[Pulp-dev] RFC: Replace LGTM with github reviews

Sean Myers sean.myers at redhat.com
Tue Oct 4 16:35:48 UTC 2016

On 10/04/2016 11:51 AM, Michael Hrivnak wrote:
> Some times a conflict resolution is required when merging forward, so we
> would need to make sure that non-fast-forward case is handled.

This is already the case, since "required status checks" have to pass
before a push is accepted, and there's no way to run those checks (that
I know of) without opening a PR and kicking off travis/jenkins.

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list