[Pulp-dev] Does everything live in pulp.app?
Brian Bouterse
bbouters at redhat.com
Thu Sep 15 15:47:51 UTC 2016
I'm thinking of this in the context of my conversion of the tasking
system to use the new Django-based models. As part of that transition
the "tasking system code" is moving out of
pulp/server/pulp/server/async/* and moving into
pulp/app/pulp/app/tasks/* This will make imports to taking system code
import from pulp.app.tasks
I'm wondering if moving it to pulp.tasks would be a better home? Along
with that line of thinking, we would only put code in the Django app
which Django uses. Views, Models, Migrations, Settings, Middleware.
Things like that.
This would cause any number of python packages to live as
pulp.<mypackagename> instead of pulp.app.<mypackagename>
In summary, my two questions are:
1) Should a thing like the tasks module live in pulp.app.tasks or
pulp.tasks?
2) If it does live at pulp.app.tasks should we always import it as
pulp.app.tasks or should I instead do:
from django.db.models import get_app
pulp_tasks_module = get_app('pulp').tasks
Right now I lean towards placing the code at pulp.tasks and using normal
Python importing like "from pulp import tasks".
What do you think?
-Brian
More information about the Pulp-dev
mailing list