From lists at murrell.ca Sun Sep 6 08:11:55 2015 From: lists at murrell.ca (Alan Murrell) Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 01:11:55 -0700 Subject: [publican-list] Non-product documentation Message-ID: <20150906011155.15801b0sjycfdzr4@10.215.1.9> Hi all, this question is for those who may currently use Publication for non-product-based technical documentation, for example, a document giving step-by-step instructions for adding a user to Office 365. In cases of that type of documentation, what do you enter as the "Product"? Is it possible to suppress the product name if there is no product? (maybe leaving the value blank?) Thanks! :-) Regards, Alan From jfearn at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 04:10:18 2015 From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:10:18 +1000 Subject: [publican-list] Non-product documentation In-Reply-To: <20150906011155.15801b0sjycfdzr4@10.215.1.9> References: <20150906011155.15801b0sjycfdzr4@10.215.1.9> Message-ID: <55F79A2A.8050206@redhat.com> On 09/06/2015 06:11 PM, Alan Murrell wrote: > Hi all, > > this question is for those who may currently use Publication for > non-product-based technical documentation, for example, a document > giving step-by-step instructions for adding a user to Office 365. > > In cases of that type of documentation, what do you enter as the > "Product"? Is it possible to suppress the product name if there is no > product? (maybe leaving the value blank?) > > Thanks! :-) Hi ALan, I could have sworn I replied to this ... but the archive says no o_O You can set the product, version, etc, in the pubican.conf file and delete the tags from the XML. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Senior Software Engineer PnT - DevOps - Development Red Hat Asia Pacific Pty Ltd http://dilbert.com/fast/2004-08-17/ From lists at murrell.ca Fri Sep 18 06:47:49 2015 From: lists at murrell.ca (Alan Murrell) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 23:47:49 -0700 Subject: [publican-list] Code syntax highlighting in PDF Message-ID: <55FBB395.5040406@murrell.ca> Hello, I am running Publican 4.3.2 on Fedora 22 (Publican packages just got updated so they properly build the documents. Yay!) I was playing around with including code samples and the syntax highlighting works with HTML formats but there is no such highlighting in the PDF format. What would I need to add to the PDF XSL file to make this so? Thanks! :-) Regards, Alan From lists at murrell.ca Fri Sep 18 07:07:00 2015 From: lists at murrell.ca (Alan Murrell) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:07:00 -0700 Subject: [publican-list] "list" options not honoured in HTML Message-ID: <55FBB814.1050108@murrell.ca> I was playing around with and added the following options: It renders as indicated in PDF, but in the HTML versions, is keeps roman numeral numbering and default spacing. is this an adjustment that has to be made to the CSS stylesheet, or elsewhere for HTML rendering to honour the "list" options? Thanks! :-) Regards, Alan From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 02:34:04 2015 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 02:34:04 +0000 Subject: [publican-list] [Bug 628266] Apostrophes presented as entities in POT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628266 Laura Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|lbailey at redhat.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NN9hxsG1Xh&a=cc_unsubscribe