[Pulp-dev] Including the pulp-deb plugin in pulp 2.14

[Mihai Ibanescu]

Testing on a pulp server with
pulp-server-2.14.0-0.1.alpha.git.18878.518e345.fc24.noarch (and its
friends):

pulp-admin deb repo create --repo-id test-1-deb
pulp-admin deb repo uploads deb --repo-id test-1-deb -f
nscd_2.24-7ubuntu2_amd64.deb
pulp-admin deb repo publish run --repo-id test-1-deb

Confirmed a debian repo got created.

URL=https://my-server.example.com/pulp/deb/test-1-deb/
pulp-admin deb repo create --repo-id test-2-deb --feed $URL
--verify-feed-ssl false --relative-url top/test-2-deb
pulp-admin deb repo sync run --repo-id test-2-deb

Conformed a repo got created.

pulp-admin deb repo delete --repo-id test-1-deb
pulp-admin deb repo delete --repo-id test-2-deb


I call that a success! :-)


On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:

> Great. For now, we're just doing scratch builds to ensure things can be
> built without issue. Whatever version is merged when the 2.14 beta goes to
> be made[0] (tentatively July 5) is what will ship with 2.14 unless you tell
> us otherwise.
>
> Thanks Mihai!
>
> [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/2140_Release_Status
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Mihai Ibanescu <mihai.ibanescu at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> As of now, 1.5.1 is what I am expecting.
>>
>> However, there are some very good contributions as PRs in the pipe, and
>> if I were to merge them they would probably result in 1.6.
>>
>> Mihai
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mihai, I'm interested to hear how the testing goes between pulp_deb and
>>> the master branch of core (what will become 2.14). Also I want to check in
>>> on the version number. Do you expect pulp_deb to be released as version
>>> 1.5.1? That is what is currently in the spec file.
>>>
>>> Thanks for all the testing and contribution!
>>> Brian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mihai,
>>>>
>>>> both of the Tasks are added to the sprint, so they will be worked on
>>>> asap.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Ina Panova
>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>>
>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Mihai Ibanescu <
>>>> mihai.ibanescu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> We have had discussions on the IRC channel about adding pulp-deb
>>>>> (debian support for pulp) in 2.14.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have filed this:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2802
>>>>>
>>>>> The unit tests pass against the master branch. I am in the process of
>>>>> installing a server from master to validate that things do indeed work as
>>>>> expected.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe we need consensus that we should do it, and figure out what
>>>>> needs to be done and who will do that. At the very least, python-debpkgr
>>>>> would need to be packaged as an rpm and included in the yum repo (subtask
>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2803)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170612/8b7cdc17/attachment.htm>