[Pulp-dev] No 'result' field for a Task in Pulp3

Michael Hrivnak mhrivnak at redhat.com
Mon May 8 20:48:04 UTC 2017

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Jeff Ortel <jortel at redhat.com> wrote:

> The
> "result" report /could/ provide an indicator of success and a
> summary/detail of work completed.  These two
> things seem completely different.  I'm not advocating for a "result", just
> pointing out the differences.

Exactly. If tasks had a "result" field, it should contain references to
whatever the task produced. If we start tracking things like publications
and repo versions, then it could make sense for the task to contain a
result field with an appropriate reference to the object(s) it created.


Michael Hrivnak

Principal Software Engineer, RHCE

Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170508/58c8542b/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list