[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3

[Ina Panova]

So looks like based on previous input, the results are:

1) PyPI name is ---> pulpproj

2) The answer to the question:

Will all packages install under a top level directory or not? YES

and it will look like:
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2444#Will-all-packages-install-under-a-top-level-directory-or-not


If you deathly disagree please speak out now, otherwise these would be the
final decision taken in order to complete https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2444



--------
Regards,

Ina Panova
Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.

"Do not go where the path may lead,
 go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Michael Hrivnak <mhrivnak at redhat.com> wrote:

> Since "app" is a specific concept within Pulp (both a celery app and one
> or more django apps), it could be awkward for the entire python namespace
> to include the word "app". "import pulpapp.app" feels odd. I would stick
> with something that does not overlap with the name of any existing
> component or concept in Pulp.
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> we have not considered yet 'pulpapp'
>>
>> pip install pulpapp
>> pip install pulpapp_cli
>> pip install pulpapp_streamer
>>
>>
>>
>> --------
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ina Panova
>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>
>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I went through all the thread and I personally do not like any of
>>> options.
>>>
>>> -1 pulp3
>>> +0 pulpproj
>>> -0 pulp_platform
>>> -1 plp
>>>
>>>
>>> I somehow agree what Jeff pointed out but looks like pulpproj given the
>>> current situation is the 'winner'.
>>>
>>> I do not know what to do about this, but maybe email our community and
>>> ask what do they think? maybe they will come up with new ideas. Not sure if
>>> it is a good idea, though.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ina Panova
>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>
>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 to pulpproj
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Sean Myers <sean.myers at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/19/2017 12:02 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
>>>>> > Two fyi's relating to the names. (1) pulpproj is our twitter handle.
>>>>> Both
>>>>> > pulp and pulpproject were already taken. (2) I agree that pulp3
>>>>> could be a
>>>>> > headache down the road regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or
>>>>> Python3.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I was only kidding about the python3 thing, it's too ambiguous.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still +1 pulpproj
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Michael Hrivnak
>
> Principal Software Engineer, RHCE
>
> Red Hat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170509/4219e67c/attachment.htm>