on --cvs builds. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060356.p863uh01013154@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731601 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.7 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2011-09-05 23:56:42 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-05 23:56:42 EDT --- Publican 2.7 has been release and includes a fix for this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 03:56:48 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:56:48 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 727739] Publican Eclipse output doesn't work In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060356.p863um1m013183@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727739 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.7 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2011-09-05 23:56:47 --- Comment #7 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-05 23:56:47 EDT --- Publican 2.7 has been release and includes a fix for this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 03:56:44 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:56:44 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 729826] RFE: drop hard-coded default for os_ver: In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060356.p863uiw5013160@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729826 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.7 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2011-09-05 23:56:44 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-05 23:56:44 EDT --- Publican 2.7 has been release and includes a fix for this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 03:56:49 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:56:49 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 671304] Increase appearance of book titles in ToC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060356.p863unHY013196@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671304 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.7 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2011-09-05 23:56:48 --- Comment #3 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-05 23:56:48 EDT --- Publican 2.7 has been release and includes a fix for this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 03:56:45 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:56:45 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 729824] RFE: relax conditions on the (software) version: parameter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060356.p863ujd5013166@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729824 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.7 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2011-09-05 23:56:45 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-05 23:56:45 EDT --- Publican 2.7 has been release and includes a fix for this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 03:56:51 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:56:51 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 732608] $xml_lang/icons/icons.svg file misplaced when packaging translated books In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060356.p863upX6013209@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732608 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.7 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2011-09-05 23:56:50 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-05 23:56:50 EDT --- Publican 2.7 has been release and includes a fix for this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 03:56:46 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:56:46 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 734290] Escape characters included in translated titles of books in site tables of contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060356.p863ukvL013174@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734290 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.7 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2011-09-05 23:56:46 --- Comment #4 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-05 23:56:46 EDT --- Publican 2.7 has been release and includes a fix for this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From r.landmann at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 04:44:50 2011 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:44:50 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican 2.7 is now available Message-ID: <4E65A542.8030102@redhat.com> Hi all; Publican 2.7 is now available. This release provides fixes for a relatively small number of bugs, and adds support for wkhmltopdf as an alternative to FOP as a PDF generation tool. The most visible and important changes include: * re-enabling the draft watermark that we lost in a recent release (BZ#727756) * make Eclipse help plugins load properly (BZ#727739) * fix problems connected with the way that book titles and product names were presented in website tables of contents (BZ#734290) * allow version numbers to include letters; "6-Beta" is now a valid product version (BZ#729824) As discussed in another thread, initial testing of wkhtmltopdf has proved extremely promising, and includes at least these benefits: * much, much greater speed and better use of system resources -- the difference from FOP is nothing short of astounding! * better support for languages written in scripts other than European alphabets * support for languages written right-to-left * greater visual congruity between the HTML and PDF versions of documents If you run Publican 2.7 on a system where wkhtmltopdf is available, Publican will use it to create PDFs. If wkhtmltopdf is not available, Publican falls back to FOP. We'd really appreciate any feedback from people who use this feature. Special thanks to Bec Newton, from Red Hat's Middleware documentation team, for her continued improvements to usage in the Users' Guide, and for writing the Release Notes. Cheers! Rudi From jfearn at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 04:54:47 2011 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:54:47 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican 2.7 is now available In-Reply-To: <4E65A542.8030102@redhat.com> References: <4E65A542.8030102@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4E65A797.1050903@redhat.com> On 09/06/2011 02:44 PM, Ruediger Landmann wrote: > If you run Publican 2.7 on a system where wkhtmltopdf is available, > Publican will use it to create PDFs. If wkhtmltopdf is not available, > Publican falls back to FOP. We'd really appreciate any feedback from > people who use this feature. Note that on RHEL/Fedora we have not change the Requires from FOP; automated systems, such as Koji, will still use FOP when building Publican generated RPMs. Note that we have not removed the logic added in BZ #655713 that disables PDFs being shipped in Indic, ar-SA, fa-IR, & he-IL language packages. Cheers, Jeff. -- "Reply All" why you shouldn't use it: http://www.emailreplies.com/#12replytoall From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 05:13:16 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:13:16 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 671304] Increase appearance of