[Pulp-dev] Update PUP-4 re: Displaying the Code of Conduct

[Brian Bouterse]

+1 to these changes. Thank you for proposing/coordinating them.

We track website issues here [0], and I made an issue to add the /conduct/
page to pulpproject.org here [1]. Historically we don't put website issues
through sprint planning. I can review/test the changes if that is helpful.

As an aside, if the language of PUP-4 needs updating, a diff can be
approved via lazy consensus (I think).

[0]: https://github.com/pulp/pulpproject.org/issues/
[1]: https://github.com/pulp/pulpproject.org/issues/134

-Brian


On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:58 PM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> Thanks for starting this discussion. Personally, I think the best place
> for our Code of Conduct is on our website. To use another project as an
> example, Django’s CoC is easily accessible on their website:
>
> https://www.djangoproject.com/conduct/
>
> <https://www.djangoproject.com/conduct/>I feel like our Code of Conduct
> shouldn’t live on Github as it applies to all members of our community—not
> just developers (and Github is developer-centric).
>
> So +1 to putting our CoC on our website and linking to it from
> a CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md file.
>
> David
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:37 PM Dana Walker <dawalker at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> PUP-4 proposed Pulp adopt a Code of Conduct as we previously had none.
>> This proposal was accepted in December 2017.  At the time, it was decided
>> to link to the PUP itself in CONTRIBUTING.md. [0]
>>
>> In creating that file today for another issue [1], it became apparent
>> that linking to the PUP means linking to a document that has several
>> paragraphs of "should we do this" unfinished sounding language from the
>> proposal before we get to the actionable code we want a community member to
>> read.
>>
>> I propose that, as we did for the CCRC in PUP-5, we actually house the
>> Code of Conduct itself on 1) our website, and link to it from a
>> CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md file in our base directory, or 2) house the document in
>> a CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md file directly.
>>
>> This would bring us in line with the GitHub Community Standards. [1][2]
>>
>> Please respond with comments, questions, or preferences regarding this
>> proposed update.
>>
>> In absence of any -1's we will be moving forward with one of the two
>> proposed changes to the display location no later than Monday July 9.
>>
>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0004.md
>> [1] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3599
>> [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulp/community
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Dana
>>
>>
>> Dana Walker
>>
>> Associate Software Engineer
>>
>> Red Hat
>>
>> <https://www.redhat.com>
>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180702/666a8825/attachment.htm>