[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3
dkliban at redhat.com
Fri Apr 7 19:15:28 UTC 2017
This should definitely be a PUP. I like the pulpproj prefix.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:
> Pulp3 can't use the 'pulp' Python namespace like we did on Pulp2 because
> it's already taken on PyPI and we don't want to conflict. We need to decide
> on some new Python package names.
> I've updated a previous write-up with options we have in this area. It
> talks about package name options for pip installing purposes, and it
> discusses how we will lay out the packages within site-packages.
> I prefer the prefix of 'pulpproj' with "idea 2". I also prefer all
> packages will install under a top level dir. So that would cause platform
> to pip install with:
> pip install pulpproj
> pip install pulpproj_cli
> pip install pulpproj_streamer
> All of ^ packages would be laid out on the filesystem as:
> ├── cli
> ├── common
> ├── platform
> └── streamer
> What are your thoughts and ideas? What do you prefer? Also should this
> become a PUP?
> : https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2444#note-7
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev