[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3
dalley at redhat.com
Fri May 5 04:55:09 UTC 2017
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:
> +1 pulpproj
> -0 pulpproject
> -0 pulp_platform
> -1 plp
> -1 pulp3
> Also I'm +1 to having the top level namespace (the name above) contain the
> subnamespaces i.e. 'platform', 'common', 'streamer', and 'cli'. So that
> would be a 'yes' to .
> : https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2444#Will-all-packages-install-u
> Thanks for pushing this forward.
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:43 AM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>> Agreed. +0 to pulpproj for me.
>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Jeremy Audet <jaudet at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> > 2) pulp3
>>> > - is ambiguous regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or Python3.
>>> Yes. Also, using "pulp3" makes it easy for a naming conflict to occur
>>> with the existing PuLP <https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PuLP> package.
>>> What happens when their project also gets to version 3? Or when their
>>> project gets to version 4, and downstream packagers want to have a separate
>>> package for versions 4 and 3 of PuLP? One could say that this won't be an
>>> issue on account of the differing capitalization of the projects' names.
>>> But I don't think that capitalization is a good differentiator, as
>>> demonstrated by the NetworkManager project.
>>> And less importantly, using "pulp3" will force us to switch to "pulp4,"
>>> "pulp5," etc as new major versions of Pulp come out.
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev