[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3

[Brian Bouterse]

+0 pulp3
+1 pulpproj
-0 pulpproject
-0 pulp_platform
-1 plp

We also need to answer the related question [0] about how the packages are
going to be laid out. I'm +1 to having the top level namespace (the name
above) contain the subnamespaces i.e. 'platform', 'common', 'streamer', and
'cli'.

[0]:
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2444#Will-all-packages-install-under-a-top-level-directory-or-not

-Brian

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Michael Hrivnak <mhrivnak at redhat.com>
wrote:

>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Austin Macdonald <austin at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It feels like we are approaching a consensus around `pulp3`. I would like
>> to take an informal poll using the voting syntax from PUP-1. [0] The other
>> questions need to be hashed out a little more.
>>
>>
>
> +0 pulp3
> -0 pulpproject
> +0  pulpproj
> -0 pulp_platform
> -1 plp
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170413/2b4bea9f/attachment.htm>