[Pulp-dev] Infrastructure tracker on pulp.plan.io

[Daniel Alley]

Would this new tracker be the proper home for issues regarding Jenkins,
Travis, nodepool, etc?  And, if so, should we move those issues out of
whichever trackers they exist in currently (many in "Pulp Packaging" [0], a
few in "Pulp" [1] [2] [3], etc.)

[0] https://pulp.plan.io/projects/packaging/issues
[1] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3124
[2] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3116
[3] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2908

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:

> I made a project tracker called 'Infrastructure' on pulp.plan.io [0].
> It's managed by a new group on Redmine called 'Infrastructure Admins'. That
> group has the Open Source Container Initiative folks and myself, so we can
> coordinate on infra stuff. For instance, we'll be tracking things like the
> upcoming migration of docs.pulpproject.org [1] in that tracker.
>
> Feedback, questions, or ideas are welcome.
>
> [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/infrastructure/
> [1]: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3153
>
> -Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20171128/3fd583f3/attachment.htm>