[Pulp-dev] Deferring 3 things for Pulp3 to 3.1+

Preethi Thomas pthomas at redhat.com
Fri Dec 15 22:02:10 UTC 2017

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Bryan Kearney <bkearney at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/12/2017 11:47 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> >
> > - Lazy downloading. I think this should be a top 3.1 priority. It will
> > take a significant effort to update/test/release the streamer so I don't
> > think we can include it in 3.0 for practical timeline reasons.
> This is the one that worries me. Do non katello folks use this at all?
> This is a huge win for the katello folks.

Streamer required a lot of QE time and had a number of issues when it was
first introduced. Considering that, I think the sooner it lands in Pulp3,
the better it will be to get more testing done before it lands in Katello's

> --bk
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20171215/a7bd73b5/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list