[Pulp-dev] issue #3360 follow up

[David Davis]

I like the name ‘mirror_repository_version’ unless someone has a better
proposal.


David

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:

> Earlier today several of us discussed issue 3360[0]. In our discussion we
> concluded that it is valuable for users to be able to create exact copies
> of repository versions within a repository and across different
> repositories. I have updated the issue to reflect what we discussed. We
> decided that this use case should be included in the MVP.
>
> The issue currently states that the parameter will be called
> 'mirror_repository_version'. However, we could not agree if that is
> actually the best name for this parameter. Suggestions for a better name
> are welcome on this thread or as comments on the issue.
>
>
> [0] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3360
>
> -Dennis
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180219/204b8089/attachment.htm>