[Pulp-dev] No 'result' field for a Task in Pulp3
mhrivnak at redhat.com
Mon May 8 20:48:04 UTC 2017
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Jeff Ortel <jortel at redhat.com> wrote:
> "result" report /could/ provide an indicator of success and a
> summary/detail of work completed. These two
> things seem completely different. I'm not advocating for a "result", just
> pointing out the differences.
Exactly. If tasks had a "result" field, it should contain references to
whatever the task produced. If we start tracking things like publications
and repo versions, then it could make sense for the task to contain a
result field with an appropriate reference to the object(s) it created.
Principal Software Engineer, RHCE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev