[Pulp-dev] Commit bit PUP-6

David Davis daviddavis at redhat.com
Fri Aug 17 13:32:16 UTC 2018


Assuming there are no major changes to the PUP, I’ll vote +1.

Thanks for putting this together.

David


On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 7:21 AM Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:

> PR updated,
> ready for re-review.
>
>
>
> --------
> Regards,
>
> Ina Panova
> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>
> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I have opened a PR for PUP-6 [0]  which describes the commit bit
>> assignment/revocation process.
>>
>> Please take a look to review and provide feedback.
>>
>> I'd like to call for a vote by August 28, 2018. Per PUP-1[1], are the
>> voting options:
>>
>> +1: "Will benefit the project and should definitely be adopted."
>> +0: "Might benefit the project and is acceptable."
>> -0: "Might not be the right choice but is acceptable."
>> -1: "I have serious reservations that need to be thought through and
>> addressed."
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/15
>> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md
>> --------
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ina Panova
>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>
>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180817/e00c2e48/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list