[Pulp-dev] PUP-3: Proposal to change our git workflow
amacdona at redhat.com
Fri May 26 17:18:33 UTC 2017
Currently, "The general rule is to always choose the oldest upstream branch
that will need to contain your work."  In practice, this means that
bugfixes will default to an x.y-dev branch (and therefore a z release). The
PUP-3 process would include bugfixes in x.y-dev only if we actively decide
to cherry-pick it back. I assume that this would lead to fewer bugfixes in
z releases and more bugfixes in y releases.
If we religiously follow semantic versioning and have a short, reliable
release process, I hope our bugfixes will be consumed by updating to the
latest Y release of Pulp. Put another way, I think that cherry-picks are a
great idea IFF we use them less often than we currently merge forward.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev