[Pulp-dev] PUP Process: "obvious consensus"

Daniel Alley dalley at redhat.com
Mon Jun 12 17:26:21 UTC 2017


We could use the metric that a PUP passes if there are no -1s and more than
1/3 of the team considers it an improvement (+0 or +1).  If more than
2/3rds the team is voting -0, it probably needs more discussion.



On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Bryan Kearney <bkearney at redhat.com> wrote:

> I liked what Brian said, pick the model. Default to change or not. If you
> guys decide to default to change, I agree with Ina that the proposal is a
> +1. So, what would all 0s mean?
>
> -- bk
>
> On 06/12/2017 11:43 AM, Ina Panova wrote:
>
>> Having at least one  +1 is not impartial approach just because the
>> developer who , as you said, found the time for the research and writing
>> down the proposal obviously will vote as +1 :)
>>
>>
>>
>> --------
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ina Panova
>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>
>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>   go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Austin Macdonald <amacdona at redhat.com
>> <mailto:amacdona at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     This reminds me of the concept of a "Do-ocracy".
>>
>>     If developers take the time to research and write up a proposal,
>>     they have "done". It seems completely reasonable to default to the
>>     opinion of the people that cared enough to do the work. If it isn't
>>     the right decision, then someone must actively block it, simple as
>> that.
>>
>>     I think the rule should be "PUP passes if we have at least one +1
>>     and no -1s".
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Pulp-dev mailing list
>>     Pulp-dev at redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-dev at redhat.com>
>>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170612/4bcceaf8/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list