[Pulp-dev] Using commits instead of PRs in Pulp 3 release notes
dawalker at redhat.com
Thu Dec 13 19:28:44 UTC 2018
I feel like this is more accurate and comprehensive, but the initial
summary is less readable. I could go either way. Others?
Associate Software Engineer
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 2:24 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
> Currently in our Pulp 3 release notes, we link to a query of PRs with
> the 3.0 tag merged in a certain timeframe. I feel like this is prone to
> user errors as in cases where we might forget to add the 3.0 label to a PR
> or get the timeframe slightly wrong because of timezones. I was thinking
> instead we could maybe link to the list of commits between tags. Here’s an
> If you click on any of these commits, there is a link to the PR by the
> branch name so I feel like there’s no loss of information.
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev