[Pulp-dev] Including the pulp-deb plugin in pulp 2.14

[Brian Bouterse]

This is great! Thanks @misa. It looks like pulp_deb is ready to be included
in 2.14!

As an aside, I talked w/ @ichimonji10 yesterday who can help guide a pulp
smash contribution. If we had pulp_smash tests for pulp_deb, they would run
nightly against core to ensure compatibility and correctness of the
pulp_deb workflow/codepaths.

As a second aside, is there any way we could have a community demo of this
prior to the launch of 2.14. The two demo dates prior to the GA of 2.14 are
June 15th and July 6th. We can take either pre-recorded standalone videos
or a live demo.

Thanks again,
Brian

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Mihai Ibanescu <mihai.ibanescu at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Testing on a pulp server with pulp-server-2.14.0-0.1.alpha.git.18878.518e345.fc24.noarch
> (and its friends):
>
> pulp-admin deb repo create --repo-id test-1-deb
> pulp-admin deb repo uploads deb --repo-id test-1-deb -f
> nscd_2.24-7ubuntu2_amd64.deb
> pulp-admin deb repo publish run --repo-id test-1-deb
>
> Confirmed a debian repo got created.
>
> URL=https://my-server.example.com/pulp/deb/test-1-deb/
> pulp-admin deb repo create --repo-id test-2-deb --feed $URL
> --verify-feed-ssl false --relative-url top/test-2-deb
> pulp-admin deb repo sync run --repo-id test-2-deb
>
> Conformed a repo got created.
>
> pulp-admin deb repo delete --repo-id test-1-deb
> pulp-admin deb repo delete --repo-id test-2-deb
>
>
> I call that a success! :-)
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Great. For now, we're just doing scratch builds to ensure things can be
>> built without issue. Whatever version is merged when the 2.14 beta goes to
>> be made[0] (tentatively July 5) is what will ship with 2.14 unless you tell
>> us otherwise.
>>
>> Thanks Mihai!
>>
>> [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/2140_Release_Status
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Mihai Ibanescu <
>> mihai.ibanescu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> As of now, 1.5.1 is what I am expecting.
>>>
>>> However, there are some very good contributions as PRs in the pipe, and
>>> if I were to merge them they would probably result in 1.6.
>>>
>>> Mihai
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mihai, I'm interested to hear how the testing goes between pulp_deb and
>>>> the master branch of core (what will become 2.14). Also I want to check in
>>>> on the version number. Do you expect pulp_deb to be released as version
>>>> 1.5.1? That is what is currently in the spec file.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for all the testing and contribution!
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mihai,
>>>>>
>>>>> both of the Tasks are added to the sprint, so they will be worked on
>>>>> asap.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ina Panova
>>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Mihai Ibanescu <
>>>>> mihai.ibanescu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have had discussions on the IRC channel about adding pulp-deb
>>>>>> (debian support for pulp) in 2.14.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have filed this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2802
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The unit tests pass against the master branch. I am in the process of
>>>>>> installing a server from master to validate that things do indeed work as
>>>>>> expected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe we need consensus that we should do it, and figure out what
>>>>>> needs to be done and who will do that. At the very least, python-debpkgr
>>>>>> would need to be packaged as an rpm and included in the yum repo (subtask
>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2803)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170613/6b23d30c/attachment.htm>