[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3

[Ina Panova]

Team,

we need to make some progress on this and try to find a common agreement.
Based on the email thread, i will summarize the options which where
proposed.
I will highlight mainly the concerns brought up by people( where there have
been expressed any).
I would like to hear more feedback *here in the thread*  so later i can
shrink the options and then i will create the Doodle for voting.


1) pulpproj, pulp_project, pulpproject.
    - Some people are opposed to having any form of the word "project" as
part of the name.
    It's like having Firefox be named "firefoxproj".
    Plus pulpproject is already taken.
2) pulp3
    - is ambiguous regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or Python3.
3) plp - looks like pip
4) pulpapp vs pulp_app
5) pulp_platform
6) spot for new ideas

I encourage you all to *speak your piece *before I would create the Doodle.



--------
Regards,

Ina Panova
Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.

"Do not go where the path may lead,
 go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Daniel Alley <dalley at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1 pulpapp
> +0 pulpproj
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> we have not considered yet 'pulpapp'
>>
>> pip install pulpapp
>> pip install pulpapp_cli
>> pip install pulpapp_streamer
>>
>>
>>
>> --------
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ina Panova
>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>
>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I went through all the thread and I personally do not like any of
>>> options.
>>>
>>> -1 pulp3
>>> +0 pulpproj
>>> -0 pulp_platform
>>> -1 plp
>>>
>>>
>>> I somehow agree what Jeff pointed out but looks like pulpproj given the
>>> current situation is the 'winner'.
>>>
>>> I do not know what to do about this, but maybe email our community and
>>> ask what do they think? maybe they will come up with new ideas. Not sure if
>>> it is a good idea, though.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ina Panova
>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>
>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 to pulpproj
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Sean Myers <sean.myers at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/19/2017 12:02 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
>>>>> > Two fyi's relating to the names. (1) pulpproj is our twitter handle.
>>>>> Both
>>>>> > pulp and pulpproject were already taken. (2) I agree that pulp3
>>>>> could be a
>>>>> > headache down the road regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or
>>>>> Python3.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I was only kidding about the python3 thing, it's too ambiguous.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still +1 pulpproj
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170504/4cf26ec5/attachment.htm>