[Pulp-dev] Pulp 3 plugin API gap analysis

Robin Chan rchan at redhat.com
Thu Apr 5 15:41:26 UTC 2018

So red before meant that these were items we needed to make a decision on
later. They were gaps in our design or plan.

Now, do statements in red mean we need to discuss them now? Put another
way, what are the next steps to resolve these newly identified gaps.

We will have plenty of items that have no [done] or [in-progress] - which
leave not started. Was this meant to identify gaps in plan or gaps in

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:

> Milan and I spent some time auditing our Plugin API section[0] of the MVP
> document. I have updated the document with our findings[1].
> There is now a lot more red, but it is mostly related to documentation and
> bad wording of use cases.
> [0] https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Pulp_3_Minimum_
> Viable_Product#Plugin-API
> [1] https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Pulp_3_Minimum_
> Viable_Product/diff?utf8=%E2%9C%93&version=154&version_
> from=153&commit=View+differences
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180405/921e018f/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list