[Pulp-dev] Deferring 3 things for Pulp3 to 3.1+
bizhang at redhat.com
Wed Dec 13 15:02:49 UTC 2017
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Jeff Ortel <jortel at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/12/2017 10:47 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> As we get to the end of the MVP planning for Pulp3, I want to check-in
> about deferring 3 areas of Pulp functionality to the 3.1+ page . I'm
> looking for feedback, especially -1s, about deferring the following 3
> things from the Pulp 3.0 release. This would finalize a few still-red or
> totally missing areas of the MVP .
> - Consumer Applicability. Pulp3 won't manage consumers, but Pulp is still
> in a good position to offer applicability. Katello uses it significantly,
> but they won't be using the 3.0 release.
> - Lazy downloading. I think this should be a top 3.1 priority. It will
> take a significant effort to update/test/release the streamer so I don't
> think we can include it in 3.0 for practical timeline reasons.
> - Content Protection. I believe we want both basic auth and key based
> verification of content served by the Pulp content app. This is an easy
> feature to add, but not one I think we should plan fully or do as part of
> the 3.0 MVP.
> Please send thoughts or ideas on these changes soon, so we can finalize
> the MVP document in the next few days.
> : https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/31+_Ideas_(post_MVP)
> : https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Pulp_3_Minimum_
> Thank you,
> Pulp-dev mailing listPulp-dev at redhat.comhttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev