[Pulp-dev] Using commits instead of PRs in Pulp 3 release notes

[Dana Walker]

I feel like this is more accurate and comprehensive, but the initial
summary is less readable.  I could go either way.  Others?

--Dana

Dana Walker

Associate Software Engineer

Red Hat

<https://www.redhat.com>
<https://red.ht/sig>


On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 2:24 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> Currently in our Pulp 3 release notes[0], we link to a query of PRs with
> the 3.0 tag merged in a certain timeframe. I feel like this is prone to
> user errors as in cases where we might forget to add the 3.0 label to a PR
> or get the timeframe slightly wrong because of timezones. I was thinking
> instead we could maybe link to the list of commits between tags. Here’s an
> example:
>
> https://github.com/pulp/pulp/compare/pulpcore-3.0.0b15...pulpcore-3.0.0b16
>
> If you click on any of these commits, there is a link to the PR by the
> branch name so I feel like there’s no loss of information.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> [0]
> https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/release-notes/pulpcore/3.0.x.html
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20181213/a8da5eac/attachment.htm>