[Pulp-dev] Possible Pulp3 RC Blocker issues from backlog

Austin Macdonald austin at redhat.com
Mon Dec 3 19:41:02 UTC 2018

To be on the safe side, I'd like to highlight issues that *might* need to
be RC blockers. Please reply directly onto the issue, I'll update this
thread periodically if necessary.

REST API, backwards incompatible changes:

   - Add Task Names:
      - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2889
      - IMO: We should make this an RC Blocker, because this will be an
      additional requirement for every task in every plugin.
   - Determine mutable fields
      - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2635
      - IMO: someone (or a group) should take this as assigned and audit
      the mutability of fields. If we find one that needs to change,
it will be a
      backwards incompatible change to the REST API, so this should have the RC
      blocker tack.
   - Status API without db connection
      - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2850
      - IMO: RC blocker or close. As it is the db connection field is not
      useful, and later removal would be backwards incompatible.
   - Add new field, Publication.created
      - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2989
      - IMO: RC blocker or close, this would be a backwards incompatible
   - Asynchronous Distribution update/delete
      - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3044
      - IMO: RC blocker or close, this would be a backwards incompatible


   - Port dependencies to Python 3
      - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2247
      - IMO: It seems like if this weren't done, we'd be having problems.
      Anyone mind if I close this one? If we do need to keep it open, should it
      be an RC blocker?
   - Plugins can declare PluginAPI version
      - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2656
      - IMO: Are we happy with what we've got now? If we want to change it,
      now is the time.


   - pulp-manager migrate order
      - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3062
      - IMO: RC Blocker. This is how users should migrate, so it should be
      correct before RC
   - jwt
      - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3248
      - This was removed from Beta (MVP) but do we need this for RC/GA?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20181203/262a0afa/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list