[Pulp-dev] Webserver owning the entire url namespace?

[Jeff Ortel]

Wont this mean users cannot run pulp as part of a stack .. like in Satellite?  What about the Katello API?

On 11/02/2017 04:19 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> We're looking at developing apache/nginx scripts, and I was thinking about documenting the webserver
> requirements. I think Pulp probably has to be rooted at / on any given site so that it can host live APIs.
> Users can still vhost multiple sites at other hostnames so I think it's ok, but I'm interested in what others
> think. I wrote this up here [0] for some discussion on the issue.
> 
> [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3114
> 
> -Brian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 847 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20171103/a721d0ce/attachment.sig>