book titles in ToC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060513.p865DGlu000514@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671304 --- Comment #4 from Rebecca Newton 2011-09-06 01:13:15 EDT --- Just fyi, I just tested this and it looks beautiful. Thanks, guys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 05:27:57 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:27:57 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 673401] Distributed chapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060527.p865Rvq9004730@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673401 Rebecca Newton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2011-09-06 01:27:54 --- Comment #1 from Rebecca Newton 2011-09-06 01:27:54 EDT --- I opened this bug and have, in the meantime either made the changes to the UG or forgotten what I was complaining about, so I'm going to close it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 05:53:08 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:53:08 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 735688] publican build fails on unrelated rpmlint error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060553.p865r8xl025547@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735688 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Beekhof 2011-09-06 01:53:07 EDT --- > Because the people who require checks the most will use the switch. Which would make any breakage their responsibility wouldn't it? People can always find a way to stupid stuff. The point I would make, is that making life difficult for everyone else isn't going to help the project much. Anyway, errors follow: # make mock Tue Sep 6 15:19:50 EST 2011: Rebuilt pacemaker-1de2436.tar.bz2 Rebuilt pacemaker-fedora.spec Wrote: /mnt/Development/sources/pacemaker/devel/pacemaker-1.1.6-117.fedora.src.rpm mock --root=fedora-15-x86_64 --rebuild --resultdir=/mnt/Development/sources/pacemaker/devel/mock --no-cleanup-after /mnt/Development/sources/pacemaker/devel/*.src.rpm ERROR: Exception(/mnt/Development/sources/pacemaker/devel/pacemaker-1.1.6-117.fedora.src.rpm) Config(fedora-15-x86_64) 9 minutes 32 seconds ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/pacemaker.spec'] make: *** [mock-fedora-15-x86_64] Error 1 from build.log cd Pacemaker_Explained && /usr/bin/publican build --publish --langs=en-US --formats=html-desktop,txt ERROR: The version of publican used to create the SRPM is too old to use with this version of publican. Upgrade publican on your local machine to at least version 2.6 and try again. at /usr/bin/publican line 50 ERROR: The version of publican used to create the SRPM is too old to use with this version of publican. Upgrade publican on your local machine to at least version 2.6 and try again. at /usr/bin/publican line 50 gmake[1]: *** [Clusters_from_Scratch.txt] Error 255 gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gmake[1]: *** [Pacemaker_Explained.txt] Error 255 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/pacemaker-1de2436/doc' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eYQ1qC (%build) Which is annoying since publican didn't create the SRPM and the installed version is 2.6-3.fc15 which does satisfy the requirement. However, once I use a versioned BuildRequires for publican in pacemaker.spec, the error changes to the one I created the bug for: Tue Sep 6 15:37:22 EST 2011: Using existing tarball: pacemaker-1de2436.tar.bz2 Rebuilt pacemaker-fedora.spec Wrote: /mnt/Development/sources/pacemaker/devel/pacemaker-1.1.6-119.fedora.src.rpm mock --root=fedora-15-x86_64 --rebuild --resultdir=/mnt/Development/sources/pacemaker/devel/mock --no-cleanup-after /mnt/Development/sources/pacemaker/devel/*.src.rpm ERROR: Exception(/mnt/Development/sources/pacemaker/devel/pacemaker-1.1.6-119.fedora.src.rpm) Config(fedora-15-x86_64) 6 minutes 5 seconds ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output. from build.log ... cd Pacemaker_Explained && /usr/bin/publican build --publish --langs=en-US --formats=html-desktop,txt pacemaker.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_USpacemaker.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US A dictionary for the Enchant spell checking library is not available for the language given in the info message. Spell checking will proceed with rpmlint's built-in implementation for localized tags in this language. For better spell checking results in this language, install the appropriate dictionary that Enchant will use for this language, often for example hunspell-* or aspell-*.A dictionary for the Enchant spell checking library is not available for the language given in the info message. Spell checking will proceed with rpmlint's built-in implementation for localized tags in this language. For better spell checking results in this language, install the appropriate dictionary that Enchant will use for this language, often for example hunspell-* or aspell-*. pacemaker.src:355: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ocf A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. pacemaker.src:356: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d pacemaker.src:355: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ocf A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. pacemaker.src:357: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/pacemaker A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. pacemaker.src:356: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. pacemaker.src:357: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/pacemaker A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. pacemaker.src:439: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 439, tab: line 11) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. pacemaker.src:439: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 439, tab: line 11) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. pacemaker.src: W: invalid-url Source0: pacemaker-1de2436.tar.bz2pacemaker.src: W: invalid-url Source0: pacemaker-1de2436.tar.bz2 The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings. ERROR: Package failed rpmlint validation. Fix errors and retry. at /usr/bin/publican line 60 ERROR: Package failed rpmlint validation. Fix errors and retry. at /usr/bin/publican line 60 gmake[1]: *** [Clusters_from_Scratch.txt] Error 64 gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gmake[1]: *** [Pacemaker_Explained.txt] Error 64 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/pacemaker-1de2436/doc' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Note that it is impossible for me to change the location of /usr/lib/ocf and avoid the error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 06:31:55 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 02:31:55 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 655713] Publican should not ship PDFs for known broken languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060631.p866VtdC003443@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655713 --- Comment #16 from Peter Moulder 2011-09-06 02:31:54 EDT --- Created attachment 521580 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=521580 Add si-LK to the set of Indic languages (to be excluded from pdf generation). (Untested.