[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3
dalley at redhat.com
Wed Apr 12 19:55:30 UTC 2017
I'm not a fan of plp, it does look too much like pip IMO
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Austin Macdonald <amacdona at redhat.com>
> Another alternative: plp
> - super short!
> - pinky typing exercise
> - Fonts are silly: plp (PLP) looks like pIp (PIP)
> - sounds "web 2.0"
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Sean Myers <sean.myers at redhat.com>
>> On 04/12/2017 10:48 AM, Austin Macdonald wrote:
>> > I like pulp3 better, but it has some weirdness. I'm stating the obvious,
>> > but we wouldn't be able to keep the name for pulp 4. When we put our
>> > versions on PyPI, they will all be treated as completely separate
>> > I don't see a big problem there, but it is unusual.
>> You can do a little handwave and say "uh, it's pulp for python3! yeah!"
>> feel good about pulp3 again, I think. :)
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev