[Pulp-dev] Pulp 3 MVP Issue Cleanup

Jeff Ortel jortel at redhat.com
Tue Apr 10 15:23:32 UTC 2018

On 04/10/2018 10:15 AM, Jeff Ortel wrote:
> On 04/04/2018 05:09 PM, Dennis Kliban wrote:
>> Anything that is going to have it's own release cadence should be 
>> tracked in it's own project. That way we can assign issues related to 
>> specific release of that project to the particular release.
>> Are we going to release the CLI, Ansible Installer, and the Migration 
>> tool as part of one version of Pulp or will these all be versioned 
>> separately?
> Separately.

Meant to clarify.  The CLI can be released separately but I think the 
migration tool needs to be released in step with Pulp.  As for the 
installer .. seems like that also needs to be released in step with Pulp.

>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:41 PM, Austin Macdonald <austin at redhat.com 
>> <mailto:austin at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>         I'm hoping to continue the "Infrastructure" Redmine project
>>         for things like website hosting. I see what you mean though
>>         because it will be developed and released separately. I think
>>         we're in a similar situation for 3 things: the ansible
>>         installer, the migration tool, and CLI, and for each of them
>>         we should either make their own Redmine projects or a tag
>>         under Pulp. We already have many Redmine projects and they
>>         are kind of a pain so I want to float a tags based approach
>>         for feedback. Perhaps keeping them out of "Pulp" means that
>>         we remove all the existing tags from them and tag them with
>>         new tags like 'Ansible Installer', '2to3 Migration' and 'CLI'?
>>     I had hoped that someday there would be a separate group of
>>     committers for pulp/devel or wherever we keep it. Also, I wouldnt
>>     want potential users/PMs to see a "bug count" that includes
>>     non-user facing issues. These concerns are trivial though, and if
>>     projects are a pain, I'm fine with keeping Tags.
>>     Since projects are a pain, can we get rid of the "external"
>>     project? https://pulp.plan.io/projects/external/issues
>>     <https://pulp.plan.io/projects/external/issues>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Pulp-dev mailing list
>>     Pulp-dev at redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-dev at redhat.com>
>>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180410/77425c97/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list