[Pulp-dev] Commit bit PUP-6

[Brian Bouterse]

I left some more feedback. The only substantive request is
s/supermajority/two-thirds/ since supermajority can mean several things
per:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermajority

Assuming those comments are addressed, I'm +1.

Thank you so much for putting this together @ipanova!


On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:

> I tried to address all the comments and updates the PR.
>
> Please give another look and vote once you're ready!
>
>
>
> --------
> Regards,
>
> Ina Panova
> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>
> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Dana Walker <dawalker at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I'm a little concerned about the stated drawbacks, but even the
>> alternatives can have issues, so I think this is a good place to start and
>> we can amend the process later if we run into problems and/or we arrive at
>> a good solution to mitigate the drawbacks.
>>
>> --Dana
>>
>> Dana Walker
>>
>> Associate Software Engineer
>>
>> Red Hat
>>
>> <https://www.redhat.com>
>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Robin Chan <rchan at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> I like the clarification to the removal piece. You may accept the
>>> suggestions if they are helpful.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 9:32 AM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Assuming there are no major changes to the PUP, I’ll vote +1.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for putting this together.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 7:21 AM Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> PR updated,
>>>>> ready for re-review.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ina Panova
>>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have opened a PR for PUP-6 [0]  which describes the commit bit
>>>>>> assignment/revocation process.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please take a look to review and provide feedback.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to call for a vote by August 28, 2018. Per PUP-1[1], are
>>>>>> the voting options:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1: "Will benefit the project and should definitely be adopted."
>>>>>> +0: "Might benefit the project and is acceptable."
>>>>>> -0: "Might not be the right choice but is acceptable."
>>>>>> -1: "I have serious reservations that need to be thought through and
>>>>>> addressed."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/15
>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md
>>>>>> --------
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ina Panova
>>>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180824/f2f61527/attachment.htm>