[Pulp-dev] pulp3: Publishing Proposal

[Jeff Ortel]

On 06/28/2017 03:05 PM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> 
> How would this scale? Assume 10k machines are doing a yum update? How would you handle the thundering heard
> issue?

I believe it would scale very well.  The bits would still be served by Apache and the DB lookup would be very
fast with low overhead.  For "thundering heard", the DB lookup should be negligible compared to uploading the
bits.

> 
> Have you checked out how koji handles packages? The use files on disk, but all the package metadata are urls
> back to the a single location on disk. This may be too rpm specific however. See
> http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/repos/foreman-nightly-fedora24-build/latest/x86_64/.
> 
> -- bk

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 847 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170628/605f2977/attachment.sig>