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 06:29:53 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 02:29:53 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 655713] Publican should not ship PDFs for known broken languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060629.p866Tr5W002732@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655713 Peter Moulder changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter.moulder at monash.edu --- Comment #15 from Peter Moulder 2011-09-06 02:29:50 EDT --- (I was delaying sending this, but it looks like FOP will still be with us for a while.) Please add the Indic language si-LK to the list. From what I can see in the one or two si-LK pdfs I looked at from docs.redhat.org, FOP output for this language suffers both from the font fallback problem (lots of text simply missing) and from poor shaping (resulting in vowel marks disconnected from their consonant). It looks like publican/lib/publican/Builder.pm is the only file that's affected. I attach an untested patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 06:34:03 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 02:34:03 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 735688] publican build fails on unrelated rpmlint error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109060634.p866Y3ch003969@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735688 --- Comment #5 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-06 02:34:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > However, once I use a versioned BuildRequires for publican in pacemaker.spec, > the error changes to the one I created the bug for: > > pacemaker.src:355: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ocf > A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It > should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. > pacemaker.src:356: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d > > Note that it is impossible for me to change the location of /usr/lib/ocf and > avoid the error. Isn't this error just saying that you need to change the path in %files from /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d to %{_lib}/ocf/resource.d? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mylists at teambla.com Tue Sep 6 18:55:58 2011 From: mylists at teambla.com (Bram Vogelaar) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:55:58 +0200 Subject: [publican-list] publican 2.5 build problem Message-ID: one of our machines has started refusing to build new documentation. throwing error like the one below. [exec] Beginning work on en-US [exec] Starting html [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on /usr/share/publican/Common_Content/platform/xsl/html.xsl [exec] Writing index.html for article [exec] Finished html [exec] Starting html-single [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on /usr/share/publican/Common_Content/platform/xsl/html-single.xsl [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/html-single: No such file or directory [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/Builder.pm line 1025 [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/html-single/Common_Content: No such file or directory [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/Builder.pm line 1028 [exec] Finished html-single [exec] Starting pdf [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on /usr/share/publican/Common_Content/platform/xsl/pdf.xsl [exec] Making portrait pages on A4 paper (210mmx297mm) [exec] Finished pdf [exec] Starting epub [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on /usr/share/publican/xsl/epub.xsl [exec] Writing OEBPS/ar01s02.html for sect1 [exec] Writing OEBPS/index.html for article [exec] Writing OEBPS/toc.ncx [exec] Writing OEBPS/content.opf [exec] Writing META-INF/container.xml [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/epub: No such file or directory [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/Builder.pm line 965 [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/epub/OEBPS/Common_Content: No such file or directory [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/Builder.pm line 968 [exec] Can't open mimetype file: at /usr/bin/publican line 672 [exec] Result: 2 Our other build server has been install identically to this one but is still building properly does anyone now what is going on? bram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 23:05:50 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:05:50 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 736189] New: Publican should die with a useful message if directory creation fails Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Publican should die with a useful message if directory creation fails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736189 Summary: Publican should die with a useful message if directory creation fails Product: Publican Version: 2.7 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: publican AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com ReportedBy: jfearn at redhat.com QAContact: rlandman at redhat.com CC: mmcallis at redhat.com, publican-list at redhat.com Classification: Other Story Points: --- Type: --- Description of problem: Every time Publican creates a directory it should check for success and croak with a useful message if it fails. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): publican-2.7 How reproducible: Easy Steps to Reproduce: 1. cd to a book as a normal user 2. create tmp dir 3. chown root:root tmp 4: run publican build Actual results: Weird errors Expected results: "Can't create directory $dir $why" Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 23:09:33 2011 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:09:33 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] publican 2.5 build problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E66A82D.6050205@redhat.com> On 09/07/2011 04:55 AM, Bram Vogelaar wrote: > one of our machines has started refusing to build new documentation. > throwing error like the one below. > > [exec] Beginning work on en-US > [exec] Starting html > [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on > /usr/share/publican/Common_Content/platform/xsl/html.xsl > [exec] Writing index.html for article > [exec] Finished html > [exec] Starting html-single > [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on > /usr/share/publican/Common_Content/platform/xsl/html-single.xsl > [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/html-single: No such file or directory > [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/Builder.pm line 1025 > [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/html-single/Common_Content: No such > file or directory > [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/Builder.pm line 1028 > [exec] Finished html-single > [exec] Starting pdf > [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on > /usr/share/publican/Common_Content/platform/xsl/pdf.xsl > [exec] Making portrait pages on A4 paper (210mmx297mm) > [exec] Finished pdf > [exec] Starting epub > [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on /usr/share/publican/xsl/epub.xsl > [exec] Writing OEBPS/ar01s02.html for sect1 > [exec] Writing OEBPS/index.html for article > [exec] Writing OEBPS/toc.ncx > [exec] Writing OEBPS/content.opf > [exec] Writing META-INF/container.xml > [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/epub: No such file or directory > [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/Builder.pm line 965 > [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/epub/OEBPS/Common_Content: No such > file or directory > [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/Builder.pm line 968 > [exec] Can't open mimetype file: at /usr/bin/publican line 672 > [exec] Result: 2 > > Our other build server has been install identically to this one but is > still building properly does anyone now what is going on? Hi Bram, I haven't seen this error before. At a guess I'd say it looks like a permissions or disk full issue. Given that HTML seems to work I'd lean towards the HTML build filling up disk space. Publican should be checking that the directory creation works before it tries running XSLT. I've created a bug to track this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736189 Cheers, Jeff. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 7 00:04:01 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:04:01 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 735688] publican build fails on unrelated rpmlint error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109070004.p8704173014486@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735688 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Beekhof 2011-09-06 20:04:00 EDT --- %{_lib} is "lib64" on 64-bit arches and the location would no longer conform to the OCF standard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 7 03:49:02 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:49:02 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 735688] publican build fails on unrelated rpmlint error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109070349.p873n2Ba025259@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735688 --- Comment #7 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-06 23:49:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > %{_lib} is "lib64" on 64-bit arches and the location would no longer conform to > the OCF standard. It's not valid to have 64 bit libraries on that path though, if you are only shipping 32 bit libs then you should be setting ExclusiveArch: Anyway, can you test a work around for me? Append the following line to /usr/share/publican/rpmlint.cfg setBadness('hardcoded-library-path', 0) and then run rpmlint -f /usr/share/publican/rpmlint.cfg $srpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From lamorarob at earthlink.net Thu Sep 8 09:00:33 2011 From: lamorarob at earthlink.net (Rob LaMora) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 05:00:33 -0400 (GMT-04:00) Subject: [publican-list] Help with Web Site and ToCs Message-ID: <4147682.1315472433911.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hybrid.atl.sa.earthlink.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mylists at teambla.com Thu Sep 8 16:40:12 2011 From: mylists at teambla.com (Bram Vogelaar) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:40:12 +0200 Subject: [publican-list] publican 2.5 build problem In-Reply-To: References: <4E66A82D.6050205@redhat.com> Message-ID: hello Jeff thanks for the guestimate, the disk is only full for 40% but seems to be on the fritz anywho. i have migrate old the code to a new server On 8 September 2011 18:39, Bram Vogelaar wrote: > hello Jeff > > thanks for the guestimate, the disk is only full for 40% but seems to be on > the fritz anywho. i have migrate old the code to a new server > > > On 7 September 2011 01:09, Jeff Fearn wrote: > >> On 09/07/2011 04:55 AM, Bram Vogelaar wrote: >> >>> one of our machines has started refusing to build new documentation. >>> throwing error like the one below. >>> >>> [exec] Beginning work on en-US >>> [exec] Starting html >>> [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on >>> /usr/share/publican/Common_**Content/platform/xsl/html.xsl >>> [exec] Writing index.html for article >>> [exec] Finished html >>> [exec] Starting html-single >>> [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on >>> /usr/share/publican/Common_**Content/platform/xsl/html-**single.xsl >>> [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/html-single: No such file or directory >>> [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/**Builder.pm line 1025 >>> [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/html-single/Common_**Content: No such >>> file or directory >>> [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/**Builder.pm line 1028 >>> [exec] Finished html-single >>> [exec] Starting pdf >>> [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on >>> /usr/share/publican/Common_**Content/platform/xsl/pdf.xsl >>> [exec] Making portrait pages on A4 paper (210mmx297mm) >>> [exec] Finished pdf >>> [exec] Starting epub >>> [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on /usr/share/publican/xsl/epub.**xsl >>> [exec] Writing OEBPS/ar01s02.html for sect1 >>> [exec] Writing OEBPS/index.html for article >>> [exec] Writing OEBPS/toc.ncx >>> [exec] Writing OEBPS/content.opf >>> [exec] Writing META-INF/container.xml >>> [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/epub: No such file or directory >>> [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/**Builder.pm line 965 >>> [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/epub/OEBPS/Common_**Content: No such >>> file or directory >>> [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/**Builder.pm line 968 >>> [exec] Can't open mimetype file: at /usr/bin/publican line 672 >>> [exec] Result: 2 >>> >>> Our other build server has been install identically to this one but is >>> still building properly does anyone now what is going on? >>> >> >> Hi Bram, I haven't seen this error before. At a guess I'd say it looks >> like a permissions or disk full issue. Given that HTML seems to work I'd >> lean towards the HTML build filling up disk space. >> >> Publican should be checking that the directory creation works before it >> tries running XSLT. I've created a bug to track this >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**show_bug.cgi?id=736189 >> >> Cheers, Jeff. >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> publican-list mailing list >> publican-list at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/**mailman/listinfo/publican-list >> Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/**publican >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From r.landmann at redhat.com Thu Sep 8 21:50:42 2011 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:50:42 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Help with Web Site and ToCs In-Reply-To: <4147682.1315472433911.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hybrid.atl.sa.earthlink.net> References: <4147682.1315472433911.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hybrid.