[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3

[Daniel Alley]

I'm not a fan of plp, it does look too much like pip IMO

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Austin Macdonald <amacdona at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Another alternative: plp
>
> Pros:
>  - super short!
>  - pinky typing exercise
>
> Cons:
>  - Fonts are silly: plp (PLP) looks like pIp (PIP)
>  - sounds "web 2.0"
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Sean Myers <sean.myers at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 04/12/2017 10:48 AM, Austin Macdonald wrote:
>> > I like pulp3 better, but it has some weirdness. I'm stating the obvious,
>> > but we wouldn't be able to keep the name for pulp 4. When we put our
>> major
>> > versions on PyPI, they will all be treated as completely separate
>> projects.
>> > I don't see a big problem there, but it is unusual.
>>
>> You can do a little handwave and say "uh, it's pulp for python3! yeah!"
>> and
>> feel good about pulp3 again, I think. :)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170412/45bad28d/attachment.htm>