[Pulp-dev] Terms: unassociate vs. disassociate

[Brian Bouterse]

+1 to using remove and not delete. Delete to me implies the deletion of the
content versus removing it from the repo.

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1 for add/remove. An aside note, i want to make sure we stick to 'remove'
> specifically' and not 'delete'.
> I wanted to bring this up, since these 2 terms are quite similar but still
> feels different.
>
>
>
> --------
> Regards,
>
> Ina Panova
> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>
> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 to the "adding ..." and "removing ..." terminology. I think it will be
>> more clear for users.
>>
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Jeremy Audet <jaudet at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > As an end-user I agree with the add/remove lexicon being more clear to
>>> users, if not more technically accurate.
>>>
>>> Same. Either phrasing gets the message across, but IMO, "add content to
>>> a repository" is more unambiguous.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170524/009ec1a7/attachment.htm>