[Pulp-dev] Proposal to replace pulp 2.15's nightly jobs

Preethi Thomas pthomas at redhat.com
Fri Nov 10 16:16:15 UTC 2017


On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Patrick Creech <pcreech at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 10:26 -0500, Jeremy Audet wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Patrick Creech <pcreech at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > > As part of the ongoing release engineer changes, I would like to
> propose utilizing the pulp-
> > > packaging* jobs in jenkins for nightlies going forward and turning off
> the build-automation jobs
> > > starting monday.
> >
> > We have any releases in progress. The next beta build will be 2.14.3 on
> Nov 14th. This seems like
> > a great time to switch to something new.
>
> Good point, I probably should have been more specific by stating 2.15's
> nightly jobs, not all of
> them.  I don't want to touch 2.14's jobs since we have a nice cutoff
> barrier between 2.14.3 and
> 2.15.0 releases.  Moving 2.15+ nightly's workflows over sooner than later
> though will help with the
> preparation for 2.15.0's release.  The 2.14's jobs would simply be turned
> off after 2.14.3 ga's.
>

+1 I like this plan. This will help us to be able look at the results more
easily and not get confused over the different UI tabs.

>
> > > Something of note, the location for pulp-packaging's nightly rpms are
> at http://koji.katello.org
> > > /rel
> > > eases/yum/pulp-nightly/pulp/ (bits are tested there).  Would this be
> ok as the current new place
> > > for
> > > nightly rpms, or would we want to sync them over to
> repos.fedorapeople.org?
> >
> > Hosting packages in just one place is simpler than hosting packages in
> multiple places. There's
> > less room for error when the simpler thing is done.
>
> It shouldn't be too hard to set up.  I would probably want to keep it in a
> 'nightly' or 'master'
> folder instead of a versioned folder, to help aign the intent of
> explicitly distinguishing this
> workflow from others.  Thoughts?
>
> > > I'm also open to suggestions for more reflective job names than
> 'pulp-packaging*'
> > >
> > > You're friendly neighborhood Release Engineer
> > > Patrick
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pulp-dev mailing list
> > > Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
> > >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20171110/7efd4564/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list