[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3

[Ina Panova]

I went through all the thread and I personally do not like any of options.

-1 pulp3
+0 pulpproj
-0 pulp_platform
-1 plp


I somehow agree what Jeff pointed out but looks like pulpproj given the
current situation is the 'winner'.

I do not know what to do about this, but maybe email our community and ask
what do they think? maybe they will come up with new ideas. Not sure if it
is a good idea, though.



--------
Regards,

Ina Panova
Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.

"Do not go where the path may lead,
 go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1 to pulpproj
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Sean Myers <sean.myers at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 04/19/2017 12:02 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
>> > Two fyi's relating to the names. (1) pulpproj is our twitter handle.
>> Both
>> > pulp and pulpproject were already taken. (2) I agree that pulp3 could
>> be a
>> > headache down the road regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or Python3.
>>
>> Yeah, I was only kidding about the python3 thing, it's too ambiguous.
>>
>> I'm still +1 pulpproj
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170420/6ce850d7/attachment.htm>