[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3

[Austin Macdonald]

Another alternative: plp

Pros:
 - super short!
 - pinky typing exercise

Cons:
 - Fonts are silly: plp (PLP) looks like pIp (PIP)
 - sounds "web 2.0"


On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Sean Myers <sean.myers at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 04/12/2017 10:48 AM, Austin Macdonald wrote:
> > I like pulp3 better, but it has some weirdness. I'm stating the obvious,
> > but we wouldn't be able to keep the name for pulp 4. When we put our
> major
> > versions on PyPI, they will all be treated as completely separate
> projects.
> > I don't see a big problem there, but it is unusual.
>
> You can do a little handwave and say "uh, it's pulp for python3! yeah!" and
> feel good about pulp3 again, I think. :)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170412/70b2255f/attachment.htm>