[Pulp-dev] Pulp 3 MVP Issue Cleanup

[Dennis Kliban]

I still think the CLI should have it's own project if we are going to
version it separately from Pulp. I hope we do version it separately from
pulpcore.

We should use categories for the installer and migration tool.

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Jeff Ortel <jortel at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 04/10/2018 11:28 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
>
> OK so to bring it back to how to manage this in Redmine. We've been
> talking about 'Tags' and I've read a some +1s for their use to track these
> things and no -1s. I want to identify I think it would be better to use the
> 'Category' built-in field of Redmine. Tags can be multi-selcted, but I
> don't think a single issue will need to be a CLI and an Installer and a
> $other_tag all at once (multi-selected). Categories are a single selection
> which seems more appropriate. We also make little use of them today and
> they are built into all Issues redmine has.
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> Should I make a Categories for 'Ansible Installer', 'CLI' and 'Migration
> Tool' in the Pulp project on Redmine?
>
> Other suggestions and ideas are welcome.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Jeff Ortel <jortel at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 04/10/2018 10:15 AM, Jeff Ortel wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/04/2018 05:09 PM, Dennis Kliban wrote:
>>
>> Anything that is going to have it's own release cadence should be tracked
>> in it's own project. That way we can assign issues related to specific
>> release of that project to the particular release.
>>
>> Are we going to release the CLI, Ansible Installer, and the Migration
>> tool as part of one version of Pulp or will these all be versioned
>> separately?
>>
>>
>> Separately.
>>
>>
>> Meant to clarify.  The CLI can be released separately but I think the
>> migration tool needs to be released in step with Pulp.  As for the
>> installer .. seems like that also needs to be released in step with Pulp.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:41 PM, Austin Macdonald <austin at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>> I'm hoping to continue the "Infrastructure" Redmine project for things
>>>> like website hosting. I see what you mean though because it will be
>>>> developed and released separately. I think we're in a similar situation for
>>>> 3 things: the ansible installer, the migration tool, and CLI, and for each
>>>> of them we should either make their own Redmine projects or a tag under
>>>> Pulp. We already have many Redmine projects and they are kind of a pain so
>>>> I want to float a tags based approach for feedback. Perhaps keeping them
>>>> out of "Pulp" means that we remove all the existing tags from them and tag
>>>> them with new tags like 'Ansible Installer', '2to3 Migration' and 'CLI'?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I had hoped that someday there would be a separate group of committers
>>> for pulp/devel or wherever we keep it. Also, I wouldnt want potential
>>> users/PMs to see a "bug count" that includes non-user facing issues. These
>>> concerns are trivial though, and if projects are a pain, I'm fine with
>>> keeping Tags.
>>>
>>> Since projects are a pain, can we get rid of the "external" project?
>>> https://pulp.plan.io/projects/external/issues
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing listPulp-dev at redhat.comhttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180410/9a1b7cd2/attachment.htm>