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Message-ID: <4E6938B2.8040206@redhat.com> On 09/08/2011 07:00 PM, Rob LaMora wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to Publican and wanted to ask the experts about something I cannot > figure out. I would like to build a Publican-based Web site, complete with the > collapsible table of contents functionality but cannot seem to get anything > close to this. Hi Rob -- what version of Publican have you got there? This feature was added in version 2.4, and websites created with that version or newer should have this feature -- http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/en-US/Publican/2.4/html/Release_Notes/index.html Cheers Rudi From r.landmann at redhat.com Thu Sep 8 22:14:10 2011 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:14:10 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Help with Web Site and ToCs In-Reply-To: <4147682.1315472433911.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hybrid.atl.sa.earthlink.net> References: <4147682.1315472433911.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hybrid.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Message-ID: <4E693E32.4080901@redhat.com> On 09/08/2011 07:00 PM, Rob LaMora wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to Publican and wanted to ask the experts about something I cannot > figure out. I would like to build a Publican-based Web site, complete with the > collapsible table of contents functionality but cannot seem to get anything > close to this. Hi Rob -- what version of Publican have you got there? This feature was added in version 2.4, and websites created with that version or newer should have this feature -- http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/en-US/Publican/2.4/html/Release_Notes/index.html Cheers Rudi From jfearn at redhat.com Thu Sep 8 22:59:17 2011 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:59:17 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Bugzilla mail no longer sent to list Message-ID: <4E6948C5.4070002@redhat.com> FYI the bugzilla email will no longer be sent to the list. Apparently it scares people off ... o_O Cheers, Jeff. From lamorarob at earthlink.net Fri Sep 9 19:26:11 2011 From: lamorarob at earthlink.net (Rob LaMora) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:26:11 -0400 (GMT-04:00) Subject: [publican-list] Help with Web Site and ToCs Message-ID: <2078271.1315596371372.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Hi Rudi, Thanks for the message. I have installed and am running (Windows) version 2.3 (as indicated from the publican -v command). So would I need to use the Linux version to get this capability (version > 2.3)? Thanks again, Rob -----Original Message----- >From: publican-list-request at redhat.com >Sent: Sep 9, 2011 12:00 PM >To: publican-list at redhat.com >Subject: publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 8 > >Send publican-list mailing list submissions to > publican-list at redhat.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > publican-list-request at redhat.com > >You can reach the person managing the list at > publican-list-owner at redhat.com > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of publican-list digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: publican 2.5 build problem (Bram Vogelaar) > 2. Re: Help with Web Site and ToCs (Ruediger Landmann) > 3. Re: Help with Web Site and ToCs (Ruediger Landmann) > 4. Bugzilla mail no longer sent to list (Jeff Fearn) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:40:12 +0200 >From: Bram Vogelaar >To: Publican discussions >Subject: Re: [publican-list] publican 2.5 build problem >Message-ID: > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >hello Jeff > >thanks for the guestimate, the disk is only full for 40% but seems to be on >the fritz anywho. i have migrate old the code to a new server > >On 8 September 2011 18:39, Bram Vogelaar wrote: > >> hello Jeff >> >> thanks for the guestimate, the disk is only full for 40% but seems to be on >> the fritz anywho. i have migrate old the code to a new server >> >> >> On 7 September 2011 01:09, Jeff Fearn wrote: >> >>> On 09/07/2011 04:55 AM, Bram Vogelaar wrote: >>> >>>> one of our machines has started refusing to build new documentation. >>>> throwing error like the one below. >>>> >>>> [exec] Beginning work on en-US >>>> [exec] Starting html >>>> [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on >>>> /usr/share/publican/Common_**Content/platform/xsl/html.xsl >>>> [exec] Writing index.html for article >>>> [exec] Finished html >>>> [exec] Starting html-single >>>> [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on >>>> /usr/share/publican/Common_**Content/platform/xsl/html-**single.xsl >>>> [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/html-single: No such file or directory >>>> [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/**Builder.pm line 1025 >>>> [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/html-single/Common_**Content: No such >>>> file or directory >>>> [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/**Builder.pm line 1028 >>>> [exec] Finished html-single >>>> [exec] Starting pdf >>>> [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on >>>> /usr/share/publican/Common_**Content/platform/xsl/pdf.xsl >>>> [exec] Making portrait pages on A4 paper (210mmx297mm) >>>> [exec] Finished pdf >>>> [exec] Starting epub >>>> [exec] Using XML::LibXSLT on /usr/share/publican/xsl/epub.**xsl >>>> [exec] Writing OEBPS/ar01s02.html for sect1 >>>> [exec] Writing OEBPS/index.html for article >>>> [exec] Writing OEBPS/toc.ncx >>>> [exec] Writing OEBPS/content.opf >>>> [exec] Writing META-INF/container.xml >>>> [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/epub: No such file or directory >>>> [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/**Builder.pm line 965 >>>> [exec] Can't stat tmp/en-US/epub/OEBPS/Common_**Content: No such >>>> file or directory >>>> [exec] at /usr/share/perl5/Publican/**Builder.pm line 968 >>>> [exec] Can't open mimetype file: at /usr/bin/publican line 672 >>>> [exec] Result: 2 >>>> >>>> Our other build server has been install identically to this one but is >>>> still building properly does anyone now what is going on? >>>> >>> >>> Hi Bram, I haven't seen this error before. At a guess I'd say it looks >>> like a permissions or disk full issue. Given that HTML seems to work I'd >>> lean towards the HTML build filling up disk space. >>> >>> Publican should be checking that the directory creation works before it >>> tries running XSLT. I've created a bug to track this >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**show_bug.cgi?id=736189 >>> >>> Cheers, Jeff. >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> publican-list mailing list >>> publican-list at redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/**mailman/listinfo/publican-list >>> Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/**publican >>> >> >> >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:50:42 +1000 >From: Ruediger Landmann >To: publican-list at redhat.com >Subject: Re: [publican-list] Help with Web Site and ToCs >Message-ID: <4E6938B2.8040206 at redhat.