[Pulp-dev] Content paths in Pulp 3

[Brian Bouterse]

+1 to option 1. It's consistent.

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:

> Option 1 is the most consistent. +1 to option 1
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Austin Macdonald <amacdona at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> IMO:
>> We should suggest v3/content/<plugin>/<type>/. [Proposal 1] We should
>> mention the other options with the pros, cons in the plugin writer docs.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:54 AM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> [0] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3407
>>>
>>
>> The correct link is: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3472
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180406/8b1bc5b4/attachment.htm>