[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3

[Jeff Ortel]

Hate to be the trouble maker but (for all the reasons I've already given) I think having any form of 'project'
in the name of an application or python package makes no sense at all.  I've racked my brain but have not come
up with a better name.  I vote we continue brainstorming rather than get this wrong.


On 05/09/2017 06:20 AM, Ina Panova wrote:
> So looks like based on previous input, the results are:
> 
> 1) PyPI name is ---> pulpproj
> 
> 2) The answer to the question:
> 
> Will all packages install under a top level directory or not? YES
> 
> and it will look like:
> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2444#Will-all-packages-install-under-a-top-level-directory-or-not
> 
> 
> If you deathly disagree please speak out now, otherwise these would be the final decision taken in order to
> complete https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2444
> 
> 
> 
> --------
> Regards,
> 
> Ina Panova
> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
> 
> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
> 
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Michael Hrivnak <mhrivnak at redhat.com <mailto:mhrivnak at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Since "app" is a specific concept within Pulp (both a celery app and one or more django apps), it could be
>     awkward for the entire python namespace to include the word "app". "import pulpapp.app" feels odd. I would
>     stick with something that does not overlap with the name of any existing component or concept in Pulp.
> 
>     On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com <mailto:ipanova at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>         we have not considered yet 'pulpapp'
> 
>         pip install pulpapp
>         pip install pulpapp_cli
>         pip install pulpapp_streamer
> 
> 
> 
>         --------
>         Regards,
> 
>         Ina Panova
>         Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
> 
>         "Do not go where the path may lead,
>          go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
> 
>         On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com <mailto:ipanova at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>             I went through all the thread and I personally do not like any of options.
> 
>             -1 pulp3
>             +0 pulpproj
>             -0 pulp_platform
>             -1 plp
> 
> 
>             I somehow agree what Jeff pointed out but looks like pulpproj given the current situation is the
>             'winner'.
> 
>             I do not know what to do about this, but maybe email our community and ask what do they think?
>             maybe they will come up with new ideas. Not sure if it is a good idea, though.
> 
> 
> 
>             --------
>             Regards,
> 
>             Ina Panova
>             Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
> 
>             "Do not go where the path may lead,
>              go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
> 
>             On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com <mailto:dkliban at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>                 +1 to pulpproj
> 
>                 On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Sean Myers <sean.myers at redhat.com
>                 <mailto:sean.myers at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>                     On 04/19/2017 12:02 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
>                     > Two fyi's relating to the names. (1) pulpproj is our twitter handle. Both
>                     > pulp and pulpproject were already taken. (2) I agree that pulp3 could be a
>                     > headache down the road regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or Python3.
> 
>                     Yeah, I was only kidding about the python3 thing, it's too ambiguous.
> 
>                     I'm still +1 pulpproj
> 
> 
> 
>                     _______________________________________________
>                     Pulp-dev mailing list
>                     Pulp-dev at redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-dev at redhat.com>
>                     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>                     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev>
> 
> 
> 
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 Pulp-dev mailing list
>                 Pulp-dev at redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-dev at redhat.com>
>                 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>                 <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         _______________________________________________
>         Pulp-dev mailing list
>         Pulp-dev at redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-dev at redhat.com>
>         https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     -- 
> 
>     Michael Hrivnak
> 
>     Principal Software Engineer, RHCE 
> 
>     Red Hat
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 847 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170509/e3d07be8/attachment.sig>