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >On 09/08/2011 07:00 PM, Rob LaMora wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am new to Publican and wanted to ask the experts about something I cannot >> figure out. I would like to build a Publican-based Web site, complete with the >> collapsible table of contents functionality but cannot seem to get anything >> close to this. > >Hi Rob -- what version of Publican have you got there? This feature was >added in version 2.4, and websites created with that version or newer >should have this feature -- >http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/en-US/Publican/2.4/html/Release_Notes/index.html > >Cheers >Rudi > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:14:10 +1000 >From: Ruediger Landmann >To: publican-list at redhat.com >Subject: Re: [publican-list] Help with Web Site and ToCs >Message-ID: <4E693E32.4080901 at redhat.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >On 09/08/2011 07:00 PM, Rob LaMora wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am new to Publican and wanted to ask the experts about something I cannot >> figure out. I would like to build a Publican-based Web site, complete with the >> collapsible table of contents functionality but cannot seem to get anything >> close to this. > >Hi Rob -- what version of Publican have you got there? This feature was >added in version 2.4, and websites created with that version or newer >should have this feature -- >http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/en-US/Publican/2.4/html/Release_Notes/index.html > >Cheers >Rudi > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 4 >Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:59:17 +1000 >From: Jeff Fearn >To: Publican List >Subject: [publican-list] Bugzilla mail no longer sent to list >Message-ID: <4E6948C5.4070002 at redhat.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >FYI the bugzilla email will no longer be sent to the list. Apparently it >scares people off ... o_O > >Cheers, Jeff. > > > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >publican-list mailing list >publican-list at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > >End of publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 8 >******************************************** From jfearn at redhat.com Tue Sep 13 02:58:23 2011 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:58:23 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Help with Web Site and ToCs In-Reply-To: <2078271.1315596371372.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> References: <2078271.1315596371372.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Message-ID: <4E6EC6CF.2060806@redhat.com> On 09/10/2011 05:26 AM, Rob LaMora wrote: > Hi Rudi, > > Thanks for the message. I have installed and am running (Windows) version 2.3 (as indicated from the publican -v command). So would I need to use the Linux version to get this capability (version> 2.3)? Hi Rob ATM this is true. My Windows box ate it's hard drives, nasty mother board issue :(, and I haven't set up my dev environment on there since I got a new hard drive ... I blame GuildWars, it's too tempting to play it once I boot windows :D I'll endeavour to get it working again so I can update the Windows installer. Cheers, Jeff. -- "Reply All" why you shouldn't use it: http://www.emailreplies.com/#12replytoall From lamorarob at earthlink.net Wed Sep 14 06:41:21 2011 From: lamorarob at earthlink.net (Rob LaMora) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:41:21 -0400 (GMT-04:00) Subject: [publican-list] publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 10 Message-ID: <12831489.1315982481563.JavaMail.root@elwamui-ovcar.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Hi Jeff, I would greatly appreciate the updated Windows version! Rob -----Original Message----- >From: publican-list-request at redhat.com >Sent: Sep 13, 2011 12:00 PM >To: publican-list at redhat.com >Subject: publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 10 > >Send publican-list mailing list submissions to > publican-list at redhat.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > publican-list-request at redhat.com > >You can reach the person managing the list at > publican-list-owner at redhat.com > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of publican-list digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Help with Web Site and ToCs (Jeff Fearn) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:58:23 +1000 >From: Jeff Fearn >To: publican-list at redhat.com >Subject: Re: [publican-list] Help with Web Site and ToCs >Message-ID: <4E6EC6CF.2060806 at redhat.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >On 09/10/2011 05:26 AM, Rob LaMora wrote: >> Hi Rudi, >> >> Thanks for the message. I have installed and am running (Windows) version 2.3 (as indicated from the publican -v command). So would I need to use the Linux version to get this capability (version> 2.3)? > >Hi Rob ATM this is true. My Windows box ate it's hard drives, nasty >mother board issue :(, and I haven't set up my dev environment on there >since I got a new hard drive ... I blame GuildWars, it's too tempting to >play it once I boot windows :D > >I'll endeavour to get it working again so I can update the Windows >installer. > >Cheers, Jeff. > >-- >"Reply All" why you shouldn't use it: >http://www.emailreplies.com/#12replytoall > > > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >publican-list mailing list >publican-list at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > >End of publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 10 >********************************************* From bloodshed88 at gmail.com Thu Sep 15 13:52:09 2011 From: bloodshed88 at gmail.com (Eduardo Mondoni) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:52:09 -0300 Subject: [publican-list] Draft Image Message-ID: Hi, recently I tested the creation of a draft PDF, and it's OK. but, when I removed the draft mode, it still make the PDF with the draft background image. someone know if already have a bug ticket open for this or a solution?? thanks *-- Eduardo Mondoni Analista de Suporte RHCSA - RHCT - LPIC-1 Novell CLA - Novell DCTS* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sbonnevi at redhat.com Thu Sep 15 14:42:26 2011 From: sbonnevi at redhat.com (Steve Bonneville) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:42:26 -0500 Subject: [publican-list] Draft Image In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20110915144226.GB20257@sbonnevi.msp.redhat.com> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:52:09AM -0300, Eduardo Mondoni wrote: > Hi, > > recently I tested the creation of a draft PDF, > and it's OK. > > but, when I removed the draft mode, it still make the PDF with the draft > background image. > someone know if already have a bug ticket open for this or a solution?? My team was just observing this yesterday as well. The only way we could get draft mode turned off with Publican 2.7 was to adjust either my team's custom brand or line 49 of /usr/share/publican/xsl/defaults.xsl to set no Otherwise it looks like draft mode is stuck in the "on" position whether or not you've enabled it in the XML. (On the flip side, after doing this draft mode is stuck in the "off" position....) :) I don't think there's a bug filed on this yet, there probably should be. Publican 2.6 didn't exhibit the issue; this is something that came up once the draft watermark was fixed for 2.7, I think. -- Steve From bloodshed88 at gmail.com Thu Sep 15 14:52:11 2011 From: bloodshed88 at gmail.com (Eduardo Mondoni) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:52:11 -0300 Subject: [publican-list] Draft Image In-Reply-To: <20110915144226.GB20257@sbonnevi.msp.redhat.com> References: <20110915144226.GB20257@sbonnevi.msp.redhat.com> Message-ID: > > My team was just observing this yesterday as well. The only way we could > get draft mode turned off with Publican 2.7 was to adjust either my team's > custom brand or line 49 of /usr/share/publican/xsl/defaults.xsl to set > >> >> no > > I'll try this solution until next update :) I don't think there's a bug filed on this yet, there probably should be. > Publican 2.6 didn't exhibit the issue; this is something that came up > once the draft watermark was fixed for 2.7, I think. > Recently I upgraded to this version and fop version using the updates-testing repo too thanks *-- Eduardo Mondoni Analista de Suporte RHCSA - RHCT - LPIC-1 Novell CLA - Novell DCTS* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sgordon at redhat.com Wed Sep 21 02:15:03 2011 From: sgordon at redhat.com (Steve Gordon) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:15:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [publican-list] Draft Image In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <4a329bb1-fdea-4ee1-8edd-3e30325627c8@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> > Hi, > > recently I tested the creation of a draft PDF, > and it's OK. > > but, when I removed the draft mode, it still make the PDF with the > draft > background image. > someone know if already have a bug ticket open for this or a > solution?? Hi Eduardo, Thanks for reporting this issue, it has been filed as: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740123 It appears this issue affects the PDF builds but not other output formats, or at least html, html-single appear to be ok. Thanks, Steve From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 22 01:46:03 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:46:03 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 735688] publican build fails on unrelated rpmlint error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109220146.p8M1k3Z8027395@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735688 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Jeff Fearn 2011-09-21 21:46:02 EDT --- Removed rpmlint checks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jfearn at redhat.com Thu Sep 22 21:03:20 2011 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:03:20 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican 2.8 Released Message-ID: <4E7BA298.8020504@redhat.com> Hi, Publican 2.8 has been released, it contains a few fixes from 2.7. - Fix draft mode always on in PDF. BZ #740123 - Remove rpmlint checks. BZ #735688 - Fix Too late for -CA messages in tests. BZ #738161 New source tar ball at https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/u/publican/Publican-2.8.tar.gz Fedora builds have been done, please add a response to Bhodi if you are using them. Fedora 14: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-2.8-1.fc14?_csrf_token=75a9c78ececd887a0f16ed0b0b1e9afad0a9c5c8 Fedora 15: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F15?_csrf_token=75a9c78ececd887a0f16ed0b0b1e9afad0a9c5c8 Fedora 16: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F16?_csrf_token=75a9c78ececd887a0f16ed0b0b1e9afad0a9c5c8 Cheers, Jeff. -- "Reply All" why you shouldn't use it: http://www.emailreplies.com/#12replytoall From r.landmann at redhat.com Thu Sep 22 23:12:59 2011 From: r.landmann at redhat.com (Ruediger Landmann) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:12:59 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Publican 2.8 released Message-ID: <4E7BC0FB.40700@redhat.com> Hi all: Just a quick note on the very low-key release of Publican 2.8. Publican 2.7 fixed a bug[1] that prevented "Draft" watermarks appearing on documents built with the "draft" attribute. Unfortunately, the fix created a new bug[2] where the "Draft" watermark was visible on *all* PDF versions of documents, whether the "draft" attribute had been set or not! Because of the very high impact of the new bug, we've released Publican 2.8 to address it. At the same time, we removed a recent feature that enforced an rpmlint check when documents were built in a chroot environment like mock (or a build system the uses mock, like Koji or Brew). In practice, this caused more problems than it prevented, and based on the feedback we received from users, we thought it better to just drop it. A source tarball and RPM spec file are available on Fedorahosted,[3] and Publican 2.8 should be available in the Fedora repos shortly. Cheers Rudi [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727756 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740123 [3] https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/u/publican/ From lamorarob at earthlink.net Fri Sep 23 17:12:55 2011 From: lamorarob at earthlink.net (Rob LaMora) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:12:55 -0400 (GMT-04:00) Subject: [publican-list] publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 15 Message-ID: <31593778.1316797975517.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Sorry for the ignorance here, but how would I go about updating my Publican 2.7 installation to version 2.8 on my Fedora 15 client? I see the link to the source tarball, but I am not sure how to upgrade. Thanks, Rob -----Original Message----- >From: publican-list-request at redhat.com >Sent: Sep 23, 2011 12:00 PM >To: publican-list at redhat.com >Subject: publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 15 > >Send publican-list mailing list submissions to > publican-list at redhat.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > publican-list-request at redhat.com > >You can reach the person managing the list at > publican-list-owner at redhat.com > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of publican-list digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Publican 2.8 Released (Jeff Fearn) > 2. Publican 2.8 released (Ruediger Landmann) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:03:20 +1000 >From: Jeff Fearn >To: Publican List >Subject: [publican-list] Publican 2.8 Released >Message-ID: <4E7BA298.8020504 at redhat.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >Hi, Publican 2.8 has been released, it contains a few fixes from 2.7. > >- Fix draft mode always on in PDF. BZ #740123 >- Remove rpmlint checks. BZ #735688 >- Fix Too late for -CA messages in tests. BZ #738161 > >New source tar ball at >https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/u/publican/Publican-2.8.tar.gz > >Fedora builds have been done, please add a response to Bhodi if you are >using them. > >Fedora 14: >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-2.8-1.fc14?_csrf_token=75a9c78ececd887a0f16ed0b0b1e9afad0a9c5c8 > >Fedora 15: >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F15?_csrf_token=75a9c78ececd887a0f16ed0b0b1e9afad0a9c5c8 > >Fedora 16: >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F16?_csrf_token=75a9c78ececd887a0f16ed0b0b1e9afad0a9c5c8 > >Cheers, Jeff. > >-- >"Reply All" why you shouldn't use it: >http://www.emailreplies.com/#12replytoall > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:12:59 +1000 >From: Ruediger Landmann >To: Publican discussions >Subject: [publican-list] Publican 2.8 released >Message-ID: <4E7BC0FB.40700 at redhat.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >Hi all: > >Just a quick note on the very low-key release of Publican 2.8. > >Publican 2.7 fixed a bug[1] that prevented "Draft" watermarks appearing >on documents built with the "draft" attribute. Unfortunately, the fix >created a new bug[2] where the "Draft" watermark was visible on *all* >PDF versions of documents, whether the "draft" attribute had been set or >not! Because of the very high impact of the new bug, we've released >Publican 2.8 to address it. > >At the same time, we removed a recent feature that enforced an rpmlint >check when documents were built in a chroot environment like mock (or a >build system the uses mock, like Koji or Brew). In practice, this caused >more problems than it prevented, and based on the feedback we received >from users, we thought it better to just drop it. > >A source tarball and RPM spec file are available on Fedorahosted,[3] and >Publican 2.8 should be available in the Fedora repos shortly. > >Cheers >Rudi > > >[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727756 > >[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740123 > >[3] https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/u/publican/ > > > > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >publican-list mailing list >publican-list at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > >End of publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 15 >********************************************* From Norman at dunbar-it.co.uk Sat Sep 24 07:10:25 2011 From: Norman at dunbar-it.co.uk (Norman Dunbar) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:10:25 +0100 Subject: [publican-list] publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 15 In-Reply-To: <31593778.1316797975517.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net> References: <31593778.1316797975517.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Message-ID: <4E7D8261.5010300@dunbar-it.co.uk> Morning Rob, > Sorry for the ignorance here, but how would I go about updating my Publican 2.7 installation to version 2.8 on my Fedora 15 client? I see the link to the source tarball, but I am not sure how to upgrade. If there are no RPMs ready yet, download the tarball, extract it, then follow the instructions in README under "Q. How do I build publican from source". For Fedora it says: cd publican $ perl Build.PL if this complains about missing deps, on Fedora 10+, and RHEL 6, run $ yum-builddep publican $ ./Build rpm I'm not a Fedora user myself so good luck! Cheers, Norm. -- Norman Dunbar Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd Registered address: Thorpe House 61 Richardshaw Lane Pudsey West Yorkshire United Kingdom LS28 7EL Company Number: 05132767 From jfearn at redhat.com Sun Sep 25 23:33:09 2011 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:33:09 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 15 In-Reply-To: <31593778.1316797975517.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net> References: <31593778.1316797975517.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Message-ID: <4E7FBA35.2070402@redhat.com> On 09/24/2011 03:12 AM, Rob LaMora wrote: > Sorry for the ignorance here, but how would I go about updating my Publican 2.7 installation to version 2.8 on my Fedora 15 client? I see the link to the source tarball, but I am not sure how to upgrade. >> >> Fedora builds have been done, please add a response to Bhodi if you are >> using them. >> >> Fedora 15: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F15?_csrf_token=75a9c78ececd887a0f16ed0b0b1e9afad0a9c5c8 If a build is in Bhodi you should be able to install it by enabling the updates-testing repository. $ sudo yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing publican\* Then if you are happy with it you go to Bhodi and give it a tick so the build gets in to the updates repo. If you are unhappy with the new version you can easily downgrade to the previous version. $ sudo yum downgrade publican\* FWIW I think 2.8 is in the updates repo now. Cheers, Jeff. From lamorarob at earthlink.net Mon Sep 26 20:34:58 2011 From: lamorarob at earthlink.net (Rob LaMora) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:34:58 -0400 (GMT-04:00) Subject: [publican-list] publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 17 Message-ID: <8195445.1317069298891.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hybrid.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Thanks everyone... I was able to upgrade successfully on Fedora 15 from 2.7 to 2.8. Rob -----Original Message----- >From: publican-list-request at redhat.com >Sent: Sep 26, 2011 12:00 PM >To: publican-list at redhat.com >Subject: publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 17 > >Send publican-list mailing list submissions to > publican-list at redhat.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > publican-list-request at redhat.com > >You can reach the person managing the list at > publican-list-owner at redhat.com > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of publican-list digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 15 (Jeff Fearn) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:33:09 +1000 >From: Jeff Fearn >To: publican-list at redhat.com >Subject: Re: [publican-list] publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 15 >Message-ID: <4E7FBA35.2070402 at redhat.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >On 09/24/2011 03:12 AM, Rob LaMora wrote: >> Sorry for the ignorance here, but how would I go about updating my Publican 2.7 installation to version 2.8 on my Fedora 15 client? I see the link to the source tarball, but I am not sure how to upgrade. >>> >>> Fedora builds have been done, please add a response to Bhodi if you are >>> using them. >>> >>> Fedora 15: >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F15?_csrf_token=75a9c78ececd887a0f16ed0b0b1e9afad0a9c5c8 > >If a build is in Bhodi you should be able to install it by enabling the >updates-testing repository. > >$ sudo yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing publican\* > >Then if you are happy with it you go to Bhodi and give it a tick so the >build gets in to the updates repo. > >If you are unhappy with the new version you can easily downgrade to the >previous version. > >$ sudo yum downgrade publican\* > >FWIW I think 2.8 is in the updates repo now. > >Cheers, Jeff. > > > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >publican-list mailing list >publican-list at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list > >End of publican-list Digest, Vol 42, Issue 17 >********************************************* From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 26 23:54:50 2011 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:54:50 -0400 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 735688] publican build fails on unrelated rpmlint error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201109262354.p8QNsoK5030673@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735688 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.8 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2011-09-26 19:54:50 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.