[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3

David Davis daviddavis at redhat.com
Thu May 4 14:43:52 UTC 2017

Agreed. +0 to pulpproj for me.


On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Jeremy Audet <jaudet at redhat.com> wrote:

> > 2) pulp3
> >     - is ambiguous regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or Python3.
> Yes. Also, using "pulp3" makes it easy for a naming conflict to occur with
> the existing PuLP <https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PuLP> package. What
> happens when their project also gets to version 3? Or when their project
> gets to version 4, and downstream packagers want to have a separate package
> for versions 4 and 3 of PuLP? One could say that this won't be an issue on
> account of the differing capitalization of the projects' names. But I don't
> think that capitalization is a good differentiator, as demonstrated by the
> NetworkManager project.
> And less importantly, using "pulp3" will force us to switch to "pulp4,"
> "pulp5," etc as new major versions of Pulp come out.
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170504/c65d0226/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list