[Pulp-dev] Upcoming epel6 Dependency Issues

[Brian Bouterse]

After some discussion today we determined the following will be done:

@mhrivnak is going to solicit feedback via pulp-list on how long (time or
release) users want us to continue producing el6 builds for.
I will produce a blog post identifying what this epel6 change means for EL6
Pulp users

We decided to not enable comments on blog posts to keep the discussion in
one place (pulp-list). Thank you @elyezer for the feedback.



On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Elyezer Rezende <erezende at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Do these kinds of next steps make any sense? What are some other
>> approaches or next steps that would be good/better?
>>
>
> Trying to get user feedback makes completely sense to me. Having that
> feedback as early as possible will help us find how we can support Pulp
> users and identify the impact of dropping RHEL6 support.
>
> About enabling comments on blog posts I remember we talking about that for
> other reason and maybe this is a good opportunity to have it.
>
> --
> Elyézer Rezende
> Senior Quality Engineer
> irc: elyezer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20161114/204c713c/attachment.htm>