[Pulp-dev] Merging forward commits

[Jeff Ortel]

+1

On 01/30/2017 04:16 PM, Sean Myers wrote:
> We've had similar discussions in the past and, iirc, we're generally in favor
> of moving to a cherry-picking model from master to release branches. The (a?)
> problem is that the Pulp 2 build system is heavily dependent on the merge
> forward logic, so if we did switch to cherry-picking, it would be for Pulp 3.
> 
> That said, I'm +1 for cherry-picking from master to release branches for Pulp
> 3+, and largely for the reasons you state here. As the current "guy who knows
> which branch to open PRs against", it would be great if, when asked what branch
> to open PRs against, the answer was always "master".

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 847 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170131/1a40e536/attachment.sig>